The House completed action today on Sen. Trent Garner’s SB 522, intended to discourage “mass picketing,” a  piece of legislation similar to many being passed by Republicans lawmakers nationwide to tamp down political demonstrations. The vote was 58-22.

Rep. Bob Ballinger insisted 1st Amendment rights would not be infringed — the bill even says so. What the bill says and what law enforcement officers might do when faced with, for example, an unexpectedly large turnout of protesters that might obstruct what an officer believes is “free use” of a roadway, are two potentially very different things.

Advertisement

Look, too, at Garner’s definition of unlawful obstruction of a private residence.  That could, by definition, include “intimidation communicated near or contiguous to the private residence.” What does THAT mean? What if a thousand or so people gathered a block from Trent Garner’s residence and said they didn’t much like his lawmaking or that of his employer,  U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton? Intimidating? Near? Maybe if you’re not a big fan of robust 1st Amendment speech and assembly.

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article A further assault on lawmaking by the people Next article Parole board recommends no clemency for death row inmate Marcel Williams