<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The Senate talks filibuster reform
    
      by Max Brantley</title>
      <link>http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Rss.xml?oid=2595928&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The Senate talks filibuster reform
    
      by Max Brantley</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Arkansas Times. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Arkansas Times readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Arkansas Times.</copyright>
      <webMaster>robert@arktimes.com (Arkansas Times Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:45:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596452]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596452]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Verla Sweere]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Fillibuster may be okay under the old rules, but is a travesty as now used.  If there is a real objection, make those senators work for their money, stay on the floor and keep that mouth moving...  Otherwise bring the issue to a motion and vote it up or down.  It worked for decades, it can work again.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1265623">Verla Sweere</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:18:20 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596252]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596252]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[DeathbyInches]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[When you have a situation where something that causes all kinds of trouble is left in place year after year, it means someone is making money off the bad thing. <br>
<br>
Look at the liquor laws in all 50 states. It's a total mishmash of senseless rules that make a few at the top super wealthy. Look at the voting laws in all 50 states, it's crazy and it causes untold trouble every time it's time to vote. <br>
<br>
We were plunged into hell the day 51% didn't win the day. Yeah maybe the 51% allowed slavery to live decades past its time, but with the exception of wage slavery, slavery is over. <br>
<br>
Since Americans are made up of 2 different sets of brain wiring just about evenly divided 50-50, tons of progressive legislation that would have made our lives easier has been lost for the lack of the 60th vote. We can stay in the hell and ride the dying horse down or we can abolish the filibuster and come into the 21st century. <br>
<br>
Yes, it's a dangerous move because someday American voters will be stupid enough to hand the reins over to the GOP again. But by doing nothing out of fear of that happening, America will not move forward and I want no part of imitating the Gerrymandering Republicans who delight in stacking all things in their favor no matter how unfair or who it hurts. <br>
<br>
Maybe a 51% Senate could bring back Glass-Steagall, the best of all banking reform acts that protected us all those years between 1932 and 1999 when our own Bill Clinton pushed it over the cliff. Maybe a 51% Senate could bring back the Fairness Doctrine that would rid the world of Fox News & Rush and would help Arkansas voters to not be fooled into backing the bad guys in each election. Might even drop the Bushmaster sales a few notches. <br>
<br>
One thing for sure, we can't go on the way we've gone the last 20 or so years. My god what a terrible place America has become. Even the damn Amish are fighting each other!  We need monstrously big changes in Obama's 2nd term or we're going to suck suck suck for the rest of our lives and leave a special hell for our children to navigate when we're gone.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1069753">DeathbyInches</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:57:35 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596174]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596174]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Cato]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It's foolish to even think the two wings of the Corporate party are going to do anything to lessen their strangle hold on the Senate because they are more interested in their vested interests than the 14 % approval rating given by the American public.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1120499">Cato</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:44:42 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596089]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596089]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[plainjim]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I would be very cautious in proceeding to do away with the filibuster.  It can protect, as well as block.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1081619">plainjim</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:09:35 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596040]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596040]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Eureka Springs]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The framers formed the senate to do exactly what they are doing. Enhance, protect and preserve the very rich at the expense of everyone else... if and when that means needless war and total abrogation of rule of law, massive government secrecy.... no problem. The very health looting spree around awhile offers as a demonstration, the gutting of Social Security and Medicare are perfect examples. At least in the House we the people have a chance every two years to take corrective measures... instead of 18 to 24 years and billions of dollars it would likely take to do the same in the Senate.<br>
<br>
Along with establishing public multi-party, campaign finance only we should abolish the United States Senate. Triple (or much more) the numbers of US House seats in order to increase actual representation.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1089135">Eureka Springs</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:18:36 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596009]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2596009]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[around awhile]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I don't feel bad that the judges had to wait - even up to a year - for their lifetime appointments.  Turning the Senate into the House would make it that much easier for the whims of the ill-informed public to become law.  Without the ability of the minority to slow things down, yes even the the Robert Borks and other judges, you can kiss Obamacare goodbye, along with Social Security, Medicare, and all of the other hard fought progressive measures which ultimately had to get over the 60 vote hurdle.  Repeal would be an election away without the Senate formed to the wishes of the framers.  Be careful what you wish for here people, the Democrats wont control the Senate forever.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=2596008">around awhile</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:49:15 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The Senate talks filibuster reform]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2595960]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/12/29/the-senate-talks-filibuster-reform/#2595960]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[radical centrist]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[For Arkansas, the nomination process seems to be slower than the confirmation process.  It took Obama a couple of years to make nominations to fill vacancies here, such as U.S. Attorney.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/Profile?oid=1068154">radical centrist</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:52:18 -0600</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.arktimes.com">Arkansas Times</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



