On the trail
Readers mentioned this yesterday. Here's a link to NPR's "Political Junkie," a 30-minute discussion of the Mike Huckabee candidacy including participation by John Brummett. The Club for Growth is touting it for Brummett's purported agreement that Huckabee is no economic conservative.
Here, a Weekly Standard writer notes the Huckabee surge but also writes of the problem that remains from the big-money backbone of the Republican Party.
While the national parties don't exactly have Star Chambers complete with powerful insiders wearing monk's hoods and pulling party strings from a candlelit secret chamber under either the AFL-CIO or Halliburton (depending on the side in question), there is a leadership elite within each party. It is mostly felt on the finance side with big fundraisers and bundling lobbyists buzzing among themselves. These people are mostly pragmatists and many are in DC's professional influence business.
The talk now will be about Huckabee and it won't be good. Most Republican mega-donors don't like Christian candidates. Such candidates have a bad tendency when nominated to bring both general election wipe-outs and problems with big donors' wives, who tend to be pro-choice and socially closer to the local country club than the neighborhood fundamentalist church. Huckabee, with his purist's stand on social issues and a half-baked tax plan with little appeal outside GOP primaries, doesn't look like a winner in a general election, especially at a time when the Republican party is beset with terrific image problems. This is a tough-minded crowd that would rather shoot a slow horse than ride one out of the convention.
While these forces cannot for certain stop Huckabee if he is able to catch fire beyond Iowa, they can make his task much harder.





Comments
As T. S. Eliot wrote in "Murder in the Cathedral," "The last temptation is the greatest treason:/ To do the right thing for the wrong reason." But is that worse than not doing the wrong thing for your wife's reason?
Posted by: Snapback
|
November 30, 2007 11:50 AM
Quin Hillyer & Citizens United Threaten Legal Action Against CNN
Posted by: The Citizens Journal
|
November 30, 2007 11:50 AM
I'm not giving your site any more hits, CJ. There's never any information, just lots of cryptic innuendo and dubious links. I hope it's not supposed to be journalism--you who seem to enjoy impugning Max's credentials on the flimsiest of pretenses.
Try addressing the topic instead of posting non-sequitur hijack attempts.
Posted by: widj
|
November 30, 2007 02:53 PM
Different topic.
I finally got around to reading the long account of Henry Hyde's death and his glowing obit that went on and on and mentioned his role in the stalking of President Clinton, or commonly called the "impeachment of"..... Very noticable in the long story was a major omission about this man's character that would conflict with the positive accounts given. To jog your memory about this hypocrite, click on Cato.
Posted by: Cato
|
November 30, 2007 02:58 PM
Hear Hear Cato....what a bunch of slimy, bottom feeders. I won't shed a tear for any of
those low lifes,,,,may they get as good as they gave.
Posted by: jazzy
|
November 30, 2007 03:43 PM
I did not need the reminder about this blight on the human race, Cato, but thanks, anyway, since I'm sure some had forgotten and some of the young people here were even unaware.
Posted by: durangokid
|
November 30, 2007 04:12 PM
Thanks Cato, how soon we forget, esp when the 'LIBERAL' mainstream media makes no mention of such things. However, bring up Gary Hart and see what happens.
Posted by: eLwood
|
November 30, 2007 05:20 PM