Hot enough for you?
It's gonna get hotter.
After a lengthy period of dithering, the Arkansas Department of, ahem, Environmental Quality has approved the air permit for the greenhouse gas-belching coal-fired power plant that SWEPCO wants to build down in Hempstead County.
UPDATE: Glen Hooks, local representative of the Sierra Club, weighs in. Read his comments on the jump.
Comments from Glen Hooks of the Sierra Club:
"While state after state has rejected dirty coal and embraced clean energy sources, Arkansas has taken a step backward that puts our environmental and public health at risk. Our Governor's Commission on Global Warming got it right when it recently recommended rejecting coal-fired power plants for our state. Unfortunately, despite the incredible amounts of pollution that will occur, ADEQ has chosen to issue an air permit for the Turk plant."
"Literally thousands of Arkansans have called on Governor Beebe and the ADEQ to reject the Turk plant, and the Arkansas environmental community stands in unanimous opposition to its construction. This battle is not over. Expect that Sierra Club and our allies will use every tool in our arsenal and fight this plant until absolutely all avenues have been exhausted, up to and including legal challenges. The health of our citizens and the health of our environment demand nothing less."
ADEQ ISSUES AIR PERMIT FOR COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC PLANT
The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has approved a final air permit for construction and operation of a coal-fired electric power plant in Hempstead County. The permit, signed November 5, was issued to Southwest Electric Power Co. (SWEPCO), a unit of American Electric Power (AEP) for construction of the John W. Turk, Jr., generating plant near Fulton.
The permit application had been under review by the ADEQ for more than two years, and was the subject of two public hearings and two separate public comment periods totaling more than three months, during which hundreds of interested parties offered comments on the proposed permit.
“This is a complex and controversial permit application,” ADEQ Director Teresa Marks said. “It has undergone a lengthy review by technical and legal personnel to make sure the permit is protective of public health and the environment by conforming to all applicable air emission standards under state and federal laws.”
The main steam generating unit consists of one ultra-supercritical pulverized coal boiler fueled by low sulfur coal and natural gas which will power a single steam turbine designed for base load operation with a nominal net power output of 600 megawatts.
The permit contains emission limits for such pollutants as particulates, sulfur dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and mercury. There are no limits in the permit for carbon dioxide (CO2), which currently is not subject to emission limits under federal or state regulations.
However, the Turk plant design includes a 20-acre area for the inclusion of CO2 capture equipment, should future regulations impose CO2 emission limits.
“It is quite possible CO2 emission standards will be adopted at the federal level and in Arkansas as well in a few years,” Marks noted. “The ADEQ and the operators of all permitted coal-fired electric plants in the state--as well as a variety of other industrial and commercial operations with significant CO2 emissions--are aware of this possibility and are already considering options to address the issue of CO2 emissions as quickly as possible once standards are in place.”
Currently, Arkansas has six permitted coal-fired electric generating units; two near Redfield in Jefferson County, two near Batesville in Independence County, one near Gentry in Benton County, and one near Osceola in Mississippi County.
A fact sheet with additional information about the Turk Plant permit is available on the ADEQ internet web site, www.adeq.state.ar.us, in the “Hot Topics” box on the right-hand side of the web site home page.



Comments
"Bidness" as usual for AR "regulators!" Ho-hum, won't change until REAL political leadership emerges...
|
Posted by: Larry
|
November 5, 2008 02:54 PM
Ok! Let's light this candle for Hempstead County! You too get to join the Texas Clear Skies Initiative.
What's that you say....Jobs created while you cough and your children get asthma and your
farm ponds, creeks, and small lakes die from acidification....
Yes, Texas skies remain clear while Arkansas coal-produced electricity is streamed to Texas.
Helluva deal ! Thanks guv. It takes a lot to be the cheap whore for Texas. Y'all smile.
.
Posted by: eLwood
|
November 5, 2008 03:00 PM
Sent to Director Marks via website form:
ADEQ... We Protect and Enhance Arkansas' Environment?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You and your entire "regulatory" agency are a sick joke, ON us!! "Bidness" as usual drives everything you do - why not just be honest and admit it? The approval of the Hempstead County coal-fired plant in light of what's happening in the world re climate change, Carbon loading, etc. is inexplicable and inexcusable. YOU and your entire agency SUCK SWAMP WATER!!!
|
Posted by: Larry
|
November 5, 2008 03:04 PM
It is frustrating that they just told SWEPCO they can emit mercury, acetaldehyde. acrolein, antimony, arsenic, benzene, benyl chloride, beryllium, butadiene, cadmium, carbon disulfide, chloroform, chromium VI, cobalt, cyanide, dichlorobenzene, dimethyl sulfate, dioxins, formaldehyde, hexane, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride, lead, manganese, methylhydrazine, nickel, phenol, selenium, sulfuric acid, toluene, xylene, and ammonia into our state's air. What benefit does Arkansas stand to get from this? 1/20th the jobs that the wind industry has promised us in just the last year. We don't need the energy from this plant and we sure don't need its pollution!
Posted by: JohnnieC
|
November 5, 2008 03:22 PM
One day AFTER the election. Folks, this is not over yet.
Posted by: lemthree
|
November 5, 2008 03:53 PM
Don't worry, Obama will tax the plant out of existence. Of course, the tax will be passed on to rate payers... Obama has promised to make it so expensive to operate coal plants, that they will go bankrupt. Unfortunately, he also opposes even nuclear energy.
Posted by: Severus
|
November 5, 2008 05:18 PM
Severus--if you read Obama's entire comment rather than just a snippet, there is actually more to this. What Obama said was that Congress was likely to enact a cap-and-trade system, which would regulate CO2 emissions and assess a "carbon tax" on each ton of CO2. This is done to create incentives for emitters to be as clean as possible. Those who don't try and clean up their emissions will find it financially impossible to stay open. He didn't say that he would bankrupt the coal industry--he said they'd go bankrupt under a cap-and-trade system if they didn't go cleaner.
Sounds a little less sinister than McCain/Palin made it sound, eh? Cap-and-trade was going to happen whether McCain or Obama was elected. So, in reality, McCain was committed to the exact same thing that Obama was.
Posted by: Lorax
|
November 5, 2008 05:43 PM
This issue demonstrates that liberal values concern benefits to others, conservative values concern benefit to self.
On this issue liberals are ready to have higher energy costs to ensure healthy air for all. Conservatives want local jobs and taxes and others have pollution.
Look across most liberal and conservative issues and notice this trend.
Posted by: Citizen1
|
November 5, 2008 06:09 PM
If Obama opposes nuclear energy, and puts in cap and trade policies that make the coal energy companies actually clean up their act or go broke, I'm all for it. We have the alternatives, and should invest in them NOW in a big way. Let the coal and nuclear industries go the way of the buggy whip businesses, or even go completely extinct like so many of the animals and plants are doing from our predatory ways.
Unfortunately, Obama sided with the nuclear power folks when it came to emissions, so I'm not convinced he will try to phase them out completely.
Posted by: rablib
|
November 7, 2008 12:11 AM