When your lawyer is not the best 

Here's how to take action.

For some of our readers, this "Best Lawyers" edition may be arriving too late to be useful. However, there is a way to report bad legal representation, and it can result in penalties for the offending attorney. Official complaints are handled by the Arkansas Supreme Court's Office of Professional Conduct, and the process is simple. You do not have to retain legal counsel or have familiarity with the law to file a complaint, and anonymous submissions are accepted. The two-page form is available by visiting the Office of Professional Conduct in the Justice Building at 625 Marshall St., or by calling 376-0313. According to Stark Ligon, the executive director of the Office of Professional Conduct, every complaint is assigned to a staff attorney, who then does some preliminary investigation. "If we determine there is sufficient evidence of violations, we will prepare a formal complaint and serve it on the attorney in question," Ligon said. "Generally, this is the first notice the attorney has that a complaint has been filed." The accused attorney has an opportunity to respond and the accuser can respond in turn. The written case file is then brought before one of three standing panels for a review and a vote. Each panel consists of five lawyers and two non-lawyers, all appointed by the Supreme Court. "If the panel decides to sanction the attorney, an order is prepared and served on the attorney," Ligon explained. "He or she has the option to accept the sanction or request a public hearing from another panel." Ligon emphasized that the panel that conducts the public hearing would not know the action taken by the first panel, because all proceedings are kept confidential until a public hearing or a final order is entered into the record. Sanctioned attorneys can appeal to the Supreme Court as a last resort. Relatively few Arkansas lawyers are publicly punished, but the number of formal complaints filed by the Office of Professional Conduct has been increasing in recent years. Approximately 8,500 people have an Arkansas law license, but Ligon estimates that only 5,000 actually practice here. In 2003, his office received more than 1,000 written complaints, and exactly 200 merited formal charges, resulting in 121 disciplinary actions. This year, Ligon says that they are on track to file more than 200 complaints. A sanction may be as light as a warning or as serious as disbarment. However, all sanctions are publicly noted in the Arkansas Lawyer, a publication of the Arkansas Bar Association. You can also find complete disciplinary records of Arkansas attorneys at http://courts.state.ar.us/courts/cpc.html. The most common complaints involve attorneys who fail to discharge their duties, which most frequently means they have neglected their clients or caused inexcusable delays in court business. Following close behind are citations of attorneys who have been dishonest, deceitful, or fraudulent. Cases that result in a sanction are described in some detail by the Office of Professional Conduct. Mostly they involve attorneys who do not file papers on time or misrepresent the amount of work they have done. Occasionally, however, there are more interesting situations. For example, Fredye Mac Long of Texarkana was representing a woman in a 2003 divorce case when she became romantically involved with the lawyer who was representing the woman's husband, according to public records of the complaint. Long never told her client about the relationship, and subsequently filed a motion to withdraw the divorce. According to the sanction report, "the manner in which Ms. Long handled her motion to withdraw did not give [her client] reasonable notice so she could have had the chance to object to the motion, if she so desired." Long was cautioned, fined $1,000, and assessed costs of $50 for rules violations. She also ended up marrying the other attorney. Ligon cautions that his office rarely gets involved in fee disputes, because that is usually the domain of civil courts. The office also does not consider complaints against prosecutors for filing or not filing criminal charges. Voters are the usual recourse for complaints about charging decisions by prosecutors.. Only 20 percent of the written complaints received by Ligon's office result in a sanction against an attorney.

From the ArkTimes store


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Warwick Sabin

  • Helena's disappearing buildings

    Preservationists hope to slow demolitions.
    • Mar 22, 2007
  • Trailers headed to Dumas

    Gov. Mike Beebe issued the following statement earlier today: Although this decision by FEMA to deny emergency funds to Desha County defies common sense, Arkansas will take care of its own people.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • Youth Ranch robbed, vandalized

    According to a press release we just received: The Donald W. Reynolds Campus of the Arkansas Sheriff’s Youth Ranches (The Ranch) located near Fort Smith was vandalized overnight Thursday.  Items stolen during the break-in included all of the children’s saddles, food, tools and supplies from The Ranch’s carpentry shop and all equipment from its auto shop.  An investigation is underway with the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office.
    • Mar 9, 2007
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Executionpalooza

    Appearances count. I was struck by a single sentence over the weekend in a full page of coverage in The New York Times devoted to the killing spree in Arkansas, beginning with a front-page account of the recent flurry of legal filings on pending executions and continuing inside with an interview with Damien Echols, the former death row inmate.
  • Art bull

    "God, I hate art," my late friend The Doctor used to say.
  • Not justice

    The strongest, most enduring calls for the death penalty come from those who feel deeply the moral righteousness of "eye-for-an-eye" justice, or retribution. From the depths of pain and the heights of moral offense comes the cry, "The suffering you cause is the suffering you shall receive!" From the true moral insight that punishment should fit the crime, cool logic concludes, "Killers should be killed." Yet I say: retribution yes; death penalty no.
  • Judge Griffen writes about morality, Christian values and executions

    Pulaski County Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen, who blogs at Justice is a verb!, sends along a new post this morning.
  • The Ledell Lee execution thread

    Arkansas Times contributor Jacob Rosenberg is at the Cummins Unit in Grady filing dispatches tonight in advance of the expected execution of Ledell Lee, who was sentenced to death for the Feb. 9, 1993, murder of Debra Reese, 26, who was beaten to death in the bedroom of her home in Jacksonville.

Latest in Cover Stories

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Event Calendar

« »


2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Most Recent Comments


© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation