STFU
Once more, John White had an opportunity to tell the truth, lie or say nothing. And, wouldn't you know it? (This happened to be the general subject of my column this week, too.) There he goes again -- on the subject of the UA's interest in the Wake Forest coach. From the Democrat-Gazette:
“I thought, where is this coming from ?” White said Thursday of media reports that Grobe would be Arkansas’ next coach. “You need to check out your sources.”
Of course, strictly speaking, it is true that Grobe is not the next Hog coach. The question is whether a deal was in the works (it was) and all but completed (it was) and whether White's act was too cutesy by half (it was).
An honorable mention STFU on multiple counts today to Mike Huckabee, who said the question he flunked the other night on his opinion of the national intelligence estimate on Iran (he knew nothing) was a "gotcha question." Yes, indeedy.
"I think I've probably been asked far more questions about my faith than Mitt Romney's been asked about his," Huckabee said. "Maybe I ought to be doing the 'God speech' out there. I might even include an altar call and an offering with mine."
And then there's his answer to Katie Couric's question about his biggest mistake.Huckabee is just too nice a guy.
"I've made a lot of mistakes sometimes, particularly maybe in giving people too much benefit of the doubt -- keeping people in positions who should have been let go. Sometimes you pay a big price for that." [He went on to refer, though not by name, to Randall Bradford, who resigned under pressure as the state's information chief.]
Oh and speaking of STFU: Arianna Huffington more or less issues that response to the Huckster's empty hufffing and puffing about Murray Waas' new blockbuster reporting on the Huffington Post that nailed Huckabee's misjudgment in the case of Wayne Dumond on the wall for the world to see.
On the jump, a Wall Street Journal piece's lead gets Huckabee.
From the Wall Street Journal
Des Moines, Iowa
Stepping out for a press conference here Monday, Mike Huckabee fielded the ultimate question. Just how conservative are you?
"I'm as conservative as anyone could hope to be, or want to be, or needs to be," replied the smiling former Arkansas governor, never missing a beat, and following up with a boilerplate summary of his belief in "lower taxes," the "sanctity of human life" and a "strong military" -- before moving ever so swiftly on to the next question.
It was trademark Huckabee: Sounds great, explains little. It's a strategy that has so far served him well, ...







Comments
Hey, Max. We can't all sit around on our ass and pontificate from your glass tower (wait, its not that big) in Little Rock.
When is Ernie writing your next hit piece?
Posted by: Arkansas Red
|
December 7, 2007 07:13 AM
How many head coaches are going to get the UofA to query them just so they can bleed a few thousand (or hundreds of thousands) out of their institution to not take the Arkansas job?
Of course the UofA comes off looking like the ugliest of wall flowers but that can't be true--King Frank has declared that the UofA job is just about the top of the profession.
And so it goes...
Posted by: esscurve
|
December 7, 2007 08:11 AM
Joe Gibbs......?
Posted by: dowhat
|
December 7, 2007 08:16 AM
My dog could have given a better answer to the NIE question, and he sleeps through half the news.
Posted by: Pavel
|
December 7, 2007 08:16 AM
What difference does it make to the voting public if candidates know anything about the world, nations and leaders? Only one of the last four presidents had any grasp of geography, history and world cultures and he was impeached and the other three lauded by similar idiots. It makes no difference when it comes to electioneering or in running this country, apparently.
Posted by: Cato
|
December 7, 2007 08:29 AM
And....today is Pearl Harbor day and probably many of the candidates don't have a clue unless told by their staffs.
Posted by: Cato
|
December 7, 2007 08:32 AM
John White is a liar.
In fact, he's a lying sack of shit.
Anyone disagree?
Posted by: Mondo Freaks
|
December 7, 2007 09:04 AM
yes, i'm slow sometimes (but not for a pagan-smoker)
it has taken over 35 years, but after watching and listening to Huckabee last night, i now, finally, have some understanding of how black people must have felt when George Wallace appeared on their tv screens.
a most disconcerting mixture of fear, anger, and resolve.
but, as MH raised only $22,000 yesterday (per mikehuckabee.com) perhaps i should relax? HELL NO!
Posted by: muleboy303
|
December 7, 2007 09:42 AM
I expect Huckabee to dance around on this and spin, then when he is asked again later he will say it is old news and has already been dealt with.
That is what Clinton did with bimbo eruptions and travelgate and George W did it with his AWOL in the guard.
That is what happens when one side devises a successful trick and then everyone else uses it.
Remember how the "flip-flop/waffle house" label torpedoed Kerry? Well now the Republicans are using it against each other.
Often in history one army developes a winning strategy or weapon and then it gets improved and used back on the original developer.
Posted by: Citizen home
|
December 7, 2007 09:59 AM
say, what does STFU stand for?
Posted by: IABL1969
|
December 7, 2007 10:59 AM
nevermind. just heard. Shut the %^^& up. I should've gotten that easy one.
Posted by: IABL1969
|
December 7, 2007 11:03 AM
FOOD FOR THOUGHT: Has anyone considered that King Frank may be behind this whole farce - a plan to make Long and White look stupid and ultimately get them fired and take his old job back (AD, not coach). Wouldn't that be something if true. Ole Frankie has been around a long time folks and you gotta figure he would like nothing better than to get even with these whacko's up on the hill. (Caveat: if Frankie was the architect of such a plan, that would not necessarily mean that Long and White were not in fact stupid).
Posted by: RacingMan
|
December 7, 2007 12:33 PM
Certainly this "nobody-wants-to-coach-UA" movement will lead on to better things, which it will, like
being a top-notch University, getting all sorts of 'green-grants' when the Demos return our government back to some form of sanity. Who knows, they may even scrape up enough money for a good stem cell research facility once the hallelujah nutcakes are outed from Pennsylvania Ave.
Chancellor White and Coach Broyles will end up just fine. Recall what John Huston said:
"Time dignifies all things; politicians, old buildings and whores."
.
Posted by: eLwood
|
December 7, 2007 02:12 PM
I don't know Dr. White and certainly don't know whether he is a liar. I do know Harry King's reputation and his reporting jibes with the assertion that
(1) White had the power and perhaps the will to buck the Trustees' plain desire (and perhaps plans) to send Nutt packing, so that White could have backed up his offer to stand with HDN for a miserable final season next year; and
(2) If the Trustees trumped White, it would put the school in danger of being in the "lack of institutional control" category if sanctions again threatened.
On Nov. 27 King wrote
That point {the fractured fan base] may have been driven home Saturday during a meeting with White. The chancellor probably told Nutt that if he wanted to stay, he would "get in the trenches" with him - a phrase White used Monday - but that the criticism would not subside.
It is likely that White then made it clear that if Nutt resigned, he would be given deferred compensation and other money he would have received if he had stayed until 2009. It's possible that Nutt interpreted that to mean that the university wanted him to resign because it was not in a position to fire him.
----
As to whether Dr. White had the power (which is not to say the will) to defy the Board King wrote (Nov. 15):
.
All that aside, note this: "Boards should delegate responsibility for the conduct and control of the athletics department to the institutional chief executive."
That quote is from a statement on Board Responsibilities for Intercollegiate Athletics adopted three years ago by the board of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. That might sound like some ivory tower group sticking its collective nose into athletics, but the NCAA and the AGB are partners in the NCAA's efforts to promote greater accountability for college and university athletics programs.
In fact, all board members at schools in the NCAA's top division are supposed to read and sign the AGB statement, and I'm certain that a copy has been provided each of the 10 people on the UA board.
Under another section of the AGB statement, there is this: "Boards should not be directly involved in the process of hiring and firing coaches or other athletics department personnel."
The AGB report is one of three items cited by an NCAA subcommittee looking at who should be in charge of athletics at a particular institution.
That subcommittee quotes the Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics as saying that trustees must "insist that the president is in control and must support and defend the president."
It also cites NCAA bylaws which say that the institution's chief executive officer is responsible for the administration of all aspects of the athletics program.
"Thus, it is the responsibility of the trustees, in exercising oversight, to ensure presidential control," the subcommittee said.
Posted by: TAP
|
December 7, 2007 03:53 PM