Thursday, September 8, 2016

Sherwood and Judge Milas Hale dispute ACLU lawsuit over hot check court

Posted By on Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM

IN DEFENSE: Judge Butch Hale responds to suit over hot check court.
  • IN DEFENSE: Judge Butch Hale responds to suit over hot check court.

The city of Sherwood and Judge Milas "Butch" Hale III have responded to the ACLU-backed lawsuit alleging that the hot check court they operate amounts to a debtors' prison, with unending fees and jail for people originally charged with misdemeanor hot checks. In short, the defendants say: Not guilty.

Here's the response.
The city and judge deny all allegations of unconstitutional conduct. While admitting some general descriptions of procedure, the response frequently takes exception to how actions are characterized, such as when the lawsuit said one plaintiff was "snared" by the system.Sherwood and the judge say the plaintiffs haven't made a valid claim and that the lawsuit amounts to unlawful collateral attack on criminal convictions. They say their actions were lawful and based on reasonable interpretations of the law.

The response says they have insufficient information to refute many of the individual tales of woe told by individual plaintiffs, beyond initial check charges. They did, however, dispute some factual assertions. For example: one plaintiff's complaint that she was charged for an insufficient fund check when they said it was written from a closed account. And they also disputed another plaintiff's complaint that he still faced $2,600 in fines and costs from a 2009 hot check.

Significantly, the response claims that the court does consider a defendant's ability to pay charges assessed and will work out payment plans. And, among dozens of general denials, they also specifically deny a claim that a plaintiff, Nakit Lewis, was jailed because she couldn't afford to pay her fines. But the response doesn't give an alternative explanation.

No trial date has been set.


Tags: , , , ,

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Eureka Springs City Council passes civil rights ordinance, sets stage for potential lawsuit

    The Eureka Springs City Council last night suspended the rules and hurriedly passed a civil rights ordinance that extends anti-discrimination protection to gay people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It sets up a potential legal challenge if the legislature completes passage of a law aimed at preserving legal discrimination against gay people.
    • Feb 10, 2015
  • Arkansas lawyers file class action against Walmart, others, over herbal products: UPDATE

    Lawyers in Little Rock and Fayetteville have filed federal suit in the Western District against Walmart, Target and Walgreens stores for selling herbal products that an investigation in New York discovered contained little or n one of the ingredients advertised on the bottle.
    • Feb 5, 2015
  • Scheduled activities of the legislature: Open to the public

    A legal friend buttresses my daily mention that the public should feel free to attend the "scheduled activities" at which major lobbies are running roughshod over Amendment 94 by having daily free meals and cocktails paid by special interests, in many cases at hideaway Capitol Hill apartments in which the entire legislature could not fit, even if they wanted to do so.
    • Feb 10, 2015

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation