

More on the hearbreaking news that the New Orleans Times-Picayune will no longer be a daily newspaper. It will be printed three days a week, but shift more attention to digital delivery. The owner of that newspaper is doing the same thing in Huntsville, Mobile and Birmingham. Four substantial Southern cities without a daily newspaper. Unbelievable. No Saturday paper to peruse high school football scores.
Here's an interesting report on what happened when this same plan was put in place in Ann Arbor, Mich.
Last night, the open line mentioned and readers engaged at some length on another piece of newspaper news closer to home. It was a report in The City Wire, an energetic on-line news "paper" for Fort Smith and Northwest Arkansas, that the Hussman-Stephens Northwest Arkansas newspaper combine was not producing the hoped-for profits. A New York consultant has been hired to search for "efficiency" and new revenue.
As I remarked last night, the problem seems self-evident. In preserving the three Stephens dailies as inserts to the regional Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, the combine has duplicated printing and staff costs, apparently without achieving any meaningful revenue boost from selling people into one or the other or both. A unified regional daily newspaper seems the obvious solution, at some further significant cost to people, the major newspaper expense. That's just idle speculation, of course, but it has seemed the obvious outcome from the start of this venture. If increased revenue ideas are out there, this consultant will become the most-sought-after commodity in American newspapering, which has been on a cumulative downward trend in revenue for years.
It's a national dilemma. Has advertising changed fundamentally? Will readers pay sufficient money for digital subscriptions to support comprehensive reporting staffs? Are free TV websites — with most headlines, sports scores and weather — enough for most people? These are questions that may not be answered in my lifetime, though, as fast as things move and given my advancing age (almost 62), they might. The survival of the daily "paper"? That question HAS been answered, just not the second part — when is the final day?
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (23)
As I figured last night, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette this morning for the third time gave page one attention in the state's largest news outlet to a fringe presidential candidate, John Wolfe. Thus the Republican-promoted bandwagon for a Democratic primary anti-Obama vote got another incalculable boost from the best media of all media, the free kind.
News today is that Wolfe hasn't followed party rules and so won't qualify for delegates at the Democratic Party nominating convention. For his incompetent fringe candidacy, he's effectively been bestowed martyrdom.
Lots of candidates still are running on the Republican side of the presidential primaries in Arkansas. Several of them have a lot greater bona fides that John Wolfe. I await the page one treatment of their candidacies and what delegates will be available to them should Arkansas voters not accept the certainty of a Mitt Romney nomination.
And speaking of rules: How about some investigation of Wolfe's scant filings on campaign expenditures? The FEC on-line records show precious little. Of course, maybe Wolfe is not the one paying for all the robocalls being made in Arkansas urging a Wolfe vote. An answer to that question might be interesting. Might even be worth page one.
UPDATE: The Arkansas GOP distributed its delegate rules today. Guess what? The party has a rule, with which candidates are urged to comply, to ensure minority representation among delegates. This is the rule Wolfe ignored. I presume D-G will be hopping on a followup about whether Republican candidates are observing their party rule and if the party cares if they do or not. Right.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (3)
A tipster told me last week that word would be coming soon about staff reductions at the Jonesboro Sun as the Paxton chain-owned newspaper consolidated page design and production jobs in Kentucky. News of that popped up further recently on sportsjournalists.com
It's only the tip of a national iceberg. Newspapers haven't yet reversed the steady decline in print advertising dollars. Web sales — either in paywalls for readers or advertising — haven't nearly covered the loss. So staffs are dwindling; page and ad production is being consolidated in regional "hubs"; copy editors are disappearing, and special project reporting teams are becoming a thing of the past at some of the country's most prestigious papers.
On that cheery note .... I need to think about something to write to note the Arkansas Times' 20th anniversary as a weekly newspaper-turned-multiplatform medium. Bottom line: We're still here.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (16)
He's now an assistant professor of media studies at Fort Hays (Kansas) State University. He's migrated some of his VHS tapes from Channel 4 days to the Internet. News and TV junkies ought to get a kick out of looking back at such names in the news as Barry Lee Fairchild (executed), Johnny Burnette (murdered), Tommy Robinson (sheriff/congressman now runs a liquor store) and more, including an investigation of a suspected dognapping business that supplied medical researchers before it was busted.
You can catch about 10 minutes here, much of it about the dog operation and also about an abused child.
And another 9 minutes here on Fairchild and the Burnette slaying.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (4)

Fasten your seatbelts.
UPDATE: Multiple anonymous sources are now reporting that Executive Editor Griffin Smith has announced his resignation, effective tomorrow, and that Managing Editor David Bailey will be taking over supervision of the news department. He announced his resignation, not retirement, at a newsroom meeting attended by Democrat-Gazette Publisher Walter Hussman. No explanation was given for the change.
