The cutting-room floor 

D-G clips climate change.

You've probably pictured it in your head before. Perhaps it's a scene similar to the one in the film “Network” when television executive Arthur Jenson tells anchorman Howard “I'm-mad-as-hell” Beale, “You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and you will atone!” Perhaps it's the cliched old vision of a smoke-filled editorial office, several stories above the common people below, where overstuffed fat cats sit around a long mahogany table, puff cigars and decide what the great unwashed beast will read on the inside pages the next day. 

When we think of news gatekeepers it's easy to conjure up these types of images — the powerful making decisions for the herd. It's easy to think like this because, in general, people believe the “media” are biased against their point of view, whatever it might be. It's hard to prove bias actually exists without long-term, methodical research, but it is true that major media outlets, from the major networks to the “prestige papers” like the New York Times, and even on down to local papers like the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, do have a certain amount of influence. (Even though the Internet is helping to break up the monopoly major news outlets once enjoyed.)

The hope, though, is that a paper's editorial position on a certain subject doesn't bleed into hard-news content, that editors do not use their position of power to exert undue influence over the people who consume their product. But in practice, that's not always the case.

Take a Dec. 8 article from the front page of the Democrat-Gazette on the Environmental Protection Agency's ruling that greenhouse gases are harmful to public health and the environment. The text of the page-one story came from Associated Press reporters Dina Cappiello and Charles J. Hanley and the D-G's own Alison Sider. There's nothing new about a paper editng AP stories to fit the news hole. But what was peculiar about this particular account was how it differed from other AP stories on the web.

The first paragraph of the D-G story reads, “The EPA took a step toward regulating greenhouses [sic] gases, declaring on Monday that climate-changing pollution threatens the public health and the environment.”

Seems straightforward enough. However, an AP account found on Yahoo News says the EPA took that step by “concluding” climate change threatens public health.

This might not seem like a big change, but if you care about words and what they mean, it's a huge difference. One can declare something simply by saying it. A conclusion is drawn from a set of facts.

 There were other minor differences, but one paragraph stood out. The 10th paragraph of the Democrat-Gazette story reads, “The EPA signaled last April that it was inclined to view purportedly [italics mine] heat-trapping pollution as a threat to public health and welfare and began to take public comments for formal rulemaking.”

Notice two key differences from another AP account.

“The EPA signaled last April that it was inclined to view heat-trapping pollution as a threat to public health and welfare and began to take public comments under a formal rulemaking. The action marked a reversal from the Bush administration, which had refused before leaving office to issue the finding, despite a conclusion by EPA scientists that it was warranted.”

Again, small changes — one by commission, the other by omission — but it begs the question: Why? Why insert “purportedly,” when the vast majority of climatologists agree on the causes of climate change? Why eliminate a sentence that mentions the Bush administration's failure to act?

There's also a bigger question here of how far a local outlet can go in editing AP stories for publication. Paul Colford, director of media relations for AP, said he could not comment on any particular story, but in general, “an AP member has some latitude in presenting AP copy, barring any major difference from what moved on the wire.” 

Neither the D-G executive editor, Griffin Smith, nor deputy editor, Frank Fellone, could be reached for comment. 

Now, these are just a couple of small, yet telling, changes in what was a fairly long story. But it makes you wonder what else ends up on the cutting-room floor. 



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Most Shared

  • Koch mailer: We know who you are, we know if you vote

    Still more complaints rolling in — including from Republicans — about the mail campaign of the Koch-brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity to scare people into voting.
  • Pat Hays' NRA membership riles Republicans

    Democratic 2nd District Congress candidate Pat Hays is causing conniption fits among Republicans because a new TV ad shows him with his guns and mentions his long-time membership in the National Rifle Association.
  • Talk is cheap; state government isn't: Preparing for the new GOP order

    The state looks at rising prison and school costs in a world where the theme of Republican political campaigns is reducing government and cutting taxes. Does anybody in that party know arithmetic?
  • Live Review: Nahko and Medicine for the People at Rev Room

    Thursday night, Portland, Oregon’s Nahko and Medicine for the People brought their “musical medicine” to Little Rock’s Revolution Music Room, a fitting venue for the socially-conscious music collective. Their uplifting medley of folk, urban and world music, as well as hypnotizing videos featuring their music have enchanted activist-minded music fans across the world in the relatively short time they have been creating music together.
  • What about the Arkansas ballot issues?

    To give the legislature more power, the people less, a wetter state, longer term limits and a bump in the minimum wage.

Latest in Media

  • UA cozy with D-G columnist

    An interesting element of the ongoing story of budget problems in the University of Arkansas Advancement Division has been a divide in outlook in the pages of the state's dominant news medium, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
    • Nov 21, 2013
  • Democrat-Gazette covers one of its own in story of reporter Cathy Frye's rescue

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's reports on the rescue of its reporter Cathy Frye, who was missing for days in the hot scrubby desert that is Big Bend Ranch State Park, are gripping.
    • Oct 10, 2013
  • Hodge shares his OA vision

    Roger Hodge, the new editor of Oxford American magazine, talked about his rise at Harper's, his writing philosophy and his plans for the OA before a full crowd last Wednesday at the Clinton School.
    • Sep 26, 2012
  • More »

Event Calendar

« »


  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Mental health system in crisis in Arkansas

    The National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) has been sounding the alarm of a nationwide crisis in mental health services since 2011. On the other side of the Atlantic, the National Health Service in the United Kingdom is struggling to provide adequate mental health services. For us mental health professionals in Arkansas, these jeremiads ring a familiar bell.
  • Election decisions

    The Democratic Party candidates for top offices in Arkansas are centrists, with records of bipartisanship in public life. In each race, Republican opponents are from the extreme right end of the spectrum.
  • Romney's Obamacare

    Since it's too late in the election cycle for much else, can we engage in a historical what-if? Specifically, what if Mitt Romney had peaked in the spring of 2008 rather than 2012?
  • Naive cynicism

    Upon first venturing to write about politics 20 years ago, I held naive views about political journalism. Specifically, I imagined that factual accuracy mattered as it did in the kinds of books and magazine pieces I'd written on non-political topics — opinionated, yes, but grounded in careful reporting.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Election decisions

    • Especially Mike Ross and Mark Pryor. I don't necessarily agree with them on every issue…

    • on October 29, 2014
  • Re: Election decisions

    • Vote for the centrists, my friends.

    • on October 29, 2014
  • Re: Naive cynicism

    • I tried to read the Harper's article; couldn't finish. Tyson kickback? The tortuous, time-bending explication…

    • on October 29, 2014

© 2014 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation