Sexy targets 

The Washington Post devoted more than 800 words and section-front space to an article analyzing the fact that U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton wore a blouse on the Senate floor that exposed a tiny bit of cleavage. The writer suggested that the senator had sent an ambivalent message by not showing more. I suppose I should be grateful the “serious press” — this writer has won a Pulitzer Prize — has found something besides John Edwards’ haircut to write about.

More substantive, but also sex-related, was the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision to knock a hole in the state Freedom of Information Act. It said a judge should review a former Pulaski County comptroller’s county e-mail record piece by piece to see what is truly personal and perhaps not subject to release. In this case, the personal is unavoidably public. The comptroller had a sexual relationship with a vendor of software services and spent public money on that relationship. A review of ALL his e-mail is one way to help establish exactly how much may have been misappropriated – for example for travel that was not official business. The four-member court majority seems awfully concerned about protecting people who do private business on the public’s dime. Wonder who the justices have been e-mailing and texting?

U.S. Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana would be safe in Arkansas calling or texting prostitutes from a public phone, thanks to the Arkansas Supreme Court. But isn’t making a call to facilitate a criminal act a matter of public interest? The problem now is that a judge reviewing public phone records could not be expected to know such an interest might lie at the heart of an FOI request. Those seeking public records will have to reveal motives to reach seemingly personal information that might have a bearing on public performance.

This isn’t sexy, but it’s important. People who profess to be anxious to get the Little Rock School District out of court have now filed three legal actions requiring more court time and legal expenses. In the latest — and lamest — lawyer Jess Askew argued that his clients should be allowed to intervene in the School Board’s decision to attempt to mediate a settlement with lawyer John Walker over desegregation issues. One stated reason: because John Walker has too much influence on the School Board. This is a cause of legal action? If so, where was Askew’s intervention when Arkansas Democrat-Gazette publisher Walter Hussman was working secret deals with school administrators and the Gang of Five that then controlled the School Board? Silly question. Hussman is one of Askew’s clients. It’s different when a man of such obvious good taste is the School Board puppeteer. Askew’s clients just don’t like democracy when they’re on the losing side. I don’t like some of the recent board decisions either. But I understand the rules. You don’t like a School Board’s decisions, you elect different board members. That’s how a Gang of Five white folks became a four-member black majority last year. I have to observe that black folks didn’t whine nearly so much when they were in the minority.



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • The education legislature

    Republican political control in Arkansas means many things: lots of gun bills, lots of anti-abortion bills, lots of efforts to make religious belief law, such as discrimination against gay people.
    • Mar 10, 2015
  • Supremely discredited

    Arkansas Supreme Court Justice Rhonda Wood and her allies continue to discredit the state's highest court.
    • Jul 30, 2015
  • Hutchinson pulls Faubus move

    I don't know what if anything might arise or be planned in the future relative to Gov. Asa Hutchinson's order to end Medicaid reimbursement for medical services (not abortion) provided by Planned Parenthood in Arkansas.
    • Aug 20, 2015

Most Shared

Latest in Max Brantley

  • Trumped in Arkansas

    After two solid debates and the release of a video and corroborating testimony that further confirmed the misogyny of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton is favored to win the presidential election Nov. 8
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • So many provocations...

    Another bad week demands a Worst Of listing.
    • Oct 6, 2016
  • State university secrets

    Today's subject: lack of accountability at state universities.
    • Sep 29, 2016
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

Five Fun Fall Activities

Five Fun Fall Activities

Autumn temps are perfect for outdoor activities

Event Calendar

« »


2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Arkansas 2016: the microclimate election

    In the lead-up to the past four Arkansas election cycles, the forecast has been a fairly simple one: strong winds blowing in the GOP direction.
  • The big loser

    So now the big crybaby says he's losing because his opponent is crooked and the referees are blind.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Trumped in Arkansas

    • What a funny article, I hope sarcasm was your intent! First, since this was written…

    • on October 23, 2016
  • Re: The big loser

    • We are leaving in 3 hours. An I never said that anybody said I DID…

    • on October 22, 2016
  • Re: The big loser

    • Here's some more information for the investigator from the Enquirer. It's a confession from somebody…

    • on October 21, 2016

© 2016 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation