Compassionate conservatism -- UPDATE
Here's an issue ready-made for Mike Huckabee. He could blast President Bush for standing in the way of state expansion of the child health insurance program. Arkansas has been a pioneer in this effort and wants to make the coverage available to children of families with income above the poverty level. That won't do for Bush. Either you can afford to pay a private company for insurance or you just don't deserve it.
UPDATE: Gene Sperling, who was an adviser to Bill Clinton, chews Bush up on this story (curiously lacking from D-G though it has prominent play just about everywhere else and has a direct Arkansas connection.)
What is most inexcusable about the White House stance is what they don't say. They offer nothing -- no better idea, no alternative, no plan -- that has been shown to keep even a chunk of these 5 million to 6 million children from going to sleep every night without health insurance.
They are content to keep the status quo even with heartbreaking reports that uninsured infants with congenital heart problems are 10 times more likely to die because of delayed treatment than those with coverage.
Before, "compassionate conservatism" may have seemed like a political bumper sticker. Now it seems like the punch line of a sad joke, at the expense of millions of impoverished children.



Comments
Compassionate conservatism.
Recall what Ghandi said when he was asked his view of Western Civilization?
"I think it's a good idea"
.
Posted by: Lwood
|
August 21, 2007 07:28 AM
Bush and company are idiots, no doubt. And vicious ones at that.
How about a combined salary of $45,000 for a "middle class" Arkansas family? Good money, huh?
Uh huh.
Now factor in a car payment ot two, three buck a gallon gas (whaddaya wanna bet it's headed there again?), child care, suitable work clothes, housing, food, utilities -- and on and on the list goes.
Our esteemed president wants to be sure that insurance companies don't lose any premiums.
So consider the situation of a young couple I know: one child, two jobs -- thankfully both with paid insurance for mom and dad. But the premiums on the policy with the cheapest "family" coverage is more than $700, nearly twice the individual employee premium. That's $700 a month for one small, healthy, non-accident prone (yet) child. Almost $9,000 a year -- twenty per cent of this family's gross (GROSS!) income. This makes sense?
So the family should buy cheaper, private insurance for the kiddie? Right. Take a gander sometime at the loopholes insurance companies write into their individual policies.
Can we indict the SOB, er, president, for stupidity? Or maybe we are the stupid ones?
Posted by: Doigotta
|
August 21, 2007 11:52 AM
"Compassonate conservative." A conservative is someone who has it made and aims to keep it. A compassionate conservative would be someone who may help you out a little, if he thinks you deserve it, if you don't claim any rights about it, if you work hard and cheap for his benefit, and if you are appropriately grateful. Think a plantation owner (planter) who "takes care of his Nigras." It is no coincidence that the South has risen again as solidly Republican.
Posted by: Snapback
|
August 21, 2007 12:31 PM
It's certainly an expansion to call people up 25 "children and to include families with incomes up to $80,000.
What happened to y'all complaining about the deficit?
Posted by: Anonymous
|
August 21, 2007 01:21 PM
Face it boys......Cheney-Bush has spent all the money on war to steal some oil. They don't have the bucks to help out sick kids. If I blow all my money on coke and not the liquid kind.....my sick kids would have to do without a visit to the doctor too. It's not their lack of compassion, it's their insanity of spending all the money on war.
Oh...and all that money belongs to you, me and China......so there is a bill paying day down the road for all of us. It won't be long before they tell the old folks to just die, because all the SS money went for bombs too. There will come a day when we are forced to eat the rich. Let us remember the Republicans killed America, not meth-heads, not chicken gutting Mexicans, not dog fighting black guys, not gays, not Paris Hilton, not terrorists.....it was old lumpy white Republicans that did us in. Tsk tsk
Posted by: Deathbyinches
|
August 21, 2007 04:35 PM
So, with the repubs it's like this:
On one hand, you have the corporations wanting to suck as much money as possible out of the middle class and poor,
On the other hand you have children suffering and dying for lack of health care.
Notice what side they are on? It tells the tale.
Posted by: rablib
|
August 22, 2007 09:37 PM