1,300 chickens in every barrel
Running trucks on fat? That's what Tyson Foods and ConocoPhillips have in mind, the Wall Street Journal reports today. Tyson will ship beef, pork and chicken fat from a plant in Texas to a Conoco refinery to make the diesel fuel in a process the WSJ said "more resembles winemaking than oil refining." The EPA will have to approve the fat diesel.
Tyson produces about 300 million gallons of beef, pork and chicken fat each year. About 58% of its fat production will go to the diesel deal once it is ramped up. Currently Tyson sells its fat for use in such products as cosmetics, soap and pet food. Producing one 42-gallon barrel of renewable diesel requires about one barrel of animal fat. And each barrel requires, on average, two steers, or 16 hogs or 1,300 chickens, Tyson officials say.



Comments
I think you misquoted the WSJ article. It compares the production of biodiesel to winemaking while the "renewable" diesel made from animal fat is said to be similar to conventional diesel production.
EDITOR'S NOTE: Right you are. Aren't you glad I posted the article?
Posted by: Well
|
April 16, 2007 12:51 PM
Isn't renewable energy great. Tasty grub as a byproduct of energy production. We can start breeding animals that have a higher fat content to produce a more efficient source of fuel.
Guess the environmentalists will have to refine their messaging to mean renewable plant based energy.
Posted by: Stump
|
April 16, 2007 02:16 PM
I support all renewable fuels, id fill my vehicle full of politicians piss if it would power it and help keep the environment clean as well as money away from Exxon Mobile!
Posted by: J Corby Dieu
|
April 16, 2007 02:44 PM
>id fill my vehicle full of politicians piss<
First you would need to make a contribution to their pac.
I have no idea why surplus animal fat has not been used to generate electricity using a Stirling engine?
For a relatively small investment Tyson or other meat producers could be cranking out 10,000 kw daily.
Posted by: Lwood
|
April 16, 2007 03:39 PM
"two steers, or 16 hogs"
I'd have thought that hogs would be more equivalent to cows in fat content. They must not be using Arkansas' hogs.
Posted by: Spirit
|
April 16, 2007 04:00 PM
"two steers, or 16 hogs"
They must not be using Arkansas' hogs.<
Steers are mucho larger than they once were. In the 80s a lean steer would bring a premium, now fat ones do as consumer tastes have shifted to more fat.
_
Posted by: Lwood
|
April 16, 2007 04:53 PM
And now...the rest of the story. Conoco is using a process called thermal depolymerization. It mimics Mother Nature; the organic waste is converted via high pressure and heat to crude oil, just like the natural process. I haven't figured whether fat is integral to it, as it is to biodiesel production. I think not; you just need something hydrogen and carbon based to turn into short chain hydrocarbons. Fat is what's available in abundance as a waste product. Biodiesel is produced via transesterification, a chemical process in which an oil, alcohol and an enzyme produce an ester (biodiesel from soyoil is "soy methyl ester") and a small amount of glycerine. The National Biodiesel Board is unhappy about all this; the Treasury Department was just "persuaded" a couple of weeks ago to make TDP derived diesel eligible for the $1/gallon biodiesel tax break. They say Conoco is not going to produce any more fuel using this method, and it therefore does not achieve the subsidy's goal. Another fun fact--Conoco just gave $22.5 million to Iowa State to research biofuels. Ruth Harkin, who is Senate Ag Cmte. Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA)'s wife, had a lot to do with it; she sits on both the ISU Board of Regents and the Conoco Phillips board.
Posted by: gjdodger
|
April 16, 2007 09:54 PM