Favorite

Saul, meet Helen Thomas 

Unlike King Saul, President Bush knew that he was not consulting with the Witch of Endor when he called on Helen Thomas at his famous news conference last week, but the result might have been the same.

Saul heard what he did not want to hear from the banished witch, which was that the Philistines would defeat him. Bush knew that the 85-year-old White House correspondent, who has called him the worst president in history, would ask a nasty question and be downright pesky about it. And he squashed her, cutting her off sternly when she tried to force him to answer her question, to the delight of his attending advisers, who obviously had counseled it.

The media played it up as a great Bush PR triumph. The curmudgeonly Thomas has never been popular in White Houses or the press corps owing to her shrewish questioning of presidents and press secretaries and her chiding of the media for not holding presidents and their spokesmen to account for their lies and dodges.

But the question she put to the president was the most vital one of this young century, and what she got was a flagrant lie. None of the media reported it as such, but history will record it that way. Thomas noted that thousands of Americans and Iraqis had died and far more wounded for life, and she wanted to know the real reason that Bush “wanted” to invade Iraq since all the reasons that he had previously given proved to be unwarranted.

It was a particularly relevant question in light of the latest of a string of secret Downing Street memos written by aides to Tony Blair on the two leaders’ conversations leading up to the war, which have gotten scant attention in this country since they came to light. While publicly proclaiming that war depended on the actions of Saddam Hussein, Bush was telling Blair that he was going to war on March 10 whatever happened. (The United States invaded on March 19.)

Bush talked about painting an American U-2 reconnaissance plane in United Nations colors so that when the Iraqis fired at the plane it would give the two leaders a trigger to invade. Other nations, Bush said, might be brought around to supporting the war and voting for a war resolution at the United Nations. Bush had to invade without the resolution.

“I didn’t want war,” Bush responded to Thomas. He said after the 9/11 attacks he was going to make sure that “we didn’t provide safe haven to an enemy.” He began to talk about hiding and training al Qaeda recruits. Thomas tried to interrupt to point out that she asked about Iraq, not Afghanistan. After repeated interruptions, Bush finally added, “I also saw a threat in Iraq.” He recalled that the UN Security Council resolution called on Saddam Hussein to disarm. “And when he chose to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult decision to make to remove him,” Bush said.

It was a variation of his previous explanations that he went to war because Saddam would not allow UN inspectors in the country to check for weapons of mass destruction.

Memories seem short, so let’s review. From the front pages of American newspapers:

On Nov. 27, 2002, nearly four months before the invasion, UN weapons inspectors re-entered Iraq. Saddam insisted that he had eliminated all unconventional weapons and had no nuclear program, although we now know that some of his generals assumed that he was lying, maybe because they trusted the Bush administration, which said he was.

On Feb. 27 Iraq agreed to destroy its little stockpile of al-Samoud 2 short-range missiles, which inspectors said slightly exceeded the range limits imposed after the first gulf war on some test firings. The next day, UN inspectors filmed the destruction of the first four, and it continued until the inspectors had to flee ahead of U.S. bombs.

The first week of March, UN inspection chiefs Mohammed elBaradei and Hans Blix, in an extensive report, said they had easy access to all potential sites and did not believe unconventional weapons existed any longer nor was there an active nuclear program, which the chief U.S. inspector, Capt. Scott Ritter, had already concluded and which American inspectors after the invasion verified. ElBaradei and Blix said they would like documentary evidence of the destruction of the weapons and hoped to get it through interviews with Iraqis who were in charge and actually did it.

Blix’s brief mention of a drone caused a flurry in Washington. The Bush administration said Blix underplayed the drone because it could deliver some of that (nonexistent) 500 pounds of deadly sarin gas on Israel. Reporters got to examine the drone and described it as a laughably crude thing that was little better than a child’s kite.

On March 16, Bush and Cheney ridiculed a request from European nations for a one-month delay for inspections to show more results.

On March 17, Bush gave Saddam 48 hours to leave Iraq with his sons. Word went to Kofi Annan at the UN, and he ordered the inspectors to get out immediately.

On March 19, the bombs fell.

History and theologians treated the Witch of Endor more kindly than they did King Saul.

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Guns, God and gays

    Many more mass shootings like the one last week in Roseburg, Ore., will stain the future and no law will pass that might reduce the carnage. That is not a prediction but a fact of life that is immune even to Hillary Clinton.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015
  • No tax help for Trump

    The big conundrum is supposed to be why Donald Trump does so well among white working-class people, particularly men, who do not have a college education.
    • Aug 11, 2016

Most Shared

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Attack the poor

    If there is a unifying motif to the labors of Congress and the Arkansas legislature this spring it is to make life harder and existence more intolerable for the poor.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • Nixon's EPA

    Poor Richard Nixon would be so hurt, and baffled. He went to his grave knowing that while his historical reputation was in tatters owing to the deceptions and corruption of Watergate, he at least could lay claim to a few of the great advances in human rights in Western history.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Trumpcare

    Ignorance may not exactly be bliss, President Trump and a lot of other politicians are discovering, but it is a good operating model as long as wisdom doesn't rear its ugly head.
    • Mar 9, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Forest bathing is the Next Big Thing

Arkansas is the perfect place to try out this new health trend. Read all about the what, why, where and how here.

Event Calendar

« »

March

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Don't cry for Robert E. Lee

    • Thank you Max. Wonderful, pointedly (if that is a word) laying out what is so…

    • on March 25, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Well, aren't we the compassionate one - "own family members" can mean small children -…

    • on March 24, 2017
  • Re: More on pits

    • Of course you don't care. If you cared, you might want to find a solution…

    • on March 24, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation