Favorite

The war debate 

American voters have rarely had an appetite for much argument about foreign policy and war in presidential campaigns, but it is clearly different this year. People of every persuasion want those issues illuminated and they deserve a frank and full debate between President Bush and Senator Kerry. Alas, they are not apt to get it. Neither man has any zeal for a candid discussion of their doctrines of war and foreign affairs, Kerry owing to his own failure of will on the war resolution in Congress that gave Bush the signal to invade Iraq and Bush owing to the catastrophes that he has made both of the two wars that he has waged and of the international relationships that have been the backbone of American power for more than half a century. Kerry does the best he can with his limitations. He will never send men and women to die unless the country has no choice but to go to war, he says. War will always be a last resort, in contrast to George Bush's doctrine of pre-emptive war: We will go to war if we suspect a potential foe has the resources and will to threaten the United States. But the president is not going to articulate that policy in the campaign since his war against al Qaeda and Iraq have turned sour and the United States does not have the capacity any longer to wage a war against nations that clearly are threats, such as North Korea and Iran. So he is transforming himself into the peace president. He is, he said last week, rapidly bringing peace around the world. So entrapped is Kerry by his vote for the Iraq resolution that the Democratic Party platform could not state what Kerry and every major Democratic official, most Democratic voters and, we suspect, most Republicans, have long known, that the war was an epic mistake. Whenever Kerry makes a tepid criticism of the war - the president blundered in managing it - the Republicans razz him for flip-flopping, first favoring the war then criticizing it. They are wrong, of course. Kerry never favored the war. On the eve of the vote on the resolution in October 2002 he said he was voting for it in order to prevent war, not start it. He was voting to give Bush authority so that he could bring forces to bear to get the issues resolved without war and he called on Bush not go to war without full international backing and participation. But nuance is good for dissertations, not for political campaigns. Kerry would confide later that he really believed that Bush would allow U.N. inspections and assemble international support. Bush, you will remember, would later claim that he went to war because Saddam Hussein wouldn't let U.N. inspectors into the country - a blatant lie. It was Bush who ordered the inspectors to leave Iraq so that the bombing could begin. Bush said he would go to war only as "a last resort," but if Sen. Kerry really believed Bush would wait on inspections and for a reluctant international community to support him he was one of the few. Everything that has gone wrong in Iraq - the discovery that there were no weapons of mass destruction or even chemical, biological or nuclear programs, that there was no connection with al Qaeda and 9/11, the violence and unrest in postwar Iraq, an inflamed Arab world and dismayed allies - were all known and predicted before the invasion and even before the congressional vote. Secretary of State Colin Powell knew it. Here's what he said in February 2001 at Cairo about President Clinton's sanctions and military reprisals against Saddam: "Frankly, they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors." In other words, rotten as he was, Saddam was not even a threat to his neighbors any longer, much less to the United States. Powell was forced to change his story when the meager American force in Afghanistan let Osama bin Laden and other al Qaeda leaders escape and Bush looked for another enemy. On the eve of the congressional vote, a Knight-Ridder team wrote that intelligence experts and diplomats privately had misgivings about the war because the administration hawks had exaggerated evidence of Saddam's threats and that analysts were under pressure to produce reports supporting the administration's arguments that Iraq was a grave and imminent threat to the United States. The Washington Post, an editorial supporter of the war, carried the same news. The dramatic report of the 9/11 commission last month was old hat. Despite his limitations, here's all that Kerry needs to ask of Bush and the country. If Iraq were a desert tyranny with no oil, would the president have ordered the invasion? And if he had sent the forces to Afghanistan and Pakistan to eradicate bin Laden and al Qaeda, would there have been a war in Iraq? The answer to both is no, and the United States and the world would truly have been safer if Bush had done the first task competently.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ernest Dumas

  • Trumpeting

    When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
    • Jan 19, 2017
  • Glass houses

    Having gotten a deep security briefing and probably a confidential glimpse of our own vast cyberspying operation, Donald Trump is no longer pretty sure that the Kremlin didn't hack Democratic computers or employ other tactics to help his election.
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • ACA and the GOP

    Congress and the new president in a matter of weeks will repeal big parts of the Affordable Care Act, at least nominally, but what will follow that wondrous event will not be the contentment that Republicans have long promised, but even more political tumult.
    • Jan 5, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Religion as excuse upends Constitution

    Tirades over religious liberty since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriages nationwide have awakened the ghost of James Madison, the author of the constitutional doctrine on the matter, and it isn't happy that his effort to protect religious inquiry in America is being corrupted.
    • Jul 9, 2015
  • Guns, God and gays

    Many more mass shootings like the one last week in Roseburg, Ore., will stain the future and no law will pass that might reduce the carnage. That is not a prediction but a fact of life that is immune even to Hillary Clinton.
    • Oct 8, 2015
  • AEC dumps ALEC

    No matter which side of the battle over global warming you're on, that was blockbuster news last week. No, not the signing of the climate-change treaty that commits all of Earth's 195 nations to lowering their greenhouse-gas emissions and slowing the heating of the planet, but American Electric Power's announcement that it would no longer underwrite efforts to block renewable energy or federal smokestack controls in the United States.
    • Dec 17, 2015

Most Shared

  • Sarah Huckabee Sanders to be deputy White House press secretary

    Donald Trump announced additional White House staff today, notably including Sarah Huckabee Sanders, deputy assistant to the president and principal deputy press secretary.
  • Legislation filed for $10 million school voucher program

    The legislation to vastly expand transfer of state tax dollars to private schools came before the school choice day event I mentioned earlier.
  • Pork and more

    Some notes on disparate topics before I take a vacation break.
  • Trumpeting

    When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Latest in Ernest Dumas

  • Trumpeting

    When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
    • Jan 19, 2017
  • Glass houses

    Having gotten a deep security briefing and probably a confidential glimpse of our own vast cyberspying operation, Donald Trump is no longer pretty sure that the Kremlin didn't hack Democratic computers or employ other tactics to help his election.
    • Jan 12, 2017
  • ACA and the GOP

    Congress and the new president in a matter of weeks will repeal big parts of the Affordable Care Act, at least nominally, but what will follow that wondrous event will not be the contentment that Republicans have long promised, but even more political tumult.
    • Jan 5, 2017
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

Jack Pearadin and Doug Nelsen found a 1.73-carat diamond after nearly a year of searching the park's field.

Event Calendar

« »

January

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • Good one, Al. Hell hath no fury, and all that happy horse-shit. I hope Gene…

    • on January 20, 2017
  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • Make that "old hack."

    • on January 20, 2017
  • Re: Putin and Trump

    • Oh dear - It is me, E.E.W - I'll confess - but not so much…

    • on January 20, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation