Gas companies must disclose spending
An advisory opinion issued by the Arkansas Ethics Commission this morning said that gas companies must report money spent to defeat a ballot initiative, such as a proposed severance tax increase. The ruling hinged on a liberal interpretation of the term "individual person'." State law only explicitly requires that ballot committees, individual persons, public servants and governmental bodies report expenditures. The Commission ruled that laws enacted for the public benefit -- such as this one -- are to be interpreted most favorably to the public. As full disclosure is in the public interest, corporations should fall under the classification of individual persons and be required to report.
The Ethics Commission ruling was in response to a request from Sheffield Nelson, who is leading the effort to increase the state's natural gas severance tax through a ballot initiative.
Chesapeake, one of the major gas players in Arkansas, responded. "Chesapeake follows both the letter and the spirit of the law in all business practices," said Tom Price Jr., senior vice president, corporate development. Chesapeake did not directly answer whether it would fight the commission's ruling in court. Southwestern Energy hasn't responded to a call for comment.



Comments
Fair enough--I believe it's a broad definition of "person" that allows corporations to contribute to parties and political campaigns in the first place.
Posted by: G.
|
February 15, 2008 12:54 PM
I love it when companies/politicians answer with broad PR generalizations (Chesapeake follows blah blah..) that have little to do with the specifics. (And, yes, I know it's outrageous of me to think it should be otherwise.) Of course, 'they' should be publicly accountable when they enter the public arena. Besides...obeying the letter/spirit of the current Cheney/Halliburton/Enron business model isn't saying much of anything positive. Isn't there a Republican business Rule that says the ends justify the means according to the dollar value. Make enough money and all is OK; conversely, crime and poverty equals GUILT.
Posted by: zelda
|
February 16, 2008 08:11 AM