Favorite

Whither patriotism? 

Here's U.S. Rep. Marion Berry, D-Ark., arguing for an amendment he offered successfully last week with U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Ct., in the House Appropriations Committee to deny homeland security contracts to companies that relocate or domicile outside the country for tax advantages: "My U. S. citizenship is not for sale." Was that rhetoric entirely too easy or entirely fair? Seventeen Republican members of the committee must have thought it too easy, and voted no. Thirty-five members voted yes. No one offers any predictions whether such a provision would survive in the full House, the Senate, the inevitable and covert conference committee and amid the heavy interjecting hand of this corporate-wedded White House. Actually, the amendment pertained only to one award. Berry acknowledges that his and DeLauro's challenge is to keep attaching the wording every time it's relevant. This particular vote concerned the appropriation for a contract that went last week to Accenture, a Bermuda-based global holding company set up in 2001 for the worldwide activities of Andersen Consulting of Chicago. That was after the management consulting arm spun off from the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, which went on to die from the Enron scandal. The contract is for a potential $10 billion, making it conceivably one of the biggest contracts in federal government history. It was awarded by the border security division of the Homeland Security Department, which happens to be headed by Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas congressman. The contract is to apply the firm's biometrics technology, which even Berry applauds, to screen visitors at 400 air, land and sea ports to verify their country or origin and their compliance with immigration and visa policies. In the event it should hold up, the Berry-DeLauro amendment would strip Accenture from the contract or, presumably, force it to reorganize. This issue raises many questions: Is patriotism about more than the cliche of supporting the troops, but also about a corporation's responsibility to stay home even at the expense of its bottom line? Is tax responsibility different for corporations than individuals, since at the corporate level these tax-limiting manipulations can increase productivity and in turn allow the corporations to employ more people, including Americans, than they would otherwise? What if Accenture was able to develop this vital security technology that even Berry applauds in part because of the fiscal efficiencies it achieved by organizing off shore? Might we, then, be cutting off our nose to spite our face? We're getting into standard left-right, Democrat-Republican differences here, and the honest fact is that these questions are not as easy as the partisans and radio talkers and cable commentators would have you believe. But having asked tough questions, I am obliged to offer one man's answers. Here they are: This country's great social, cultural, political and economic failing of the moment - it's great patriotic failing - is that no one other than mostly lower middle-class military enlistees and their families are being called upon to sacrifice in this great war against terrorism. We cut taxes while we spend more. Our president asks us only to be brave enough to keep up our retail shopping even if the terror color changes. Our corporations need not stay home to reap their own terrorism profits. America is a country of great corporations; those corporations are consummately American. As such, they should make sacrifices as well. The least sacrifice they could make would be to incorporate at home and pay all their domestic taxes in exchange for raiding those very taxes. They might find enough ingenuity to manage even with the higher tax bill to develop the new gadgetry that will make their country safer, freer and richer. Here's hoping Marion Berry keep spouting that rhetoric.
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by John Brummett

  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • Can we talk? Can we get anywhere?

    Dialogue is good. It would be even better if someone would venture off script every once in a while.
    • Sep 21, 2011
  • More »

Most Shared

  • Sarah Huckabee Sanders to be deputy White House press secretary

    Donald Trump announced additional White House staff today, notably including Sarah Huckabee Sanders, deputy assistant to the president and principal deputy press secretary.
  • Legislation filed for $10 million school voucher program

    The legislation to vastly expand transfer of state tax dollars to private schools came before the school choice day event I mentioned earlier.
  • Pork and more

    Some notes on disparate topics before I take a vacation break.
  • Trumpeting

    When President-elect Trump announced he would, in a few days, force Congress to enact comprehensive health insurance for everyone, poor or rich, that would provide better and cheaper care than they've ever gotten, you had to wonder whether this guy is a miracle worker or a fool.
  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Latest in John Brummett

  • Gone to the DoG

    We're now longer carrying John Brummett's column in this space.
    • Oct 12, 2011
  • Obstruction is the preferred conservatism

    Is there greater conservative virtue in opposing federal health reform, period, or in saying it ought to be implemented locally instead of from Washington in the event we are unavoidably laden with it?
    • Oct 5, 2011
  • A fate not quite as bad as prison for Lu Hardin

    There is no crime in being overly and transparently solicitous for the purposes of aggrandizement and personal political advancement. That's simply acute neediness, a common and benign human frailty.
    • Sep 28, 2011
  • More »

Visit Arkansas

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

1.73-carat diamond found at Crater of Diamonds State Park

Jack Pearadin and Doug Nelsen found a 1.73-carat diamond after nearly a year of searching the park's field.

Event Calendar

« »

January

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31  

Most Viewed

  • A heart in this house

    Since Election Day, I have been at a loss as to how to direct my energy. I am spinning in circles.
  • Putin and Trump

    Here's a thought exercise: What do you suppose would happen if Russian strongman Vladimir Putin decided to clarify remarks he reportedly made about Donald Trump during the election campaign?

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: A heart in this house

    • Arkansas needs You.

    • on January 19, 2017
  • Re: A heart in this house

    • Autumn Tolbert, thank You. I met Rev. Barbour in Selma two years ago. A new…

    • on January 19, 2017
  • Re: Hillbillies

    • And still you never answer on the specifics I have raised - how am I…

    • on January 19, 2017
 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation