SOPA spells Internet ignorance 


It hasn't been as blatant a display of ignorance as the late Sen. Ted Stevens' description of the Internet as "a series of tubes," but a new bill moving swiftly through the U.S. House demonstrates that Congress still doesn't understand the web. The Stop Online Piracy Act — introduced in late October by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) and co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of 10 Democrats and 14 Republicans that includes Arkansas's favorite purveyor of wrong-headed reform, Rep. Tim Griffin — purports to protect American intellectual property, but would in fact curb online free expression and stifle Internet innovation. Every site that relies on user-generated content, from YouTube to Facebook to some site that doesn't yet exist, could be imperiled if it becomes law.

SOPA (and a companion bill in the Senate, the Protect IP Act, co-sponsored by Sen. John Boozman) is backed by a cartel of deep-pocketed foes of digital innovation, chiefly Hollywood and the music industry. Just as it did when it fought the tape recorder, the VCR and the mp3 player, the cartel is trying to protect its eroding business by stifling technology rather than embracing it. Make no mistake, online piracy is a significant problem, but not one that warrants undoing the Internet as we know it. And that's what ending the safe-harbor provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that gives immunity to sites that host user-generated content would accomplish.

Today, for instance, under the DMCA, when a mother posts a video of her baby dancing to Prince onto YouTube, it's Prince and his record label's responsibility to find and allege copyright infringement and order a takedown notice to YouTube (the bloodsuckers actually did that in 2007, though they ultimately lost a partial settlement to the mother, who filed a lawsuit against the label arguing that the music in the video was clearly fair use). SOPA would put the onus on YouTube and other websites to police their users and would require Internet Service Providers to inspect the traffic of all of its users. Search engines and ISPs would be required to block access to sites that host infringing content.

SOPA tries to whitewash its impact. The first clause of the bill says it shouldn't be "construed to impose a prior restraint on free speech." Though much of the bill claims to protect U.S. property from "foreign infringing sites," one of the most egregious provisions sets up a system to punish all sites, including those in the U.S., "dedicated to the theft of U.S. property."

Here's an example of how the system could work: Earlier this week, on our Arkansas Blog, we recounted the story of a woman who was attacked outside of Rave Motion Pictures theater in Little Rock by a man who tried to use a stun gun on her. The police report called the gun a Taser. The victim referred to it as a Taser. But a PR person from Taser International sent me an "URGENT headline & story correction" e-mail, pressing us to call the weapon a "stun gun" rather than a Taser, which is a registered trademark. We made an addendum to the post and put the word Taser in quotes in the headline. Under SOPA, if that move didn't satisfy Taser International, it could send a notice to Alternative Weekly Network, which sells, on our behalf, a percentage of our online ads, and allege that we had harmed its intellectual property. Just because of the allegation, even one as meritless as this hypothetical, AWN would be required to stop serving our ads within five days or risk legal action.

SOPA would have a chilling effect on free speech and, as a new study by the consulting firm Booz & Co. demonstrates, stifle investment in new user-generated sites. If this bill passes, say goodbye to the next Twitter, Facebook or YouTube. A start-up could never weather the cost.

Last week after getting pilloried by commenters, Tim Griffin defended the bill on Facebook of all places with this nonsense: "This bill provides a simple, straightforward and constitutional means to protect our nation's copyright holders from theft."


Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Lindsey Millar

  • The Dexter Suggs' No Good, Very Bad Week Edition

    Gov. Asa Hutchinson’s appointment of two special justices to hear an offshoot of the same-sex marriage case who have obvious conflicts, Hillary Clinton’s presidential candidacy, Dexter Suggs’ no good, very bad week, the Little Rock Board of Directors and a nondiscrimination ordinance and the Pulaski County school desegregation case — all covered on this week's edition.
    • Apr 17, 2015
  • The Arkansas Supreme Court Gone Wild Edition

    Open warfare between members of the Arkansas Supreme Court surrounding the long-delayed same-sex marriage case, Gov. Asa Hutchinson and protecting LGBT people from discrimination, and new Education Commissioner Johnny Key and the Little Rock School District — all covered on this week's podcast.
    • Apr 10, 2015
  • More »

Most Shared

Latest in Media

  • UA cozy with D-G columnist

    An interesting element of the ongoing story of budget problems in the University of Arkansas Advancement Division has been a divide in outlook in the pages of the state's dominant news medium, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
    • Nov 21, 2013
  • Democrat-Gazette covers one of its own in story of reporter Cathy Frye's rescue

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's reports on the rescue of its reporter Cathy Frye, who was missing for days in the hot scrubby desert that is Big Bend Ranch State Park, are gripping.
    • Oct 10, 2013
  • Hodge shares his OA vision

    Roger Hodge, the new editor of Oxford American magazine, talked about his rise at Harper's, his writing philosophy and his plans for the OA before a full crowd last Wednesday at the Clinton School.
    • Sep 26, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  

Most Viewed

  • An Arkansas legislative session full of misplaced priorities

    Communities like Gould, where I am chief of police, need help from lawmakers. But lawmakers delivered very little of what Gould needs: namely jobs, opportunity and meaningful education improvements. Our families and our neighbors are still wondering when they will be the priority of lawmakers.
  • Miles to go on equal rights

    A couple of disparate events prompt me to reflect on progress toward equality.
  • The Obama doctrine

    If he accomplished nothing else during his presidency, Barack Obama has surely earned a place in the Bad Political Analogies Hall of Fame.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The Obama doctrine

    • In today's world a country using nukes against another country that has nukes is suicide…

    • on April 17, 2015
  • Re: The Obama doctrine

    • Remove Israel's nuclear arsenal and you would have no Israel. When one side has the…

    • on April 17, 2015
  • Re: An Arkansas legislative session full of misplaced priorities

    • The city of Gould doesn't need the help of law makers. They need to learn…

    • on April 17, 2015

© 2015 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation