Of everything to come out of the Cycle Breakers probation program run by
former Circuit Judge Willard Proctor Jr. — the program that eventually
cost him his judgeship last month — one aspect is sure to haunt the
Pulaski County prosecuting attorney's office for years to come: what
prosecutors characterize as “dozens and dozens” of record expungements
made by Proctor during his years on the bench.
Most of these expungements, they say, were made without notification of
the prosecuting attorney's office, and were often extended to those
whose crime or remaining sentence made their records ineligible
John Johnson is the chief deputy prosecuting attorney of Pulaski County.
He said there is a procedure for seeking expungement that often wasn't
followed in Proctor's court. The way the process is supposed to work,
Johnson said, is that those who have been convicted of a crime file a
request for expungement with the county clerk. The prosecutor's office
is then allowed to formally respond. A hearing is set, and then both
prosecutors and the defendant are allowed to make their cases for and
against expunging — or “sealing” — the record.
“What was happening was that the expungements were going to the judge,”
Johnson said. “People would just turn them in straight to the judge, as
opposed to filing them in the clerk's office. Then he'd just enter an
order and the order would never make it over to us.”
In recent years, prosecutors began seeing defendants in court who
claimed to have had their records expunged — defendants they had
convicted in prior cases. In most of the cases that were inappropriately
expunged, Johnson said, defendants were ineligible because they hadn't
completed their criminal probation. Under Arkansas law, only those who
have been pardoned or who have successfully completed the terms of their
probation — including the time they are required to spend under state
supervision — are eligible for expungement of their record. In many
cases, Proctor would allow a defendant to complete the restitution and
fines portion of his or her probation, then would expunge the record
before moving the defendant into the Cycle Breakers “civil probation”
program. The Supreme Court has said there was no provision in the law
for a civil probation program.
Had those cases been brought to the attention of the prosecuting
attorney's office prior to expungement, Johnson said, prosecutors would
have surely objected because “probation is part of the punishment.”
Since prosecutors began actively looking into the records of those who
passed through Proctor's court, close to a hundred cases in which
records were secretly expunged have been uncovered, and there are likely
many more that will never be found. That's because when a record is
expunged, even typing the defendant's name into a computer at the
prosecutor's office can't bring up details of the case. In most cases,
only when the specific case number is typed into the system does the
sealed record appear, and then lists the information, including the
defendant's name and crime, only as “expunged.”
“What happens is that if it's expunged and then they commit these new
offenses, a lot of times you would want to know who the previous victims
were,” Johnson said. “It makes it harder to find that out. It reduces
the amount of penalty if they re-offend; it keeps them from being placed
in a habitual status in a lot of cases. If we don't know about it, we
don't know to enhance the penalties that are available because you've
committed these other crimes.”
Johnson said there is no one set way of describing what was going on
with regard to Proctor's record sealing, because almost every case
they've encountered was handled differently. “The variations on the
theme were just endless,” Johnson said. “There was a guy who was
convicted of a violent offense and Proctor didn't enter judgment for
months and months.” Finally, Johnson said, Proctor reduced the charge to
a misdemeanor — possibly because those convicted of violent felonies
aren't eligible for expungement without a pardon — which made the
defendant's record eligible. The record was expunged, and the man was
then moved into the Cycle Breakers program.
Vann Smith is the administrative judge over the 6th Judicial District.
Judge Smith said that he is aware of Proctor's records expungements, and
expects it's an issue the new judge who takes over the 5th Division,
Ernest Sanders, will have to look into further once seated.
Smith said he was surprised at the number of expungements Proctor
ordered during his time on the bench, “even though I don't know why I
should be surprised,” Smith said. “I'm hoping that this Cycle Breakers
program will be closed down and all these probationers will be shifted
over to the state.”
“The bottom line,” John Johnson said, “is that you want the punishment
of a crime to mean something. If everything turns into paying a little
money out of the pocket, which makes it a slap on the wrist, then it
makes it more likely that they'll re-offend.”
Calls to a number listed for Proctor on a lawsuit he recently filed in
an attempt to be reinstated to the bench went unreturned at press time.
Check out the trailer for "Shelter," the Renaud Bros. new feature-length documentary about homeless teens navigating life on the streets of New Orleans with the help of Covenant House, the longstanding French Quarter shelter for homeless kids.
When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
Robocalls -- recorded messages sent to thousands of phone numbers -- are a fact of life in political campaigns. The public doesn't like them much, judging by the gripes about them, but campaign managers and politicians still believe in their utility.