Favorite

Kerry in Wonderland 

Never can one imagine there having been a campaign that produced so much magical irony. A decorated veteran who volunteered for combat and who still carries the wounds of his bravery must defend his honor and patriotism against a rich frat boy who, when his own time came, pulled strings to stay safe in the bosom of the Texas Air National Guard. A president who piles up the largest budget and trade deficits in the nation's history runs as a fiscal conservative, and it is his opponent, who opposed the policies that caused them, who gets credit for being reckless. A president with the second worst economic numbers in 100 years convinces voters that the good times will be over if he isn't re-elected. And the legions who claim to be guided by what Jesus would do follow a politician who scorned the poor, added to the burdens of the heavily laden and turned the government into a trough for the rich, the privileged and the private interests. John Kerry must bear some blame for letting this happen to him. But here is the most bewildering paradox of all. He is being blamed for not having a ready and convincing solution to the debacle in Iraq or the other horrifying problems that George W. Bush bequeathed the country in three and a half years. The first Republican playbook was to cast the Democratic nominee, whoever it would be, as wishy-washy, the one quality that in such parlous times might unnerve voters even more than a rash and bumbling president. Now, it is that the nation must stick with the man who made all the blunders because Kerry doesn't have a brilliant plan for reversing them. The commentators, parroting the Republican talking points, demand every night to know what Kerry's plan is for getting out of Iraq. It is true that neither Kerry nor anyone else has a plausible course change for Iraq, where U.S. planes, tanks and rockets are turning the ancient cityscapes into rubble and the most westernized people in the Muslim world into rabble. Almost everyone, including the CIA and leading Republican senators, acknowledges now that Iraq is a disaster almost beyond hope. President Bush is counting on its being enough for people to know that we have overthrown one of the world's many petty dictators. Not enough of them will ask by election day whether it is worth the price that they are paying - by year's end nearly 10,000 dead and wounded U.S. soldiers and civilians and the loss of more than $200 billion in treasure, the surviving wounded and the families of the dead left to suffer to the end of their days. And it is only the beginning. Kerry says he will talk former U.S. allies and Middle Eastern countries into helping. He will find more receptive ears than will George Bush, who is held in contempt in most of the world's capitals, but what chance is there really that any nation now will send a solitary soul to Iraq? Kerry will train more Iraqi soldiers and actually use the money that Bush asked for to rebuild the infrastructure that we have obliterated. But anarchy makes both unrealistic. There is hardly a major city outside Baghdad and Basra where one or another insurgent group does not have sway. It should be enough for Senator Kerry to say that he will be a far wiser leader than Bush, that he will not squander the lives and futures of men and women or endanger the nation's security on a whim, that he will not heedlessly cast aside the advice of diplomats and wise soldiers, as Bush has done at every turn. That is Kerry's message but he seems unable to articulate it in a credible way. Kerry got into the predicament by a weak response to the charge that he waffled on Iraq by voting for the war in 2002 and against spending $87 billion in 2003 to support the troops. The truth would have demolished Bush. Kerry voted to give the president the authority to go to war with international support if Saddam Hussein refused to permit arms inspectors, conditions that Bush ignored. And it was Bush who threatened a veto if the troops were supported in the right way. Kerry voted to spend $87 billion for the war by paying for it, like every other previous wartime president, in this case by rolling back the tax cuts for the rich. Bush insisted that the $87 billion and all the war funding since then be put on the credit card by taking the money from Social Security trust funds and by borrowing from China and Japan. If you believe that is wise and patriotic, Kerry should have said, then George Bush is your man.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Guns, God and gays

    Many more mass shootings like the one last week in Roseburg, Ore., will stain the future and no law will pass that might reduce the carnage. That is not a prediction but a fact of life that is immune even to Hillary Clinton.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015
  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Worse than N.C.'s bathroom bill

    SB 774 extends birth certificate requirement to bathrooms in all public facilities, and that's an original birth certificate, too.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: More on pits

    • Of course you don't care. If you cared, you might want to find a solution…

    • on March 24, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Enough! I don't care if it is the dog or the human factor. The end…

    • on March 24, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Well, news article require facts, something the Lyin's isn't too good about. As for opinion,…

    • on March 24, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation