Partial credit 

The Arkansas Supreme Court made a couple of large decisions recently. It got one right. The judges were unanimously correct in reversing a circuit court ruling that the state Freedom of Information Act is unconstitutional. The lower court said in a public-meeting case that the Act was too vague and overbroad. The Supreme Court said that any changes needed in the law could be made by the legislature. "The FOIA does not attempt to give an exact description of every conceivable fact situation that might give rise to the application of the FOIA," the court said. "It is left to the judiciary to give effect to the intent of the legislature ... This court liberally construes the FOIA to accomplish its broad and laudable purpose that public business be performed in an open and public manner."

The Court erred in holding that the state cannot take excess property-tax revenue from wealthy school districts and use it to subsidize poorer districts. The state requires a minimum 25-mill property tax for every district, but because of varying property values, the tax produces more revenue in some districts than others. The state also requires a minimum expenditure for each pupil. If the 25-mill tax doesn't raise enough money to reach that figure, the state makes up the difference. If the tax produces more than enough, the state wants to send that excess to poorer districts.

The thrust of the education-reform movement in Arkansas over the last decade has been to equalize opportunity for all students. Nonetheless, a four-member court majority held that rich districts can keep their excess revenue. In a dissent joined by two others, Chief Justice Jim Hannah wrote:

"The majority nullifies ten years of difficult and painstaking work diligently undertaken by the General Assembly, the Department of Education, the Attorney General, and the Governor, to provide this state with a constitutional school-funding system. ... The majority leaves us with a public-school-funding system dependent upon the wealth of the district, which this court has declared to be unconstitutional."

Speaking of Arkansas Supreme Court

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Latest in Editorials

  • Misquoted

    There's embarrassment in the young gubernatorial campaign of state Rep. Debra Hobbs of Rogers. Announcing her candidacy last week, Representative Hobbs said "I feel like this is what God wants me to do." But sources close to God say that He gave her no encouragement and was at most indifferent to her campaign.
    • May 23, 2013
  • Say goodbye

    It's kind of piling on, admittedly, but we feel compelled to join the call for state Treasurer Martha Shoffner to resign. Awkwardly compelled, that is. She has not yet been convicted of the criminal charges filed against her, and that's an important point. The presumption of innocence has not been repealed.
    • May 23, 2013
  • Listen, UA

    Any public-university trustees considering merger of their tax-supported teaching hospital with a Catholic hospital should ponder these wise words from Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
    • May 16, 2013
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »

May

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
  • Re: The crash of Martha Shoffner

    • Now, Maxine, if Martha Shoffner were a Republican, you know you wouldn't be sad about…

    • on May 24, 2013
  • Re: Say goodbye

    • Because Dustin McDaniel is a law abiding SOS? How dare he speak out after his…

    • on May 24, 2013
  • Re: The crash of Martha Shoffner

    • I don't see sadness either. Every day the Lord sends the criminal justice incarcerates a…

    • on May 23, 2013
 

© 2013 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation