Arkansas Times

Arkansas Blog

« McCain challenges Obama | Main | Joe White has friends, too »

The senator, UA and Fayetteville High

Courtesy of the Fayetteville Trucker, we have a copy of a letter from state Sen. Sue Madison of Fayetteville to the University of Arkansas Board of Trustees concerning the proposal to sell the existing Fayetteville High School to UA for $59 million.

In short: Bad idea for any number of reasons.

LETTER FROM SEN. SUE MADISON

Dear Uof A Board Members

You are being asked to consider purchasing theFayetteville High School property for $59,000,000.  Throughout State government budgets  are being cut and vacant positions go unfilled.  This is the time to  exercise great restraint in expending public resources and making large  commitments of future funds.

The University of Arkansas has undertaken many construction projects during the past eleven years and our bonded debt has
increased dramatically.  Several properties have been purchased, and many new non-classroom buildings have been constructed.  Yet, tuition is raised every year and faculty and staff salaries remain depressed.

The Fayetteville High School property is not adjacent to the teaching or research areas of the campus, and the announced
purchase price is only a fraction of the cost.  The buildings are not suitable for immediate use and will need considerable
retro-fitting at additional expense.  Debt service and maintenance of the property will preclude addressing more pressing and central educational needs for many years tocome.    
 
Please consider the burden this property will be on our students, the campus, and Arkansas tax payers.  We do not need this property, and I  ask that you decline the offer to purchase it.

Sincerely,

Sen. Sue Madison

Comments

I think it's cute how Sue thinks the UA is at all concerned about "education". That land would either go to 1) expansion of the Razorback Tailgating Experience (TM, Patent Pending), 2) allowing the Waltons and Tysons to build more monuments to themselves or 3) further upscale student housing to provide that "college experience".

The Senator's letter is on the mark. Added thoughts for UA Board and those who may wish to write their own letters:

Value of the 40-acre property (land only): $4-6 million. Assessed value of the buildings is more, but - for what? - a structure deemed technologically inadequate for a public high school. UA will pay top dollar for a facility it cannot use w/o significant additional investment?

Current space utilization on campus (2008 study by facilities management): 20%; peer institutions do not build or expand unless at 60-70%. That's where UA will be in about 40 years ... let them negotiate then.

Current bond-indebtedness by the university = $312 million; annual payments about $35 million ... very nearly the size of the Fulbright College annual budget.

Likely fee increase to students to fund the $59 million price tag: at least $9 per credit hour (though may start smaller and climb after four years ... hmmm) - $1100 tax on every UA student for the life of the bond. Should the good people of Dumas subsidize a new high school for Fayetteville?

Likilihood of passed millage (the district will still need at least four mills), particularly at new location and in the current economic climate? Slim. (2005 millage - for teacher pay and technology upgrades - failed 61-39.)

So: all the risk to UA - of alienating the legislature, students, faculty, and staff - with a low probability of ending up with the property.

Can't blame them for looking, but can blame them if they don't ultimately say "no thanks ... not at that price."

Both the UA and the Fayetteville School Board are also decreeing that they are buying Hummers for all staff fleets, and requiring Hummer ownership for all students, faculty and staff. UA BOT member Johnny Tyson said, "there is just too much money not to waste as much as possible," and Fayetteville School Superintendent Bobby New quipped, "we'll show those self-interested special interest groups who vote down our millage increases that the courts can force a millage increase if we can just demonstrate enough want."

Let's see here....the State School System wants to purchase land from the Local School System.

How does this work? I guess I'm not familiar with the way the establishment is established, but does it not seem as though the UofA is unaccountable? Board of Trustees - appointed by? Removable by? Balanced budgets required by?

Further, how does the local populace, who may not agree with the UofA (or other University for that matter) incite or show a lack of cooperative spirit with the locals?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

More not to like
Date: 11/20/2008
By: Gerard Matthews

The state's environmental protection agency does not require operators of drilling-mud dump sites to post assurances that they'll pay for clean-up of the sites. /more/
>> Progress on Fourche

Sellers' market
Date: 11/20/2008
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Today, there are 15,072 licensed real estate agents in Arkansas. /more/


You get what you pay for
Date: 11/20/2008
By: Arkansas Times Staff

According to Rep. Keven Anderson of Rogers, Gov. Mike Beebe's proposed budget including another tax cut "borders on genius." /more/

Home / Blogs / This Week / Entertainment / Real Estate / Classifieds / Subscribe / Contact