Giving to the Clintons

Here's the long-awaited NY Times examination of giving to the Clinton Library. Some of the same givers have also contributed to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Some of the givers have business interests with governmental concerns. Some gave money but didn't get the decisions they wanted. Some donors were appointed to government commissions. Pretty standard political practice, in other words. The rub, still, is the refusal of the Clinton Foundation to reveal all major donors, even though, by now, most of the heavy hitters are known. Sunshine is the best disinfectant, as always.



Comments
Max,
Explain how six figure speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Library are any better than Huckabee's wedding registry? (Remember Hillary was running for the senate or was a sitting senator during this time.) Ethically they look at least as bad. $40 million in speaking fees alone in 6 years.
Posted by: mpan18
|
December 20, 2007 08:52 AM
the NYT will be publishing the list of donors (asked to raise $500 MILLION) for W's book depository in Dallas, when ?
Posted by: muleboy303
|
December 20, 2007 09:18 AM
"W's book depository in Dallas"
Great name, muleboy.
Posted by: hugh mann
|
December 20, 2007 10:13 AM
tyvm hugh,
i expect there will be alot of "patsies" employed there :)
Posted by: muleboy303
|
December 20, 2007 10:34 AM
Explain how six figure speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Library are any better than Huckabee's wedding registry? - Posted by: mpan18
********
Ludicrous and obscene speaking fees are a perk available to all ex-presidents and I don't begrudge them for grasping for all they can rake in. I do think it is pathetic that they whined about their astronomical legal fees and milked the generous, no make that, gullible, public for contributions to pay their personal debts, knowing that the coming largesse would make that financial blemish look no worse than a pimple.
As for their implied prostituting themselves to library donors - isn't that what most politicians do? This just gives them a better opportunity to milk the system than lesser pols have.
Equally sad - Max only considers their attempts to hide the identities of the johns buying their favors . . . as a "rub". I guess its normal to minimize the sins of those you wish to favor and inflate the sins of those you oppose.
Posted by: Don Keyhotay
|
December 21, 2007 07:32 AM