Favorite

Kerrying Iowa: Dean in the tank 

We knew by last weekend that the Iowa caucuses would do a little rewriting of the script in the Democratic presidential race. We did not know they would render moot all that had gone before. We knew Howard Dean had become shop-worn after months of attacks, scrutiny and blunder. We knew John Kerry and John Edwards were on the move. We knew that Iowans who could not abide George W. Bush had initially embraced Dean for his anti-war ferocity. But we sensed they were beginning to ponder whether the best way to hurt Bush might be to nominate a candidate seemingly more electable than the polarizing, stereotyped Dean. That would be Kerry because he's a war hero and Edwards because he's a Southerner. We knew Dean still had the endorsement of Iowa's beloved senator, Tom Harkin. We figured he would be forced into something resembling a three-way tie and emerge wounded, but with plenty of money and backing to recover to fend off Wesley Clark in New Hampshire. We thought these would be moments in the sun for Kerry and Edwards, after which Kerry would fade because he's simply not that scintillating and Edwards would fade because he's inexperienced. We were still thinking Dean vs. Clark, the latter of whom had been lured into the race as the Democratic establishment began looking for an anti-Dean because Kerry and Edwards had been early busts. But we could not have known that Kerry would end up with twice as many delegates as Dean and that Edwards almost would. We could not have known that Dean's third-place finish with not quite 18 percent would be less impressive than Michael Dukakis' third-place finish to Dick Gephardt and the late Paul Simon in Iowa in 1988, when Dukakis got 22 percent. And we could not possibly have known that Dean would perform a "Dukakis in the tank" kind of moment with a maniacal screaming speech to supporters afterward. He may merely have been trying to rally the troops. But he came off as so wild that at the least his antics will become late-night talk show fodder. At the most they will scare the daylights out of New Hampshire voters who had been inclined to support him. Before going further, we must keep in mind that seemingly momentous things like this have happened before in Iowa, only to become ancient history a week later in New Hampshire. They've happened twice, to be precise. In 1980 George Bush the elder upset Ronald Reagan in Iowa and proclaimed he had "bigmo." Then he and Reagan went to New Hampshire where Reagan wiped him out. And, as mentioned, Gephardt won Iowa in 1988, but Dukakis swept New Hampshire a week later. People wonder what all this means to Clark. We have two absolutely conflicting schools of thought. One is that Clark was second to Dean in the polls in New Hampshire and now stands to shoot to the top in the Granite State. But the other is that Kerry pre-empted Clark's anti-Dean role in Iowa and that Edwards' renewed vitality threatens Clark's role as the designated Southerner going into the big races Feb. 3 in South Carolina and Oklahoma. Clark's job was simpler when all he had to do was beat Dean, who had many negatives. Now he finds himself in hand-to-hand combat with two guys who came upon his flanks under radar. History has shown that Iowa doesn't decide the race, but merely begins to define it. You need to wait for New Hampshire. Then you might even need to wait for South Carolina. At any rate, a few days ago Dean was the presumptive nominee and Clark was the only candidate who might stop him. Today there are three possible nominees - Kerry, Clark, Dean - and maybe even a fourth in Edwards. It may be that we'll simply have to wait and see.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist resigns

    Bob Scoggin, 50, the Department of Arkansas Heritage archeologist whose job it was to review the work of agencies, including DAH and the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, for possible impacts on historic properties, resigned from the agency on Monday. Multiple sources say Scoggin, whom they describe as an "exemplary" employee who the week before had completed an archeological project on DAH property, was told he would be fired if he did not resign.
  • Trump proposes an unconstitutional ban on flag burning, revoking citizenship

    Donald Trump, the president-elect of the United States, this morning made a public statement, via Twitter, that the flag burning should be disallowed by law: "there must be consequences — perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!"
  • Child welfare too often about 'punishing parents,' DCFS consultant tells legislators

    Reforms promised by the Division of Children and Family Services are "absolutely necessary," the president of DCFS's independent consultant told a legislative committee this morning. But they still may not be enough to control the state's alarming growth in foster care cases.
  • Donald Trump taps Tom Price for HHS Secretary; Medicaid and Medicare cuts could be next

    The selection of Tom Price as HHS secretary could signal that the Trump administration will dismantle the current healthcare safety net, both Medicaid and Medicare.
  • Fake economics

    Fake news is a new phenomenon in the world of politics and policy, but hokey economic scholarship has been around as long as Form 1040 and is about as reliable as the news hoaxes that enlivened the presidential campaign.

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Learn about one of the wildest oil booms in history in Smackover

Learn about one of the wildest oil booms in history in Smackover

This small south Arkansas city was once one of the top oil producers in the nation.

Event Calendar

« »

December

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Most Viewed

  • Arkansas Democrats' rocky road forward

    No state political party in the modern era has had a more abrupt fall than Arkansas's Democrats
  • Fake economics

    Fake news is a new phenomenon in the world of politics and policy, but hokey economic scholarship has been around as long as Form 1040 and is about as reliable as the news hoaxes that enlivened the presidential campaign.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation