Favorite

Editorial June 30 

Why do they hate America? It’s not the flag that makes America great, it’s the freedom. Other countries have flags, some of them rather pretty. They don’t have anything as beautiful as Americans’ right to say what we please, or to worship as we want. American troops have died fighting to pre-serve those rights. Descendants of American heroes are now asked to dishonor their forebears, to voluntarily surrender what could not be taken forcibly, and they are beseeched to do so by politicians who value liberty about as much as Middle Eastern terrorists do. One of their favorite arguments, in fact, is that the United States must deny liberty to its people because our enemies deny liberty to theirs. The kindest thing that can be said of such politicians — and it is too kind, really — is that they misunderstand the country they are sworn to serve. Nonetheless, the House of Representatives has capitulated, approving 286 to 130 a constitutional amendment backed by President Bush and his party that would outlaw flag-burning. The amendment goes to the Senate next. Confused and intimidated, three members of the Arkansas House delegation voted for the amendment — Berry, Boozman, Ross. Only Rep. Vic Snyder voted “no.” How often does Vic Snyder show the best side of Arkansas to the nation? Very often indeed. It’s noteworthy that Snyder is the only veteran in the Arkansas delegation, having served as a Marine Corps rifleman in Vietnam. He has no inclination toward, or need for, the pretend-patriotism that some of his non-veteran colleagues adopt. The flag is a symbol, and like other symbols, it can’t be destroyed no matter how many times you put a match to it, how much cloth is consumed. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, explained it to the House bluntly: “If the flag needs protection at all, it needs protection from members of Congress who value the symbol more than the freedoms that the flag represents.” The true purpose of flag-burning is not to start a fire, but to inflame passions. It is a form of free speech, and as such, protected by the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The United States Supreme Court has so ruled. To protect unpopular speech is why we have a First Amendment, remember. The speech that everyone agrees with needs no protection. The true purpose of a ban on flag-burning is to stifle dissent. Nothing could be more un-American. This country was founded on dissent. Slaves were freed because of dissent, women enfranchised, law-breaking presidents removed from office. And when we have strayed furthest from our ideals, whether exterminating Indians, lynching blacks, or imprisoning Japanese-Americans, it is lack of dissent that has betrayed us.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Friday's open line

    The daily video and an open line.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • White flag waved on Trumpcare

    House Republicans pulled down the Trumpcare legislation this afternoon and walked out, depriving Democrats of some fun in pointing out all the anti-woman, anti-poor, pro-rich aspects of a bill too generous for hardcare Republicans and too mean for the few remaining moderates.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • Jones Bar-B-Q of Marianna has a related outpost in Jacksonville

    The legendary Jones Bar-B-Q Diner of Marianna is about to have a kissing cousin — supposedly with the same key recipes — in Jacksonville.
    • Mar 24, 2017
  • More »

More by Arkansas Times Staff

Most Shared

Latest in Editorials

  • The end of an era

    We're sad to report that Doug Smith has decided to retire. Though he's been listed as an associate editor on our masthead for the last 22 years, he has in fact been the conscience of the Arkansas Times. He has written all but a handful of our unsigned editorials since we introduced an opinion page in 1992.
    • May 8, 2014
  • A stand for equality

    Last week, Attorney General Dustin McDaniel became the first elected statewide official to express support for same-sex marriage. His announcement came days before Circuit Judge Chris Piazza is expected to rule on a challenge to the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Soon after, a federal challenge of the law is expected to move forward. McDaniel has pledged to "zealously" defend the Arkansas Constitution but said he wanted the public to know where he stood.
    • May 8, 2014
  • Same old, same old

    Remarking as we were on the dreariness of this year's election campaigns, we failed to pay sufficient tribute to the NRA, one of the most unsavory and, in its predictability, dullest of the biennial participants in the passing political parade.
    • May 1, 2014
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: More on pits

    • Well, aren't we the compassionate one - "own family members" can mean small children -…

    • on March 24, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Of course you don't care. If you cared, you might want to find a solution…

    • on March 24, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Enough! I don't care if it is the dog or the human factor. The end…

    • on March 24, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation