The slimeball is back
You will be shocked to learn, I'm sure, that Special Persecutor Kenneth Starr leaked to Jeff Gerth and Donald Van Natta for their hit job on Hillary Clinton. You will be equally shocked to know that it's innuendo-laden slime, not facts, and that Gerth and Van Natta are happily peddling it.







Comments
After all these years, I'd still like to firmly plant my boot right up Ken Starr's smelly ass.
Posted by: durangokid
|
May 31, 2007 09:51 AM
The alumni of Pepperdine should be ashamed that Starr has a job at the law school. Would the people of Arkansas put up with Starr at the U of A law school? How about if Paul Wolfowitz joins the staff in Fayetteville, he's looking for a new job.
I say starve the bastards out! Let them bag groceries for a few years at minimum wage, that should fix their little red wagons!
I heard a rumor years ago that Hillary and Vince Foster had a long running affair that was forced to an end when everyone packed up and moved to DC in 92. So what? It appears 60 to 70% of married adults have a little fidelity problem(s) in their lifetime.
It wouldn't make me think less or more of Hillary if it were true. We've spent the last 100 years looking for Jesus in our political candidates....isn't that pretty stupid? Who'd want to live in a country governed by a pack of Monica Goodlings? Snot me!
No matter, I don't read Gerth for the same reasons I don't read Kitty Kelly books....all trash...all about as truthful as Tom DeLay. I won't waste my beautiful mind on such stuff.
Ken Starr cost taxpayers over 48 million dollars, that's over 4 hours worth of waging war in Iraq today. Nothing Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton or Vince Foster ever did cost more or was more damaging or was a bigger waste of time.
Ken Starr should be hounded so badly on a daily basis that he's a prisoner in his own house. We should present him with a bill!
Pepperdine should be shuttered. Starr should join Paul Wolfowitz and Tim Griffin in the unemployment lines. If they all froze to death in a hobo camp this winter, it's better than they deserve.
Ohhhh...shoulda skipped that 3rd cup of coffee this morning!
Posted by: Deathbyinches
|
May 31, 2007 11:01 AM
I'm curious Max. How are you able to determine what is a fact here?
If you know it all, why haven't you written your own book telling us how it is?
ARK. BLOG: Don't you think that it is the responsibility of those spreading the innuendo to offer some justification for unsupported assertions by the scuzzball that he had the goods on Hillary? The notion that Ken Starr held back on anybody or anything is unsupported by the evidence of his years-long witch hunt that came up empty-handed as to the Clintons, save the Monica gift.
Posted by: Arkansas Red
|
May 31, 2007 11:04 AM
Well, I'm sure if anything in the book was libelous, Sen. Rodham Clinton would avail herself of any legal remedies she can determine.
Until then, I look forward to partaking of the crackling yarn which hits shelves on June 8th!
Posted by: Arkansas Red
|
May 31, 2007 12:35 PM
I'm sure if anything in the book was libelous, Sen. Rodham Clinton would avail herself of any legal remedies she can determine.""
You certainly have web site that attracts many political morons as evidenced by the quote above.
Perhaps Max Brantley will explain that public figures have different standard to meet regarding libel suits.
ARK. BLOG: There's that. But also, we already know what the book says on this subject. Nothing but innuendo. Slimy.
Posted by: Knoc Knock
|
May 31, 2007 12:54 PM
No doubt Red is saving a spot on his shelf for The Swiftboat Anthology and 10 part DVD set of their finest moments.
He's a card carrying member of the National Enquirer Enquiring Minds Club. He'll believe anything. Hey...how's that Enzyte working out?
Posted by: Deathbyinches
|
May 31, 2007 01:01 PM
Don't need the Enzyte, but I am concerned over your obsession with my package.
Sadly, I do not belong to the National Enquirer club. My dues go to the VRWC.
And yes, you are right that public figures have a different standard. Slimy may not reach the level of "actual malice," but I offer that Max's characterization of "innuendo" is framed by his own opinions and unsupported in their own right.
Posted by: Arkansas Red
|
May 31, 2007 04:03 PM
Oh Hell. I just got around to checking the source. NEWSDAY ! Isn't Pepperdine and Newday funded by the same sleazeball? Is he not one of the original neocons who helped dream up a 1000 Year Republican Reich??
Didn' this derranged person finance the Clinton Witch hunt?
Posted by: Knoc Knock
|
May 31, 2007 04:08 PM
Arkansas Red wrote:
-but I offer that Max's characterization of "innuendo" is framed by his own opinions and unsupported in their own right.-
Oh yea? Try this :
"Two independent counsels investigated this and completely cleared both Clintons," said Lanny Davis, who led White House damage control during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. "For Ken Starr to talk to reporters after announcing he cleared them [the Clintons], with the innuendo that he could have done something else, is a reckless abuse of prosecutorial power."
Newsday
Posted by: Knoc Knock
|
May 31, 2007 04:13 PM
Because Lanny Davis' characterizations hold so much water.
Posted by: Arkansas Red
|
May 31, 2007 04:25 PM
Arkansas Red: "Because Lanny Davis' characterizations hold so much water."
Gee, does that mean they're kinda like Georgieboy's pronouncements?
Posted by: Doigotta
|
June 1, 2007 10:37 AM