Favorite

Looking for meaning in Huckabee reruns 

Judgment and ethics emerge as attributes to ponder now that Mike Huckabee might become president. For the moment, fresh national media reporting condenses this discussion to a pair of old Arkansas dramas.

Before getting to those: There was a dustup over the weekend about Huckabee's backward and perhaps not altogether abandoned thinking on gays from 1992. As a failed candidate for the U.S. Senate that year, Huckabee seemed to want to quarantine AIDS sufferers.

That shouldn't hurt him in the Iowa Republican caucuses, which, don't forget, offered a sufficient kook-right base to award a first-place plurality to Pat Robertson in 1988. At the least it will offset any of Huckabee's problems with that base owing to his glimpses of compassion and reason on illegal immigration.

So back to the two dramas: One centers on Wayne Dumond, whom Huckabee wanted out of prison, and who, once out, raped again and killed. The other is Action America, the secretive nonprofit organization that Huckabee set up while lieutenant governor to raise private funds with which he paid himself to give speeches.

Now Newsweek parachutes into the state and gets a couple of former Huckabee allies to reveal that one of the previously undisclosed donors to Action America, to the tune of $40,000, was tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds.

As required by law, Huckabee always reported his income from Action America, which ran about $71,000 in less than two years. But he would never identify the persons or groups actually donating the money to this nonprofit entity. That put an elected public official in the rather brazen position of being secretly underwritten.

Huckabee's detractors cite these matters and call him a crook or a near-equivalent. Huckabee defenders say he is a righteous man victimized by overheated and unfair partisan criticism.

But Huckabee is neither a crook nor a victim. He is a man with a pronounced chip on his shoulder stemming from a lower-middle-class upbringing and perpetual underdog minority political status in a largely one-party state.

Sometimes he uses his humble origins and outsider status as justification for his own questionable behavior regarding gifts and income. And he lets his religion, which provides his genuinely compassionate side, to lead him into overly simplistic, overly combative and overly dramatic moral judgments and declarations.

In Dumond, Huckabee was compassionate toward a man he believed to have suffered too much through an inordinately long prison sentence and getting castrated by masked intruders.

Huckabee saw corrupt “Delta justice,” a supposed oxymoron that Republicans and media cynics like to use contemptuously in regard to the good ol' boy culture of eastern Arkansas. And he saw the Dumond affair as all mixed up in supposed Clintonian political machinations, in part because Dumond's victim was a distant cousin of Bill Clinton.

For good measure, Dumond was claiming through a preacher colleague of Huckabee to have found Jesus. So you had the redemption factor, always powerful with Huckabee.

As lieutenant governor in 1994, Huckabee didn't have any money and he had three kids staring down college. His political ambition had landed him in that nothing part-time office paying only $24,000.

He probably should have thought about the financial inadequacies before running. Perhaps he did; maybe he had the scheme in mind all along.

He had pals round up benefactors to pay him on the side through this so-called Action America. The payments were for what he called a legitimate professional private-sector purpose — his own speechmaking.

The issue is whether R.J. Reynolds would have shoveled money to a speaker who was not in elected public office. The issue is cashing in the public trust.

Huckabee pointed out that Democratic lawyers in the Legislature, Mike Beebe among them, disclosed only their general income through their law firms without listing specific clients. What was the difference?

It was a decent if not compelling question. But Huckabee's professed morality did not persuade him to be better. Instead he invoked as cover the prevailing behavior of others.

The Dumond matter raises worthy questions about Huckabee's ability or willingness to think beyond what his moral and partisan instincts tell him. The tobacco issue raises equally worthy questions about the chip on his shoulder and a rationalized sense of entitlement.

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

More by Fritz Brantley

  • He talks, and talks, the talk

    A fellow posted an old newspaper article on his blog about a Mike Huckabee speech to a religious group in 1998. A friend faxed the article to me, then called to ask if I’d yet read it, which I had.
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • The incredible shrinking Huckabee

    Plus: COPS!
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • Going whole hog

    A Q&A with irreverent Arkansas-raised comedian Matt Besser
    • Dec 20, 2007
  • More »

Most Shared

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: More on pits

    • Yes, here are many "people who shouldn't be allowed near a dog." Fine. But that…

    • on March 26, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • "the breed's propensity for unprovoked and deadly attacks on animals and people" This is nonsense…

    • on March 26, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Well, for heaven's sake.

    • on March 26, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation