Favorite

Bomb deals 

If what you knew about the Iran nuclear agreement were the apocalyptic warnings of Iranian terrorism and another Jewish holocaust — Mike Huckabee's contribution to the narrative — you would never suspect that we have had five decades of entirely futile efforts to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons by what we thought were either rogue nations or the good guys.

That includes the secret and despairing efforts of four presidents — Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon — to stop Israel itself from making the bombs and setting off a nuclear competition with Muslim countries.

You would never know that the agreement between Iran and the six global powers, led by the United States, promises to be the first successful effort to stop or seriously restrain a nation's nuclear-weapons development. The deal curbs Iran's suspected weapons program and allows inspections in return for an end to global oil and financial sanctions. The letter to the president last week from 29 of the nation's leading physicists and nuclear authorities endorsing the agreement described it as having "more stringent constraints than any previously negotiated nonproliferation agreement."

That is small praise if you follow nonproliferation's sad history and our feckless part in it, but it should give you far more comfort than the blind claims by such as Huckabee and Arkansas's Sen. Tom Cotton that the deal is a green light for Iran to build bombs, attack its neighbors and endanger us right here in Arkansas.

Here is an illustrative point. Huckabee, trying to leap ahead of other Republican presidential candidates in characterizing Barack Obama's latest crime against humanity, said the agreement leads Israelis "to the door of the ovens." How exactly are you leading them to the door of the ovens if the Israelis have the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons and sophisticated delivery systems of any nation outside the great powers?

Even if the deal with Iran were no stronger than its Republican critics say, it would be by far the best we have ever done to curb nuclear ambitions. Lacking diplomatic leverage, we could only despair as the Soviet Union and China stole our secrets and made the bomb and sigh as allies France and Britain did the same. But we tried, feverishly at times, timidly more often, to use diplomacy and sanctions or the threat of them to stop Israel, India, South Africa (it subsequently gave the bomb up), Pakistan and North Korea from joining the nuclear club. You know how they all turned out.

Let's revisit them anyway. They offer a clearer perspective on the Iran deal than the Huckabees and Cottons can provide. Israel is a good place to start. Since it was virtually a client state of the three Western nuclear powers, its atomic efforts were a ticklish problem, particularly for the United States. France, with an assist from the British, actually furnished Israel technology and materials.

When President Eisenhower, months before leaving office, expressed concern about what appeared to be a nuclear reactor spotted by his U-2 spy planes, Israel explained that it was a textile factory but put it off limits to inspectors. Ike's successor, John Kennedy, demanded inspections (privately, of course), refused a White House meeting with the Israeli prime minister and twice in 1963 wrote letters to the prime minister and his successor threatening total isolation of Israel unless inspectors were allowed. Israel gave in, ,but it proved useless because inspectors were denied access to key parts of the facility. The next year President Johnson tried vainly to stop Argentina from selling yellowcake to Israel. Israel conducted its first nuclear test in 1966 and the CIA informed Johnson that Israel was building bombs. The CIA maintained in a secret report to President Carter later that 206 pounds of highly enriched uranium that went missing in 1965 from a nuclear company in a Pittsburgh suburb went to Israel. An FBI investigation of the missing uranium hit a dead end.

President Nixon continued the pressure but, according to documents declassified eight years ago, he then reached a permanent solution with Prime Minister Golda Meir at the White House. Both nations would adopt a policy of "nuclear ambiguity." The U.S. would pretend not to know about Israel's nuclear program and Israel itself would be vague about it. The policy prevails today, though the Defense Department slipped up last winter and acknowledged that Israel had an arsenal of 80 to 400 weapons.

Spurred by territorial disputes with Pakistan, India developed the bomb in 1974, over quiet diplomatic protests from the United States. On the eve of the Indo-Pakistani war, Ali Bhutto, Pakistan's future prime minister, famously announced: "If India builds the bomb, we will eat grass and leaves for a thousand years, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own. The Christians have the bomb, the Jews have the bomb and now the Hindus have the bomb. Why not the Muslims, too, have the bomb?"

So, while Ronald Reagan explored the idea of ridding the planet of nuclear weapons with the Russians, the Muslims of Pakistan, with British help, built the bomb. Pakistan, which harbored al Qaeda, the Taliban and other Sunni terrorist groups, then sold its nuclear formulas to North Korea and Libya. Pakistan was sort of an American ally courted by Reagan and subsequent administrations, but unfriendly megalomaniacs ruled North Korea and Libya.

Bill Clinton and the Russians worked out a deal with North Korea to stop its weapons development and sign the nonproliferation treaty, but when George W. Bush denounced North Korea, Iran and Iraq as "the axis of evil" and prepared to invade Iraq, the Koreans and Iranians got busy with their nuclear programs again. North Korea withdrew from the nonproliferation treaty and built its first bomb. Despite a succession of multipower agreements negotiated by Clinton, Bush and Obama, North Korea continued off and on to build bombs and threaten its neighbors and the United States with annihilation.

But those Iranians, see, are bad dudes and only Barack Obama would trust them.

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Guns, God and gays

    Many more mass shootings like the one last week in Roseburg, Ore., will stain the future and no law will pass that might reduce the carnage. That is not a prediction but a fact of life that is immune even to Hillary Clinton.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015
  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Brant Collins named Group Travel Manager for Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism

Brant Collins named Group Travel Manager for Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism

Collins to work toward increasing visitation to Arkansas by groups and promoting the state's appeal

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Slim margin could decide 2014 elections

    • Good Day: to whom it may concern, I am Lori McKissick From Ohio U.S.A, I…

    • on March 28, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • "investigator of both sides": Aside from being a snide ass, you are an idiot. If…

    • on March 28, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Society is also judged on whether it uses reason, or emotion to create laws. So,…

    • on March 28, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation