"History is always happening" at Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site
I am utterly amazed at your completely negative review of Brandon Campbell's Little Rock Fashion Week couture show. I found so many positive things about it that you somehow missed.
1.) The show started within minutes of the scheduled time. If you had read the information on the website, it said that the doors opened at 6:00, not that the show started at 6:00.
2.) The show had amazing talent and sponsors.
3.) He created business opportunities for a multitude of Arkansas companies that are proud to have played a part in this first venture.
4.) The event inspired young models to aspire to great things, gave them a sense of self confidence and an opportunity to be a part of a very positive event.
It is clear from your review that you were looking for things to complain about as evidenced by your “snarky remarks” to someone you didn't even know. You were obviously expecting food, which is not what the show was about nor was it ever advertised that there would be refreshments available. I was also surprised by your unkind remarks about Beth Hunt and Sway who are both well respected, professional people.
Little Rock should be proud of Brandon Campbell and his efforts. I know I am, and I look forward to supporting Little Rock Fashion Week next year and for years to come.
In an article in your Best of Arkansas issue you lamented the lost art of folding shirts at local dry cleaners. At Schickels Cleaners most employees are well trained in this practice; and we fold, bag and box dozens of shirts daily. I would suggest your editor visit us at either of our West Little Rock locations (11609 Cantrell or 201 N. Bowman), or our store at 102 Commerce in Maumelle. We'd be happy to accommodate your needs.
R. E. Zimmerman
We were reading your article in the Arkansas Times about Comet Cleaners. We are Hangers Dry Cleaners and I wanted to let you know of our services. We offer free pick-up and delivery services right to your home or office. We pride ourselves on producing the best folded shirt in the State. We have several experienced people who can operate our shirt folding system (including our General Manager).
We have six convenient locations in Little Rock, North Little Rock and Maumelle. We would love for you to try our services (especially our folded shirts!).
Customer service representative
Hangers Dry Cleaners
Reviewing the reviewer
Man, am I tired of reading the movie reviews in the Times. The reviewers NEVER seem to fully understand the films they are reviewing. Case in point: the review of “The Hurt Locker” written by Matthew Reed. “The Hurt Locker” is a fantastic war film, one that successfully resuscitates a dead concept in the modern-day war movie: war is truly hell. Mr. Reed tried to touch on this theme, and seemed to know it was there, but he went about it all wrong, not seeming to understand the film at all. In the review, Mr. Reed praises “Hurt Locker” as “the best war movie made since Full Metal Jacket,” and then proceeds to explain in broad, clumsy brush strokes as to why, completely brushing past the whole point of the movie.
I could go through the entire review, line by line, and show the reader the error of Mr. Reed's ways, but I will save everyone's time and simply encapsulate the whole thing into one debate point: the ending of the film. Now, I won't spoil anything for you, but what I can say is that Matthew Reed did NOT understand the ending scene of “The Hurt Locker,” and instead stated ignorantly “my biggest criticism would be the film's end ... it seemed rushed and tacked on.” Well, it may have “seemed” that way, Mr. Reed, but it was not. The ending of the film was the WHOLE POINT! Without giving it away, “The Hurt Locker” is a war film that shows the viewer ANOTHER angle on the “war is hell” argument, namely its potentially devastatingly addictive nature. The whole film begins not with a title or a list of actors, but with a quote that lingers for an extra moment: “war is a drug.” We are then treated to two hours of watching who we think is a renegade, doesn't-play-by-the-rules protagonist as he repeatedly, miraculously avoids certain catastrophe, proving to everyone what a hero he is. And yet that last scene, the very scene panned by the Times' reviewer, we witness a heart-breaking image that tells us we were all wrong: the protagonist is not a hero. He is an addict, no better than the meth-head down the block, and in fact, altogether much more reckless and dangerous to everyone. Maybe you should read other people's reviews first, Mr. Reed. Doing so might help point you in the right direction next time.
Are we Arkansas taxpayers paying for "her out-of-state travel for Trump" and the "entourage of…
This entire article is written with a flawed and assumed premise. That is, this article…
Isn't there a law that prevents public officials from campaigning on the job? Is she…