One staff member said the announcement came with what would be reassuring news for the staff, an end to regular "furloughs" as a cost-saving tool.
Smith has been executive editor of the paper since about July 1, 1992, just shy of 20 years. He's a lawyer and has a background in magazine writing.
According to a brief account on the newspaper website, Smith said it was the "right time" and Hussman said no replacement would be hired for the immediate future. Hussman, according to the account, praised Smith's work. There was no mention of whether Smith's wife, Libby, would continue as newspaper travel editor. According to the D-G account, she learned of his decision when he announced it to the staff. He remarked that she would become the family's main breadwinner.
Also to watch in the future: Whether some of Smith's favorite quirks will be continued under new leadership, notably his rewriting of history pertaining to the Little Rock school crisis to put Orval Faubus in a more favorable light and his insistence that seatbelt use not be mentioned in reports on fatal auto accidents. Could use of the word "vomit" be far behind? And, perish the thought, spokeswomen? And less attention to David O. Dodd's birthday? (UPDATE: I now have the statutory two sources who say don't expect vomit to grace the pages. That, I'm told reliably, is a word the publisher banned.)
The Democrat-Gazette has posted a story on-line that doesn't appear to be behind their pay wall.
I spoke later with new newsroom leader Bailey, 62, who's been at the Democrat-Gazette since 1993. Contrary to what I indicated in first reports from various sources, the appointment wasn't characterized as an interim one. This would follow the pattern of the Hussman-owned Chattanooga paper, where a departing executive editor wasn't replaced and the managing editor assumed newsroom leadership.
He said the end of the one-day-a-month furlough had been under discussion for sometime and was met with warm applause from the staff. "I think things are looking up," he said.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (20)
Two programs on media bias in the next two days:
This evening, at the Clinton School for Public Service, Joseph Torres will talk about "News for All the People," a book he co-authored on the history of race and the American media. Starts at 6 p.m. Reserve your seats by emailing publicprograms@clintonschool.uasys.edu, or calling 501-683-5239.
Tomorrow at 6 p.m., the UALR Department of Sociology and Anthropology is hosting a screening of "Miss Representation," a documentary about the media's portrayal of women, which will be followed by a panel discussion. Leslie Peacock and I will participate along with Times columnist Graham Gordy and AY's Angela Thomas. All happens in the EIT Auditorium. Free, but reservations required.
Posted by Lindsey Millar on | Permalink | Comments (0)
A reminder that Rosi Smith and I will be begging for money for KUAR/KLRE from 6:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. this morning.
Call 569-8485 or 1-800-952-2528 and make a pledge.
Or go to kuar.org
The blog match is in effect. Mention the blog and I'll add $10 to your total. $20 for Republicans.
Morning posting will be light to non-existent until I'm done.
I doubt we can top the showing today of the newlyweds, Jay Barth and Chuck Cliett today, but we'll do our best. It's the final day of the drive. Begging ends today.
UPDATE: We raised more than $15,000 this morning and had a healthy response to blog challenge, but I don't have final numbers. We even scored a couple of Republican donors.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (7)
I've mentioned before that because the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and its affiliated newspapers in Northwest Arkansas won't publish marriage announcements by same-sex couples, the Arkansas Times is happy to provide that service.
I am particularly happy to do so today because the announcement is that of friends — Jay Barth, the Hendrix professor and Arkansas Times contributor, and Chuck Cliett, a lawyer and colleague of mine on the board of the Fred Darragh Foundation. Their announcement, in the fashion given similarly high profile unions in the New York Times:
Walker Jay Barth and Charles Buren Cliett, Jr. of Little Rock, Arkansas, were married March 18 by Susan N. Herman, president of the Board of Directors of the American Civil Liberties Union on which Dr. Barth serves as Arkansas affiliate representative, at a private residence in Brooklyn. A reception dinner followed at Seersucker, the Brooklyn restaurant owned by Arkansas-born chef Robert Newton.A blessing of the civil marriage will be performed by the Rev. Scott Walters at Christ Episcopal Church in Little Rock on April 14.
Dr. Barth, 45, is M.E. and Ima Graves Peace Distinguished Professor of Politics and director of civic engagement projects at Hendrix College in Conway, Arkansas. He graduated from Hendrix College magna cum laude and received a master's degree and PhD in political science from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is co-author of the most recent edition of Arkansas Politics and Government: Do the People Rule? (University of Nebraska Press, 2005).
