No sewage in the watershed

View of Lake Maumelle from Pinnacle Mountain
There’s been a lot of talk lately about what can be done to protect the Lake Maumelle watershed, a source of drinking water for about 95 percent of Pulaski County as well as other areas in the state. Efforts by Central Arkansas Water to change a Pollution Control and Ecology Commission regulation that allows surface discharge of wastewater in the watershed have been unsuccessful. Martin Maner, the director of CAW, has called the issue a no-brainer. It seems fairly obvious that sewage should not be dumped into the drinking supply, but efforts to codify such a rule have been opposed by the PC&E commission. One commissioner, Tom Scheuck, is an investor, along with Jay DeHaven, in some property in the watershed that could be developed with homes not attached to Little Rock sewer service.
Recently, there have been reports on an effort to buy land around the lake to protect it from development. Today, Rep. John Edwards, D-Little Rock, filed HB 1746, that would prevent the surface discharge of wastewater from a wastewater treatment plant, sewage treatment plant, package plant or similar facility into the Lake Maumelle watershed, as well as 29 other watersheds around the state.
Edwards has kept the bill quiet for some time, trying to build support among other legislators. It looks like that worked. Sen. Bob Johnson, D-Bigelow, will be the bill’s sponsor in the Senate. Two sessions ago, Johnson opposed efforts to protect the Maumelle watershed from development. Johnson's support should increase the bill's chances of passing in the Senate. Edwards was quick to stress that the bill was not an effort to step on the toes of ADEQ or to do their job for them, but to give the agency the tools it needed to protect the quality of water in the state.



Comments
Yikes, that image of Lake Maumelle is a 2.7 megabyte download.
Posted by: Arkansas Blogger
|
March 2, 2009 02:32 PM
Buying land in the watershed should be a priority right now. Land prices should be down and staying down. CAWater should have been adding acreage since when the lake was first developed.
Wouldn't now be a good time to put petroleum in the strategic reserve? We were doing it when oil was over $150 but now we stop and to my knowledge haven't restarted even though oil is in the $30/40 range.
Oh well, I have to beleive that people far smarter than me are making those decisions.
Posted by: Citizen1
|
March 2, 2009 03:11 PM
The new picture is much better, only 103K.
Posted by: Arkansas Blogger
|
March 2, 2009 03:29 PM
ADEQ doesn't need its toes stepped on. It need a good, firm kick in the ass.
.
Posted by: eLwood
|
March 2, 2009 04:40 PM
Citizen1: "Oh well, I have to beleive that people far smarter than me are making those decisions."
Yeah, right....
Posted by: Perplexed
|
March 2, 2009 05:02 PM
ADEQ might as well as not even exist. Or it at least change its name to ADDEQ (Arkansas Department for Destruction of Environmental Quality).
Work done without permits? Don't worry about.
Dump drilling liquids into flowing streams? Don't report it as we don't care.
Posted by: Roger
|
March 2, 2009 06:01 PM
Someone ought to put forward an initiated act to get rid of the ADEQ and replace it an organization charged with protecting our environment.
It is corrupt, with committee members making decisions based on their own financial interests, no different than bribery except they're paying themselves off.
Posted by: jojo_mojo
|
March 2, 2009 06:35 PM