Favorite

Colleges pay to play 

It’s expensive to compete with the big boys.

IT'S COSTING THEM: The Bears - move up to Division IAA.
  • IT'S COSTING THEM: The Bears - move up to Division IAA.

The University of Central Arkansas stepped up from Division II athletics to Division 1AA in 2006. This was one of many questionable calls made during the administration of President Lu Hardin, who has since resigned under pressure. UCA is looking for a new president now, and one of the first and largest problems he or she will have to confront is the painful cost of upward mobility in sports. It's not inconceivable that UCA, now under closer watch by state government and the public, would have to step back down, a rare occurrence in intercollegiate athletics.

Had UCA officials sought assistance in making their decision about sports, they would have found it easily accessible. Only a couple of years earlier, the NCAA, the governing body of collegiate athletics, had released a comprehensive study showing that moving up in sports classification was a losing proposition financially. NCAA researchers effectively refuted the argument made by every institution that wants to move up — that is, the greater revenue from playing bigger and better-known opponents will more than offset the increased cost of competing at the higher level (more athletic scholarships, more travel, bigger stadiums, etc.).

The NCAA studied the impact of reclassification on 19 colleges and universities from 1993 to 2003. Eleven of the institutions moved from Division IAA, the second highest division, to Division IA, the highest. Eight moved from Division II to Division IAA. The findings were essentially the same for both groups.

The dates of the study were such that it just missed both UCA and Arkansas State University at Jonesboro, which moved from IAA to IA in 1992, but there's no reason to believe the findings would have been different at either of those institutions. Both have struggled greatly with the demands of competing in a higher sports classification. (In this report, we've used the names for the various divisions that were in effect when the NCAA study was done. Since then, there's been some adjustment to the terminology in regard to football.)

It's true that revenue from athletics generally increased with higher classification, the report said. “Unfortunately, operating expenses grew at an even greater rate …” For example, all of the eight institutions that moved from Division II to Division IAA had lost money on their athletic programs before reclassification. After reclassification, they lost a lot more. School A (the study did not identify institutions by name) lost $3.6 million the year before it reclassified, and $6.9 million after reclassification. School B went from a $2.1 million loss to a $4.9 million loss. School C went from $2.8 million to $6.3 million. And so on. In each case, the operating loss of the athletic department was covered by transferring funds that had been intended other university purposes, raising the activities fees charged all students, and resorting to other non-athletics revenue sources.

The report concluded:

“Overall, our study suggests that there are neither obvious financial nor considerable nonfinancial measurable benefits from reclassification and that the primary motivation to reclassify is intangible (e.g., perceived increased prestige). Additionally, the findings in this study underscore the issues faced by school administrators who are considering reclassification. One significant and consistent finding is that reclassification is a financial drain to the athletics department. The fact that schools choose to reclassify despite this suggests that non-monetary perquisites, perceived increases in status, and a ‘keeping up with the Joneses' effect' may serve as a motive for reclassification.”

And when a school moves upward to the Southland Conference (UCA) or the Sun Belt Conference (ASU), it's hard to argue that there's much increase in prestige, either.

Information from UCA shows the athletic department with a $6.4 million operating loss last year, compared with a $4.5 million loss in fiscal 2006, the last year of competition in Division II. ASU athletics lost $7.4 million last year. The university said it had no records for 1992, the last year of Division IAA competition. 

Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by David Koon

  • L’Oréal, Halter's Scenic Hill Solar open massive new solar project in NLR.

    Cosmetics maker L’Oréal and Scenic Hill Solar, a Little Rock-based solar energy company started by former Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill Halter, cut the ribbon this morning on a massive new power generating solar array in North Little Rock.
    • Apr 20, 2017
  • Arkansans you should know

    Who have moved outside the state.
    • Apr 20, 2017
  • Cotton talks Trump's first 100 days at Clinton School

    Appearing with Clinton School for Public Service Dean Skip Rutherford, Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton spoke today at a Clinton School event focused on Cotton's assessment of Donald Trump's First 100 days in office. While there were some moments of applause and isolated jeering, the event was much less raucous than the town hall meetings Cotton has been attending of late, though Rutherford's questions pulled no punches in questioning Trump's temperament and agenda.
    • Apr 19, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Kanis development decried

    Fletcher Hollow wrong place for density, neighbors tell LR planners.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • Eligible voters removed from rolls

    Arkansas Times reporters contacted election officials around the state to see how they had handled flawed felon data from the secretary of state. Responses varied dramatically.
    • Aug 11, 2016
  • Real Republicans don't do pre-K

    Also, drifting away from trump, Hudson's downfall at ASU and more.
    • Aug 11, 2016

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Latest in Arkansas Reporter

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Event Calendar

« »

April

S M T W T F S
  1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30  

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation