Arkansas Blog

Well, hunkie dunkie. Who is Selena Walters backing on the other side of the aisle?

The Democrat-Gazette reported this last week.

Juanita Broaddrick must be the least favorite subject among Clinton supporters. Her allegations remain highly credible today.

Several years ago, I asked a Clinton supporter in her town whether he believed Broaddrick's claims were true, and he said yes. So I asked him how he could continue to support a rapist. His response was - verbatim - "She deserved to be raped." That response provided a lot of insight into the thinking of Clinton's most loyal supporters.

Sure, here we go, make the victim the perp.

In his personal life Bill, was, and probably (since the arrival of levitra) still is, a disgusting slim ball.

good to great politician.

Only difference between bill and the repubs is Bill gets by with rape, ect.

but no comment on Selena Walters being crdible? Hypocrisy reigns supreme, even on Arktimes Blog. Hurrah.....

Forgive my ignorance, Cato....I don't believe I know Ms. Walters. Who knows what happened between Ms Broaddrick and Bill Clinton?

It was a party period of time...I don't remember half of what I did back then. If Ms Broaddrick's proof wasn't good enough to get Clinton arrested way back then.....it must not be very good evidence. There are plenty of Republican judges that would love lock up Bill Clinton.

All I remember about her from back then is that she was a fine looking woman who liked to party and made the party circuit. Does that make her loose? No...but it probably made me wish she was loose.

Sex isn't our current problem. Even Vitter is not important....just disgusting. We have a team of criminals stealing our government and people are dying in droves in Iraq while we steal the oil. America TORTURES, so who really cares if women get raped?* Countries that TORTURE treat woman like cattle....now we're just another one.

*OK...even if we're sliding into the crapper I care if women are raped. But to a country that tortures...what's a little rape?

If the victim had reported the rape immediately, there was sufficient evidence to prosecute and convict Attorney General Bill Clinton. Unfortunately, she didn't report the incident before the statue of limitations precluded it.

Then she loses and Clinton, if guilty...wins. End of story.

Bottom line: Clinton was never convicted of raping anyone. And given his history, I doubt he raped Broaddrick. Sure he's a whore dog who'll screw most anything that crosses his path...but that's a long way from being a rapist. But I guess the Republicans never let a court/jury get in the way of their predetermined opinions. As a fair liberal, however, I would never accuse Laura Bush of murdering someone with her car or say her husband was a liver-lilied, chicken shit lying coward who was snorting cocaine/screwing around while hiding from Vietnam....or that his Texas driving record vanished into thin air 'cause his law breaking would've kept him from the presidency. I would simply say that there are rumors to that affect.

"Forgive my ignorance, Cato....I don't believe I know Ms. Walters."

That's a major point, DBI. Most don't. Now the next obvious question is why not? Why didn't Americans get a big dose of Selene Walters, the actress who accused Ronald Reagan of rape? I

It didn't get play back then by the left-wing liberal press, of course, The media ridiculed these charges and others that the Reagans smoke pot with Jack Benny and George Burns and Frank Sinatra. But Walters' sounds remarkably like Juanita Broaddrick's story.

Walters, like Broaddrick, didn't file charges. Fred Barnes said, "This is National Inquirer journalism. It's the kind where you look for everything, you vacuum up everything that's unfavorable, use all of it, whether it's rumor, fact, innuendo, hearsay, use all it, and don't let a kind word get in the whole thing."

Barnes, of course, had a different attitude with the Broaddrick/Clinton news. Barnes wrote, "The accused [Clinton] is now the president of the United States..Will he get away with what no other American could get away with - not having to answer the accusation directly?"

Barnes had a different yardstick to measure Clinton than the did with Reagan.

Thanks for the info, cato. Either I'd forgotten about Walters or never knew the story. (sigh, age and the mind). I honestly wonder how someone like Barnes (and he's one of MANY) can keep a straight face while practicing their blatant hypocrisy. I couldn't.

Speaking of hypocritical Repulicans...I watched O'Reilly and Laura Ingraham ask and explain to each other why they shouldn't feel bad about being war enablers...about being wrong on every aspect of the war...about NOT being more questioning of government (not Bush, ha) in the lead-up to the war...well, they worked it all out between em and they really were right about being so wrong.

Then there's G.W.Bush's affair with the black woman in Houston who claims an illegitimate child with him. Her outcome: death by shooting.

Btw she filed a lawsuit on the incident.

Now tell me about the liberal bias in Am media.
_

If anyone has evidence against Reagan, bring it on. It should be documented and investigated for the sake of history, even though he is deceased and unable to refute the allegation.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is running for president right now. The credible allegation of violent rape committed by her husband should be an issue in this campaign. Bill Clinton is alive and fully capable of personally answering the questions, and releasing his schedule for the date in question - April 25, 1978.

There is no 'credible' allegation of rape against Clinton. Neither is there credible evidence he robbed a bank or streaked nude through Central Park.

Zelda - the allegation is credible for several reasons. First, Ms. Broaddrick is a successful businesswoman and a respected member of the community. She is a credible person. She has no history of misconduct. There is nothing to show that her allegation was motivated by politics or money. Her account has been corroborated by contemporaneous accounts given to her friends. Her description of the scene is accurate. Photographs of her and Clinton together exist from previous meetings where she was a volunteer for his political campaign.

Then there is Bill Clinton - a proven liar and philanderer who enjoys masturbating into the Oval Office sink while a young intern sticks her tongue up his butthole. His history of lies and deranged behavior certainly makes him a plausible rapist.

Our prisons are filled with rapists who were convicted with less evidence than Ms. Broaddrick's allegations.

The Strange Death of the Woman Who Filed a Rape Lawsuit Against Bush

By Jackson Thoreau

"Early one Saturday afternoon in July 2003, I made a simple phone call to Margie Schoedinger, a Texas woman who filed a rape lawsuit against George W. Bush in December 2002. I expected to leave a message on a machine, so I was caught a little offguard when Schoedinger answered.

She, too, sounded somewhat surprised I had called, saying she hadn't heard from many other reporters. But she talked to me for a few minutes about the legal action.

"I am still trying to prosecute [the lawsuit]," said Schoedinger, a 38-year-old African-American woman who lived in the Houston suburb of Missouri City. "I want to get this matter settled and go on with my life."

What a fount of information Arkansas Blogger is. Where in the sacred name of Ken Starr did you come up with such information about Clinton's sex life?

If true, I'd like to compliment President Clinton for being considerate enough to ejaculate in the sink. You can bet the farm Pretend President Bush would splatter all over the Presidential Seal rug in the Oval Office because that's the kind of a pig he is. Not a manner in his polyp ridden body.

However, I've spent far too much time on the perverted fantasies of your imagination. Bill Clinton is Jesus H. Christ walking when compared to George W. Bush.

Our troubles are only beginning as we exit Springtime for Bush in America. If we don't act fast....only the Rapture will save us.

I'm actually looking forward to a world with all the Christians gone. Maybe then we'll see a little peace.

God almighty Arkansas Blogger...where in the hell did you drag up that sink crap? Never mind, it's bullshit and an example of what's wrong with the Republican Party. The Repubs have no respect for our judicial system. For some delusional reason, y'all seem to think that your world view trumps 200 plus years of governing by a pretty good system of checks/balances. Aside from being hypocrites who dismiss jury verdicts 'just because' (Libby), y'all think it's okay to accuse Clinton of every sexual sin under the sun; and then argue those 'accusations' like they're a matter of public record...a matter of 'fact.' Never mind that he was NEVER charged with the Brodderick crap or with any version of your sink fairy tale...and never mind ALL the numerous sins allegedly committed by Reagan/Bush I&2 and conveniently ignored by the loyal flock.

You and your party have no credibility and are not worthy enough to kiss Clinton's screwing ass.

Hi Zelda - the information I provided about Clinton's conduct in the Oval Office of the White House was based on Lewinsky's testimony to the grand jury, and documented in the Independent Counsel's Report. The Library of Congress has that part of the report here -

http://thomas.loc.gov/icreport/6narrit.htm

See footnote #209. You really have to pay close attention to the footnotes in the report to understand what happened.

Personally, I don't think the Oval Office is an appropriate place for oral-anal sex, and it shows an appalling lack of judgement by Bill Clinton. Just my opinion, you may disagree.

The IC Report never mentioned Juanita Broaddrick by name, she was only referred to as "Jane Doe #5". But the report did contain enough clues for independent researchers to figure out what happened in 1978, especially when the IC Report footnotes are matched up with the legal filings in the sexual harassment lawsuit that was filed against Bill Clinton. I'm sure that Hillary really appreciated having to liquidate her blind trust in order to pay Paula Jones for the lawsuit settlement.

If Hillary wins the nomination, her husband will be a big issue. We'll be hearing about the Clinton rapes and rimjobs all over again. And there are plenty of other scandals to be revealed.

My Gawd!!! BushZo, the clown has run amuch and you want to talk about Bill and his sex fetish.

never mind this..."Executive Order:
Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq
I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004."

click blue 'bejeeus' for LINK

I disagree Arkansas Blogger.

I don't think anyone gives a shit anymore.

oops
run amuch = run amuck

I'd much rather have the Oval Office used for hide the sausage fun and games than the waging of eternal war. I'd rather find semen in the sink than the blood of 3645 dead US soldiers.

Lew nailed it....if 24 rest home running women come forth with naked pictures of Clinton spiking their hineys how on earth does that compare with the neo-con takeover of our government, the stealing of Iraq's oil and the torture and murder of hundreds of thousands of people. Worrying about sex is what you do when times are good.

The death of America is before us, we're circling the drain..semen or no seman.

Hi Arkansas...maybe my reading skills aren't what they use to be (or should be) but I missed the tongue/butt testimony (within your link). I'll take your word for it, nonetheless, if you say that was Monica's actual testimony...mainly because it doesn't matter one whit. We started this discussion 'cause of your unfounded rape accusations; and because I find the rape allegation to be especially offensive and blatantly hypocritical. There's more than one reason that we allow the judicial system to determine guilt/innocence (EVERYBODY knows something about somebody, and has a personal opinion about guilt/innocence). But it seems that the Republicans want to have their very own judicial system...one where Clinton is guilty of rape and Libby is innocent. Aside from the gall...it's a recipe for chaos.

For those of you who are insisting that there is a linkage between the Broaddrick rape scandal and our mission in Iraq, please consider this: If Bill Clinton had not done what he did, Al Gore would be president today. The Broaddrick matter got the Articles of Impeachment passed, which in turn lost the election for Gore.

We can only speculate whether Gore would have taken military action against Saddam as President Bush has, but I believe that our military intervention in Iraq was inevitable.

It's also quite possible that if Bill Clinton had not passed up numerous opportunities to take out Osama bin Laden, the 9/11 attacks wouldn't have occurred in the first place. But he was too busy jacking off in the Oval Office with his intern to do anything about bin Laden.

Have a nice weekend. Namaste and Peace Out.

"For those of you who are insisting that there is a linkage between the Broaddrick rape scandal and our mission in Iraq, please consider this: If Bill Clinton had not done what he did, Al Gore would be president today. The Broaddrick matter got the Articles of Impeachment passed, which in turn lost the election for Gore.

We can only speculate whether Gore would have taken military action against Saddam as President Bush has, but I believe that our military intervention in Iraq was inevitable.

It's also quite possible that if Bill Clinton had not passed up numerous opportunities to take out Osama bin Laden, the 9/11 attacks wouldn't have occurred in the first place. But he was too busy jacking off in the Oval Office with his intern to do anything about bin Laden."
by: Arkansas Blogger

That's so stupid it doesn't deserve a response!