Barth is the son of Jayme Lynette Barth of Little Rock. Ms Barth, who is retired, was a computer programmer for various companies including Dillard’s department stores.
Mr. Cliett, 51, is an attorney specializing in insurance regulatory law and a partner in the law firm of Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard in Little Rock. He graduated from Mississippi State University cum laude and received his JD, with honors, from The University of Texas at Austin.
Cliett is a son of Grace Campbell Cliett and the late Dr. Charles Buren Cliett of West Point, Mississippi. Ms. Cliett, who is retired, worked in county government for manyyears, also serving on the Board of the West Point Housing Authority. Dr. Cliett was professor and head of the Aerospace Engineering Department at Mississippi State University for 25 years.
Cliett and Barth met in 2000 on the blind half of a double date set up by a mutual friend when Dr. Barth was visiting Austin, where Mr. Cliett then lived. They immediately bonded during an afternoon road trip to the Lyndon Baines Johnson Ranch outside Austin. The two political junkies remember sharing laughs about
double-edged observations in First Lady Barbara Bush’s memoir for sale at the Ranch’s bookstore. They then began a long-distance relationship that lasted until 2002 when Mr. Cliett relocated to Little Rock.
I think I should add that landmark litigation continues today on efforts to give the full measure of legal protection to those same-sex couples married in states such as Massachusetts and New York.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (46)
She'll be replacing Tiffany Hoffman as the district's director of communications. Hoffman has moved into the real estate business.
Smith is to start April 2, the district said.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (3)

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette persists in attempting to reshape history to be more favorable to Orval E. Faubus, in whose cause the father of the paper's executive editor, Griffin Smith jr., labored during the school crisis. (The senior Smith represented the segregationist Mothers' League.)
Again today in an article (sub. reqd.) about a speech in Conway by Susan Eisenhower, granddaughter of the president who sent troops to Little Rock to protect the constitutional rights of black children, the newspaper used boilerplate suggesting that Faubus called out National Guard to keep the peace, as opposed to foiling desegregation. And then it repeated boilerplate about problems that erupted after "Faubus removed the guardsmen on the order of a federal judge" on Sept. 20.
There was no such order.
From a transcript of a hearing Sept. 20, 1957 before federal Judge Ronald N. Davies:
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: The issue today is not whether the governor had a right to use the guard, the National Guard. We concede that. The issue is not whether he had the right to use the National Guard for the preservation of peace and order.
In an oral order at the conclusion of the hearing, Davies granted the Justice Department's requested injunction, but not against the use of the Guard to keep the peace. Rather:
... such injunction shall issue without delay, enjoining those respondents from obstructing or preventing, by use of the National Guard or otherwise, the attendance of negro students at Little Rock Central High School under the plan of integration approved by this Court and from otherwise obstructing or interfering with orders of this court in connection with the plan of integration.
Not clear enough that the judge meant no limit on purported peacekeeping duties of the Guard and that he had ordered no removal of the Guard from Central? Here's what the judge said in his written order the next day:
Provided that this order shall not be deemed to prevent Orval E. Faubus, as governor of the state of Arkansas, from taking any and all action he may deem necessary for preservation of peace and order, by means of the Arkansas National Guard, or otherwise, which does not hinder or interfere with the right of eligible Negro students to attend the Little Rock Central High School.
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court noted this distinction, too, in upholding Davies (Aaron v. Cooper, 158 F. Spp. 220). It said: "The evidence indicates that the Arkansas National Guard, which is composed of 10,500 men, could have maintained peace and order without preventing the eligible colored students from attending Central High School."
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (21)
Three Bryant aldermen — Adrian Henley, Brenda Miller and Danny Steele — filed a lawsuit yesterday in Saline Circuit court over anonymous comments made on local websites. They contend unnamed defendants, principally using mysaline.com, have defamed them. They say the comments were knowingly false, a standard necessary for a public official to make a defamation claim.
They also accuse the unnamed defendants with "cyberbullying." Said the lawsuit:
Defendants have transmitted, sent, or posted communications by electronic means with the purpose to frighten, coerce, intimidate, threaten, abuse, harass or alarm Plaintiffs and they have done so in furtherance of severe, repeated, or hostile behavior toward Plaintiffs.
While these aldermen have been a source of much resistance to Mayor Jill Dabbs stormy management, which earns them some sympathy here, I think this is a bad idea for any number of reasons. One is the rooting around they apparently intend to do to uncover who makes comments on websites. (!?!) Another is the further publicity they'll give to the very comments they don't like. Another is the exposure they might give opponents to their own private activities in the course of lawsuit discovery. Another, and most important, is the baseline fact that they are elected officials serving in a political hotspot partially of their own making. If you can't stand the heat ...
Cheree Franco, in her story this week, depicts Bryant as a fairly typical suburban community. Those who really care about politics are wrapped up in this controversy. But a much larger number seem to be mostly concerned about getting their kids to school and doing their jobs. Legal fights to settle essentially political disputes (best decided in elections) are rarely popular.
I'm sympathetic, too, to the small media outlet that will bear the brunt of the legal expenses in opposing the fishing expedition for the aldermen's critics. It's a chilling thing. The lawsuit includes a request (link corrected) for an order that Shelli Russell, operator of MySaline.com, preserve all information that could lead the plaintiffs to the identities of The Shadow, Lawchic, lawchic, up beat in bryant, Up Beat in Bryant, Upbeat in Bryant, Lady Bella, Shadidog, Sybil, Sybill and Concerned Citizen.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (21)
It's open. Closing out:
* POLITICS AND SOCIAL MEDIA: Michael Cook, who's a Democrat, writes at length about the obvious — Republicans are far advanced compared with Arkansas Democratic politicians on use of Facebook and Twitter. Democratic Chair Will Bond sounds defensive — Democrats are more interested in doing good deeds for people than making up cute Tweets. I think a great deal of Republican Facebooking and Twittering is echo chamber stuff. But it nourishes the base that uses social media. It sometimes — regrettably — plants bogus themes that find their way into mainstream media. It communicates in ways people today increasingly communicate. You have to do it all. Will Bond's crack reminds me of the piece I read the other day about a guy who told his kids in the 50s that TV was a passing fad and people would be back to concentrating on books in short order. The politician who doesn't do it all — knock on doors, make frequent public appearances, raise money, communicate by TV, radio, mail, telephone and social media — is a politician who won't win most of the time.
* FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Important decision today allows at least some window into the record of police officer use of force by the Little Rock police. But issues remain. They still have not released to me the name of the officer who killed a man who carried a weapon when a SWAT team broke into his Oak Forest house Jan. 17 on a no-knock search for a drug bust. The name should be released. So should his record, if any, of use of force. I suggest no wrongdoing on his part or second-guessing of actions that day. But openness is critical for accountability and confidence in a public agency with the power to use summary force. UPDATE: Though I was denied this information several days after the fact, Lt. Terry Hastings says the officer's name, Jeff Holt, was released the day after the shooting. I'll take him at his word on that, though I have a copy of an e-mail he sent me six days after the shooting saying the name was being withheld because of threats by people related to the man killed. I still have a request pending on use of force reports he's made, if any.
* ARKANSAS TECH TO FIX THEATER: Now that the administration has rid itself of former theater director Ardith Morris, the college is willing to spend some money to make the theater there usable. The Tech Board of Trustees today approved spending $176,000 to renovate the theater workshop, cited for safety problems.
* DRUG BUSTS CONTINUE: More federal drug indictments — nine of them in Pine Bluff covering 24 defendants. Pine Bluff crowd has a lot to learn from Helena 'bangers. Not a single funky nickname among those named. Speaking of the Delta Blues bust in eastern Arkansas: A third police officer has pleaded guilty. At some point, they might start assembling a list of potential cooperating witnesses sufficient to move up the judicial system food chain.
* BLYTHEVILLE PROBE SOUGHT: Prosecuting Attorney Scott Ellington of Jonesboro has asked for a State Police investigation following completion of a legislative audit that shows the city of Blytheville is $2 million behind in payment of withholding to the IRS.
* WOMEN STEAMROLLERED: On top of Darrell Issa's all-male anti-birth control show trial in the House today, the Virginia Assembly has voted to give personhood to fertilized eggs and to require transvaginal examination of women — even if they don't want it — before they may receive even a medical abortion. Shouldn't there be a gender gap coming? Will a technical override of rape-by-instrument statutes be high on the Arkansas Republican agenda in 2013? Sadly, I think I know the answer.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (35)
I can't judge this case, but I do believe that public officials will continue to play games with the Freedom of Information Act if there are never consequences for those who act in bad faith.
So, this case developing in Fayetteville could be important.
Marilyn Heifner, executive director of the Fayetteville Advertising and Promotion Commission, has been placed on paid leave while a prosecutor investigates whether she violated the FOI. The Northwest Arkansas Times had asked her about a deal to sell the old postoffice in Fayetteville. She was, to put it mildly, not fully forthcoming. Her fallback is that she fully complied once she received a written FOI request. The law does not require a written request for public documents.
FYI: The law wasn't written for reporters. It was written for the public — every citizen of Arkansas.
PS — All references here are to the Arkansas FOI law. The federal law is more complicated and, as reader bopbamboom noted, it DOES require written requests for records.
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (8)

The Arkansas Lottery Commission tonight at 7:45 p.m. named William Bishop Woosley as the new Director of the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery. Woosley, the Lottery’s Chief Legal Counsel since its startup in mid-2009, will be paid $165,000 annually.
The decision followed a day-long meeting of the Commissioners with all nine members present. Seven candidates were interviewed on Saturday prior to the Commissioners’ deliberations and decision.
The appointment is effective immediately.
Surprised? I am a little bit. But he doesn't lack experience in the field. He carries no political baggage.
The Commission vote to hire Woosley after almost 12 hours of closed meetings was 6-2. Commissioner Bruce Engstrom did not vote, as expected. Commissioners George Hammons and Raymond Frazier voted no. They joined in the unanimous vote setting Woosley's salary. He had been making about $115,000.
It is safe to assume several of the seven candidates had champions in the closed session (Hammons and Frazier apparently supported Bob Nash, for example). Woosley, a stabilizing influence on the lottery staff after the departure of startup leader Ernie Passailaigue, comes to the job with some general appreciation among staff for his leadership, along with Interim Director Julie Baldridge.
Before choosing Woosley, the Commission met briefly in executive session on a pay raise for Baldridge. She was increased from $109,000 to $130,000 in recognition of her work during the interim. She also willl continue as a high-level employee. The commission has two deputy commissioner slots that are open and may not be filled. They were held, at $225,000 each, by assistants Passailaigue had brought with him from South Carolina. All three departed in short order after a series of controversies over pay, leave policy and travel expenses.
The field of candidates included lottery officials from other states, a former race track executive and a couple with Arkansas political connections — Bob Nash, a former aide to Bill Clinton, and Bill Stovall, a House speaker and top House staff member now.
Woosley was in private practice for eight years, most of them in Stuttgart, before going to work in the attorney general's office in 2007 then joining the lottery in 2009. He's a 1996 graduate of the University of Central Arkansas and a 1999 graduate of the UALR Law School
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (16)

The Democrat-Gazette editorial page hit a new low today in its hysterical opposition to an expanded veterans service center on Main Street. It compared the Department of Veterans Affairs with an authoritarian Germany. Godwin's law strikes. If the words Nazi or Hitler were not used, the intent of the Germanic imagery was clear enough.
The VA just published a notice informing its subjects what was coming. Now we’re all supposed to fall in and follow orders. Jawohl!
The VA gave months of notice and then moved ahead with plans fully allowed by current city zoning to establish a center for vets' education, treatment and miscellaneous service bigger than the one that operates — without reported problems — in a smaller building 10 blocks from City Hall. Imagine what the property rights crowd normally would say if the city cooked up an ordinance after the fact of a legal contract and significant expense to negate that contract.
The City Board will vote tonight on a hurryup "emergency" ordinance to throw a roadblock in front of the VA by requiring a conditional use permit. It will face opposition from the representative of the ward in which the center is to be located, which ought to tell you something. Mayor Mark Stodola seems, however, to have the votes to beat veterans services on Main Street, no matter what the additional cost might be to federal taxpayers.
I'd ask two things: 1) Take a visit to the deplorable location on Confederate Boulevard (what's that neighborhood, chopped liver?) that Stodola and the D-G seem to think is just a fine place to dump the people who return from foreign wars in need of assistance; 2) Remember them and U.S. Rep. Tim Griffin, another implacable foe of the VA's plans, when they trot out the tear-stained tributes to troops on Memorial Day.
I have only nominal representation on the City Board (they are typically only proxies for the taxpayer-subsidized Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce), but I'd ask that they resist Stodola's ex post facto attack on veterans services.
UPDATE: Kathy Wells, a neighborhood organization leader and general civic gadfly, opposes tonight's ordinance on broader grounds. Read on:
Posted by Max Brantley on | Permalink | Comments (9)
Damn it's hot! Close to 90 said the bank sign. Only good thing to come…
Empire and sex-gender Control. Naomi Wolf knocks it out of the park:
"What Really…
Re: Acclamation
*LR ZOO NEWS RELEASE*
Cover Story / Arkansas Reporter / The Week That Was / Smart Talk / The Insider / The Observer / Editorial / Max Brantley / Ernest Dumas / Gene Lyons / Bob Lancaster / Words / Guest Writer / Letters
A&E Feature / To-Do List / In Brief / Movie Reviews / Music Reviews / Theater Reviews / A&E News / Art Notes / Graham Gordy / Books / Media / Dining Reviews / Dining Guide / What's Cookin' / Calendar / The Televisionist / Movie Listings / Gallery Listings