Arkansas Times

Arkansas Blog

« It must be the heat | Main | Double punishment -- UPDATE »

Riverdale traffic

I've done a quick breeze through four discs of info from Metroplan on the ongoing Riverdale traffic study, a project done in conjunction with the state and city of Little Rock. It all is part of a first-phase study of population, development, traffic volume, and congestion in the area. A second phase would be a study of solutions for any problems identified. A third phase would be doing the work.

I note with interest that a first draft of the study, which is to be final in a couple of weeks, referenced overloaded streets. A city traffic planner suggested that that phrase not be used because the data didn't support that conclusion, at least not yet.

Indeed, Some quick notes on my reading: Traffic along Cantrell in the Riverdale area is not nearly so congested as, for example, Cantrell in the Heights, Tanglewood and beyond. Most key intersections operate at acceptable efficiency, with the exception of turn lanes here and there during morning and evening rush hours. Traffic is up historically through the Riverdale region, but not by extraordinary amounts. Traffic accidents have actually declined in recent years and, over a 10-year span, pedestrian and bike accidents also have declined. Others undoubtedly will disagree, but I find in the report some support for my view that traffic isn't as bad as described, with some peak hour exceptions.

The study is looking at traffic in "cut-through" neighborhoods, such as Hillcrest, an escape route to I-630 from Riverdale, and Overlook-Kingwood-etc., an escape route at the western end of Rebsamen Park Road to Highway 10.

Turn lane and signal improvements clearly aren't adequate, despite some recent work, on Cantrell at Cedar Hill and Riverfront Drive. But I hope the notion of putting more traffic on steep, narrow and windy Cedar Hill; of trying to make it easier to move traffic on the Cedar corridor through pedestrian- and neighborhood-traffic-friendly Hillcrest, and of making "improvements" at the western end of Rebsamen Park, whether on a cut-through uphill to Cantrell or, worse, an extension of the road over Jimerson Creek, remain off-limits. Other areas of the city (see University Avenue) need help more and stable neighborhoods don't need to be degraded to help commuters get home to Bryant quicker.

Eternal vigilance .... Thus my interest in reviewing the work. More as it comes along. Thanks to Jim McKenzie at Metroplan for providing the work so far.

Comments

Thanks for the vigilance; please keep us posted.

I'd hope the fact that the Riverdale area is already considered congested during rush hour would be enough to discourage planners from sending more traffic to the area. You are right on about other areas needing road work more! Especially after the recent vote on increasing the Mayor's powers; people will be watching to see if Little Rock's government takes care of the infrastructure needs of the poorer areas of the city.

I agree with the assessment that traffic on Cantrell is not nearly as congested as we are led to believe. In fact, its not all that bad for a collector blvd through neighborhoods traffic lights and all.

Last Spring, Monday May 7th, a commuter challenge was held between Mayor Stodola driving a car from the intersection of Mississippi and Cantrell and cyclist Donnie Van Patter from the base of the BDB. The challenge was to see who would get to downtown LR first. (There was also one held on the NLR side with Mayor Hayes driving and Eric Gustafson cycling, but the subject here is on the traffic on Cantrell during AM rush) The Mayor would drive on Cantrell following the speed limit. Donnie would predicatably use the trails as designated and obey all traffic laws as well.

Initial plans for the event called for the challenge to start at 7 AM. Those familiar with a drive know there is no traffic to speak of on Cantrell at that time. 7:15 AM? Nope, still not enough to slow the car down. OK, 7:20 AM? No. 7:30 AM. That should be late enough and that's when it started. Nope, still not late enough.

As it was, the Mayor reported that even by following the 35 mph speed limit he was being passed all the time by cars going 10 - 20 mph faster. He arrived in LR just 2 minutes ahead of the cyclist. The finish time would have been closer had the cyclist not been delayed by traffic lights on W Markham.

As reported by several people trying to make it to the finish line, the traffic on Cantrell really picked up and became congested around 7:45 AM

What this tells me is:
1) Traffic on Cantrell is not congested in the AM unless you wait to leave at the last minute like a large number of motorists seem to do given an 8AM show time at work.
2) Motorists, once reaching LaHarpe, have an even easier time getting into LR than someone trying to use W Markham

Observations. UALR cited human engineering as one of the solutions to traffic congestion in their study over a year ago. We see that with every one leaving home so close to 8 AM, converging at the same time on the downtown area and worried about being late that frustrations evolve. If motorists would leave home sooner then this would be resolved in part.

Likewise, departure times from work can be engineered to the same affect. If everyone leaves at once, it will be congested. As motorist's spread out further away from the city center the flow picks up.

Or, motorists can elect to occasionally use another way to get to work other than a car. A way that fewer people use, is less congested or not congested at all and gives you the liberty to travel when you darn well please without consideration for anyone else. Wouldn't that be nice?

"I thought of it while riding my bicycle" - Albert Einstein,

ARK. BLOG: Great contribution. Thanks.

I used to work in Riverdale. I had to be there at 8:30 am. Traffic is never as bad on Cantrell as University, Markham, and several other roads. I could leave pretty late from the other side of the river and make it on time most mornings, unless something was happening on 30 or the Broadway bridge. I don't see any reason to address this before numerous other problems in other parts of the city.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Life and death
Date: 11/19/2009
By: David Koon

Not many were shocked when Curtis Lavelle Vance was found guilty last week of capital murder, rape, residential burglary and theft of property in the October 2008 beating death of KATV anchor Anne Pressly. /more/

Xmas access nixed
Date: 11/19/2009
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Two weeks ago we reported on the efforts of the Arkansas Society of Freethinkers to put up a winter solstice display on the grounds of the state Capitol. /more/


Charter school wisdom
Date: 11/19/2009
By: Arkansas Times Staff

The state Board of Education last week demonstrated a more searching approach to charter school applications than it has sometimes shown. /more/

Home / Blogs / This Week / Entertainment / Real Estate / Classifieds / Subscribe / Contact