Favorite

President Clark? 

No month goes by that does not affirm some bit of the educated wisdom that warned President Bush not to invade Iraq in the first place. Within weeks of the invasion, the U.S. military proved what all the real experts, including the weapons inspectors from America’s Scott Ritter forward, told them, that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and not even Bush’s famous fallback, “weapons of mass destruction-related program activities.” Iraq had little capacity to threaten its neighbors, the Clinton administration having wiped out the air force and weakened the infantry and armed divisions so far that they could hardly have invaded Jordan. It was quickly apparent that, as the foreign-policy establishment warned, American alliances would be weakened, U.S. standing in the world undermined, the Middle East destabilized, Islamic extremism and terrorism fueled, the Muslim country torn apart by sectarian strife, and U.S. military forces stretched so thin that we could not influence far more dangerous situations like Iran and North Korea. Now comes virtual confirmation of the last dire prewar warning, that the occupation of Iraq would in the end reverse the one thing we sort of liked about Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime: It at least was secular. He hated Islamic radicals although his handling of them was hardly admirable. He tortured them and slew their families. President Bush promised to see to it that Iraq would have a democratic and secular government. The proposed new Iraqi constitution, praised by Bush, declares that the country will be an Islamic state and that no law can be passed that does not comply with Islamic rules, which shall be the source of all legislation. The Shia delegates satisfied the American advisers by including lip service to civil liberties far down in the document, including an Iraqi version of the Equal Rights Amendment, but Iraqi women know that it is useless pablum. Owing to all these predictable failings, President Bush’s poll numbers are about the lowest in history for this period in his presidency. Most Americans believe the war was a mistake and a third of them think the United States should pull out its troops. Where does that leave the Democrats in Congress, who by and large embraced war with Iraq as the first option and who, with rare but growing exceptions, still defend the war and the president’s stay-the-course strategy? Should not the same opprobrium be attached to those of either party who embraced and impelled the most destructive foreign-policy blunder in the last 80 years? Knowing what the consequences of the war were likely to be, they did it because they feared the chance that Bush might actually be successful and could pin them with being unpatriotic and soft on terrorism. Here is a proposal for Democrats: They should place a special burden on those who supported Bush and voted for the war resolution in 2002 before considering them for leadership, including the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. They must somehow dispel that lack of judgment or courage. Silence or timid criticisms of the president’s war-making tactics would not be enough. The list would include the hapless John Kerry and John Edwards, the 2004 Democratic team, and, yes, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who embraced Bush’s prewar lies almost as strongly as any Republican. Being brilliant and moderately progressive does not give her a pass on the overriding issue of her time in the Senate. And it would include Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, the single semi-declared presidential candidate in 2008. Biden expects the issue to be behind him by 2008. He said last week he expected Bush, contrary to the president’s vows, to pull the troops out of Iraq by the end of next year if Iraq has not been stabilized. That would leave two viable candidates among the current prospects, Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin and our own Gen. Wesley Clark, the former supreme NATO commander who, after a rough start, has argued consistently against the war but for strategies that might actually help Bush succeed. Feingold, who almost alone in the U.S. Senate yokes his votes to his conscience, cast one of the 23 Senate votes against empowering Bush to attack Iraq and now proposes that the United States declare its intentions to withdraw American forces by the end of next year and leave the country in the hands of the elected government and its own security forces. He is so far all alone. Clark is more diplomatic. Alone among all the politicians of either party — and that includes the entire Bush administration — he has outlined a plan for pacifying the factions and stabilizing the country that actually could make Bush a prophet. But, writing on the op-ed page of the Washington Post last week, he sounded fatalistic. “President Bush and his team,” Clark wrote, “are repeating the failure of Vietnam: failing to craft a realistic and effective policy and instead simply demanding that the American people show resolve. Resolve isn’t enough to mend a flawed approach — or to save the lives of our troops. If the administration won’t adopt a winning strategy, then the American people will be justified in demanding that it bring our troops home.” In the end, both men will be prophets with honor in their party — and a good ticket.
Favorite

From the ArkTimes store

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Little Rock District Judge Alice Lightle plans to resign

    Little Rock District Judge Alice Lightle, who oversees the criminal division of district court, has notified Gov. Asa Hutchinson of her intention to resign the post effective April 30.
    • Mar 27, 2017
  • Lawsuit seeks to halt executions

    A federal lawsuit was filed today to stop the eight executions of Death Row inmates over a 10-day span in April.
    • Mar 27, 2017
  • Senate committee again rejects birth certificate equity

    A Senate committee has again rejected Sen. Joyce Elliott's bill — modeled after a suggestion in court proceedings by the attorney general's office — to provide equal treatment of same-sex married couples in issuance of birth certificates.
    • Mar 27, 2017
  • More »

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Guns, God and gays

    Many more mass shootings like the one last week in Roseburg, Ore., will stain the future and no law will pass that might reduce the carnage. That is not a prediction but a fact of life that is immune even to Hillary Clinton.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015
  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: More on pits

    • Poor Investigator, no better than Clouseau at exposing the facts. You mistake compassion for patience…

    • on March 27, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Wait, children aren't just Scooby Snacks? I suggest we not limit our freedoms to what…

    • on March 27, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Yes, here are many "people who shouldn't be allowed near a dog." Fine. But that…

    • on March 26, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation