Monday, December 31, 2012

The Saul Alinsky Drinking Game

Posted By on Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:02 PM

Saturday morning I read Mike Masterson’s column in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette when he wrote of the National Rifle Association:

“ . . . being classically demonized a la the late Chicago agitator Saul Alinsky (and roundly criticized by a naive mainstream press) for daring to advocate placing armed guards in schools to protect innocent students.”

Ah, Saul Alinsky.

Already our blood chills at the mere mention of the name of this . . . this . . . Chicago community community organizer!

Yes. Community . . . organizer.

Alinsky once wrote a book, Rules for Radicals, which has been the political bible for almost every political group across the planet, including the modern-day Tea Party. Sadly, most Tea Party members only know of Alinsky’s work through the sneering references they come across in newspapers, radio programs and on television.

Most people - Left, Right or Rosicrucian - aren’t really aware of the “rules” set down by this man so long ago. So, just for fun, here they are:

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources — money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.


RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals

Wait a minute, one might ask oneself. A lot of these “rules” sound awfully familiar. Aren’t most political groups - including (and especially our friends in the Tea Party) using these same methods today?

Of course, they would call them by different names. In fact, Reality Show Governor Sarah Palin mastered several of these techniques in her rise to . . . well, wherever she is, these days.

They are tried and true methods, and I have seen variations of some of them used - by both liberals and conservatives - on local issues over the years. I read a site where one writer proclaimed “12 Ways To Use Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals Against Liberals,” as if he had discovered something new and wonderful in the world.

I’ll bet used car salesmen love this guy.

Indeed, some of them were practiced in American politics long before Alinsky codified them, and we even read them in our history books as small tykes.

I always get a kick out of those lost souls who decry the work of Saul Alinsky, and then at some point as me if I have ever read the works of Ayn Rand, or The Prince, by Machiavelli.

But on to our drinking game . . .

I’m Diabetic, so I’ll just stick to Coke Zero, or coffee, but the idea is the same.

Every time you see Alinsky’s name mentioned in print, or hear his name brought up - especially as someone who might be the “patron saint” of the Obama administration - reward yourself with a big old swig of whatever you are having. If they don’t mention any of the exact rules, take two.

And if they don’t mention the fact that folks other than “radicals” - for all their protestations, more on the Right use them these days than folks on the Left, sad to say - have adopted the rules, have a third drink.

Honestly, do you you really take it will take longer than a week to finish the bottle?

******

Quote of the Day

Your body is the baggage you must carry through life. The more excess baggage, the shorter the trip. - Arnold H. Glasow

rsdrake@cox.net

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Richard Drake

  • Missed Connections: Is Match taking a walk on Sleazy Street?

    Well, it’s a great tool for potential stalkers, I guess. But that’s about all that can be said for the dating site Match seemingly taking an idea directly from craigslist.
    • Apr 19, 2017
  • O accursed dreams!

    I love my dreams, and I’ve been having vastly entertaining ones for decades, many of which I can still recall, years later.
    • Apr 17, 2017
  • Voting: The Scowling One just can’t control himself

    Congressman Steve Womack, who “represents” the good folks of Northwest Arkansas in Congress, just can’t help voting himself from against their best interests.
    • Apr 11, 2017
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation