Favorite

Can Hillary’s prophecy be fulfilled? 

There is gamesmanship aplenty in the Democratic presidential race, including a clever message from the newly troubled Hillary Clinton campaign. It goes like this:

Most likely, neither Clinton nor Barack Obama actually can get to the victory threshold in delegates. That's true, at least, without the addition of super-delegates, meaning the hundreds of elected officials and national committee members who get to be delegates automatically and can go either way.

That portends something not experienced in modern times, which is to say a brokered convention. It suggests chaos and schism, perhaps even disaster, for a party that otherwise ought to be sitting pretty.

So for the good of the party, one of the presidential candidates must stand down before the convention.

One version of the message goes so far as to say that, for serenity and unity, the one deferring should put personal animus aside and serve as the running mate.

It stands to reason, or so this message goes, that Obama should stand down. He's younger and will have another day.

For that matter, his long-term presidential prospects would be enhanced by relatively obscure celebrity as vice president rather than service in the Senate, where he'd be forced to cast votes that could cause him political problems.

That's the pitch. And here's the cleverness: Clinton actually might achieve a finessed self-fulfilling prophecy.

That could happen if a few thousand vacillating Democrats in states yet to vote picked up on this semi-subliminal notion that they need not make this agonizing choice. The outcome might be swung Hillary's way by voters absorbing this idea that they could spare the party this crisis and have both these candidates by letting Hillary go first.

Might Hillary stand down instead for the good of the party? That's a good one.

First, she's still the better bet to end up with more delegates. Working-class whites and Latinos favor her as solidly as blacks and upscale whites favor him, and working-class whites ought to deliver Ohio and Pennsylvania to her while Latinos ought to deliver Texas.

Second, deferring to interests other than their own has never been a particular concern of the Clintons.

I remember the morning in 1988 after Bill Clinton gave that ponderous and ridiculed speech for Michael Dukakis at the Democratic convention. Hillary was already spinning. If the charge was that Bill made a boring speech, she said, then that was a charge that could be made tenfold against Dukakis. That is to say she threw the party's presidential nominee under the bus.

It was Hillary who retrieved the Republican toe-sucker, Dick Morris, to show Bill how to “triangulate” his independent way.

Obama spreads a message of his own: If one candidate leads in earned delegates, meaning those garnered by regular people's votes in the various states, then the super-delegates should not undercut the people's will.

What Obama is not saying, because he doesn't have to say it or want to say it, is this: If the black candidate has the most earned delegates via the voters, surely the Democratic Party wouldn't want its super-delegates to revive those sad days of yore when white people kept black people down.

There's one little snag to Obama's argument. A reporter asked him the other day whether Ted Kennedy, a super-delegate who has endorsed Obama, ought now to switch to Clinton because Massachusetts' voters went by a large margin for Clinton. Obama sputtered.

That Massachusetts win is Hillary's most impressive political accomplishment. It appears the women of Massachusetts decided that the local men — Kennedy, John Kerry — were piling on the woman.

There's this other notion, also fed by Hillary's campaign, that if a male makes a considered choice for the male instead of the female in this one race, then it's gender mistreatment.

But Hillary is not all of womankind. She's one woman, and, at that, one mildly less accomplished in the U.S. Senate than, say, Blanche Lincoln.

If a lone female candidacy was synonymous with the cause of all womankind, then we'd all be anti-woman for not making Elizabeth Dole president when we had the chance.

Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Sarah Huckabee Sanders to be deputy White House press secretary

    Donald Trump announced additional White House staff today, notably including Sarah Huckabee Sanders, deputy assistant to the president and principal deputy press secretary.
  • Legislation filed for $10 million school voucher program

    The legislation to vastly expand transfer of state tax dollars to private schools came before the school choice day event I mentioned earlier.
  • Facing closure, Wilson Elementary families deliver angry message to school leaders

    "Why do you guys not care about your community? You’re tearing it down, not building it up, especially in the black community … It’s just a simple question — do you care?" one mother asked the superintendent. "Ma’am, I do care deeply about this district, and I do believe wholeheartedly we are making a better district every day," Poore replied.
  • Trumpeting

    When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

Jack Pearadin and Doug Nelsen found a 1.73-carat diamond after nearly a year of searching the park's field.

Event Calendar

« »

January

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • You signed yourself "silly," and you surely are.

    • on January 23, 2017
  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • Lyons doesn't have an ex-wife, silly.

    • on January 23, 2017
  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • What? That was all made up? Oh my. Well, let's hope he gets busy on…

    • on January 22, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation