Legislators get theirs
Legislation was filed yesterday to increase legislators' expense allowance by 50 PER CENT and to increase the number of people who get enhanced payments for special duties.
The argument is that there's been no increase in the allowance since 1997 and this merely reflects the cumulative effect of inflation.
This alibi would carry a bit more weight if the expense allowance were not a simple salary supplement. Indeed, you could always submit itemized statements for actual expenses up to the limit. Bottom line: legislators will get almost $5,000 more per year, going from $9,600 to $14,400 in the expense allowance, retroactive to the start of the session. This is on top of almost $600 in pay raises over the next two years, pushing salaries to near $15,000. And it doesn't include per diem payments for days at the Capitol (this payment is also getting bumped up for close-in lawmakers). When your legislator is madly patting himself on the back for his work on education this session, ask him/her if the teachers in his district are getting $5,400 in raises and if all of them make the $40,000 or so annually that legislators generally pull down in accumulated payments for their part-time work. (This sounds like a project for Jay Greene, to compute the hourly wage of a legislator, not forgetting to include the value of all those free meals and drinks.)
UPDATE: More fun with arithmetic. I took a look at pay records of employees in the general pay plan. An employee receiving the standard pay increase from the legislature every year has seen a 31 percent increase in pay, comparing 1997 wages with 2006 wages. That's a good bit less than 50 percent, seems like. Exactly what escalator did lawmakers use in devising this huge increase? And wages are taxable, where the expense allowances, I believe, are not.







Comments
Well...since they're really concerned about things that haven't been increased in a while, I'll be expecting them to oppose the new bill that takes back the tip credit increase passed last year when the min wage increased. Those workers hadn't received a raise in 9 years...
While we're at it, they'll probably want to increase the severance tax on natural gas ...you know, because it's been a few years on that one too (1957).
Posted by: Biscoe Jackson
|
March 1, 2007 09:03 AM
We could make legislators work for tips instead of a salary. Oh, wait, all those campaign contributions are "tips" apparently for "good service" to certain special interests. We need to all get our own PACs so we can "tip" accordingly looks like.
Posted by: Rackensacker
|
March 1, 2007 10:50 AM
You all beat me to it! I was going to suggest our Ledge work for $2.62 per hour plus tips. Getting good service and decent laws out of our Ledge is far more important than if my steak gets to the table in a hurry. Let the Ledge work for tips!
If I didn't dread it when the Ledge is actually in session, I'd be asking why bother at all if the business of our state is so unimportant that it only requires attention every other year? I still say Bill Gates or Steve Jobs can invent some computer program that would replace the Ledge and bring Arkansas into the 21st century.
Posted by: Deathbyinches
|
March 1, 2007 11:10 AM
Two dollars and change sounds about right to me. What'd be even better is if we could somehow tie their salaries to how satisfied the majority of their constituents were with their legislative work. But even then, our tax-funded salaries would pale in comparison to the perks made off the books from their lobbying buds.
I'll admit, however, that if hubby's raises were determined by us...we'd be upping that salary as much as the market could bear.
Posted by: zelda
|
March 1, 2007 12:52 PM