No climate change at Capitol
The utility companies are still running things. Energy efficiency and conservation legislation got squashed today. Report on the jump from the devoted idealists of the Arkansas Citizens First Congress. (If they'd adopt a page from the polluters' book and their "Environmental Federation" and come up with a misleading name like Utilities First Congress, maybe they'd get somewhere.)
Gov. Beebe's office expressed "disappointment" at the rejection of Rep. Kathy Webb's sweeping conservation bill.
Also on the jump: Comment from Ken Smith of Audubon Arkansas (not Arkansas Audubon as originally written, a different group), who commented on the failure to ask for a roll call on Webb's bill: "I would have liked to hear how members of the House Insurance and Commerce Committee would respond to local voters on why they voted against weatherization of homes and businesses and reducing utility bills."
I'd like to know how many of the committee members have supped on the utility companies' credit cards and gone on their junkets.
There is a roll call on the weatherization bill. On the jump.
RELEASE FROM CITIZENS FIRST CONGRESS
LITTLE ROCK - The House Insurance and Commerce Committee today failed to
pass two energy bills that would have provided more efficient and
environmentally friendly energy in Arkansas. Both bills were opposed by
several utilities companies.
"Energy efficiency is the least expensive and cleanest way to meet our
energy needs; it saves consumers hundreds of millions of dollars and it
creates jobs," said Eddy Moore of the Arkansas Citizens First Congress.
"Renewable energy is simply the way of the future."
"Though these bills are a win-win for everyone, the utilities have argued
for guaranteed profits from increasing consumer bills, not lower energy
demand from conservation or competition from renewable energy. We are
trying to protect consumers and create jobs, but the utilities are
shamefully costing Arkansans millions of dollars with their opposition,"
said Moore.
House Bill 1903 by state Rep. Joan Cash of Jonesboro was referred to an
interim study. It would have given rebates and incentives to Arkansas
homeowners and businesses to make our homes and workplaces more energy
efficient. The program would have led to an estimated consumer savings of up
to $700 million over the next 10 years and created new jobs across the
state. 18 other states have similar programs. The interim study will take
place before the next legislative session.
"We will continue working for cheaper and cleaner energy at the Public
Service Commission and through the legislative interim studies to come,"
said Moore. "We thank Governor Beebe, Attorney General McDaniel, and Public
Service Commission Chair Paul Suskie for their strong support."
The committee rejected House Bill 1851 by Rep. Kathy Webb of Little Rock
which would have helped consumers and businesses upgrade to renewable energy
and would have helped Arkansas become a leader in the rapidly growing field
of renewable energy - a benefit that is sorely needed in today's economy.
"Change is coming," said Moore. "We hoped to change energy policy in a
positive way for everyone in Arkansas, but instead we'll go back to the
drawing table."
STATEMENT FROM KEN SMITH, ARKANSAS AUDUBON
The Energy Efficiency Bill, HB 1903, sponsored by Representative Joan Cash was sent today to interim study or in other words died for lack of support. Opposition from the Arkansas public utility monopoly and the state chamber of commerce was just too strong for the conservation community to overcome. Representative Cash also was too kind by not insisting on a vote and a roll call. I would have liked to hear how members of the House Insurance and Commerce Committee would respond to local voters on why they voted against weatherization of homes and businesses and reducing utility bills. While it is true that Arkansas ratepayers would see a cost on their electric and gas bills to pay for energy efficiency programs, however with rebates and other energy efficiency programs made possible by the energy efficiency bill, Arkansas homeowners and businesses would consume less energy and thus have lower utility bills – more money in their pockets for the mortgage and groceries and new shoes for the kids. A strong state energy efficiency program also creates jobs in every community in Arkansas. Electricians, plumbers, carpenters, HVAC installers, and roofers are all needed to make homes and businesses more energy efficient. These same professionals and their skills are needed for building renewable energy sources for homes and businesses -- solar hot water heaters, solar panels for electricity, or small wind turbines for home and business use.
The Center for American Progress, a Washington D.C. think tank released a study last September, “Green Recovery – A Program to Create Good Jobs and Start Building a Low-Carbon Economy,” in which it documented that with reasonable investments over ten years at the federal and state level in energy efficiency, renewable energy, mass transportation, and smart grid that Arkansas, for example, could realize almost 20,000 jobs. The new wind turbine blade companies in Little Rock and Jonesboro give us some idea of what could come if the Public Utilities and Chamber of Commerce would start by supporting cost-effective energy efficiency and renewable energy programs – then our Arkansas Legislators would feel more emboldened to support government and citizen-led initiatives like HB 1903
ROLL CALL ON HB1851 -- Renewable Energy Refit
6 YES
Hawkins
Maxwell
Cooper
Rainey
Hyde
Ingram
8 NO
Martin
Hardy
Wells
Dunn
Glidewell
Hoyt
Lovell
Wagner
2 Did Not Vote
Allen
Woods
4 Absent
Abernathy
Maloch
Green
Lewellen



Comments
Max, I applaud you for sending a reporter to cover the meeting, but we need to get one thing straight. HB 1903 was about setting energy efficiency performance standards in this state. HB 1851 was for REFIT (Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariff). The word conservation has a specific meaning in the energy world, and it applies to neither of the bills. I hope you would rephrase the story and say it was about energy efficiency and renewable energy.
Many environmental fields have a lingo of their own, so I understand how people can become confused. The fact that the Times, as well as many legislators, had a hard time understanding these bills shows that we need to continue to educate people.
Posted by: zaoy
|
April 1, 2009 05:52 PM
Speaking of jargon, at least he didn't try to tell us what HYPOGYCGOUDOLEBOISM meant. I'm glad to see the legislature is going for broke in accomplishing nothing this session.
Posted by: jcd
|
April 1, 2009 06:07 PM
The Arkansas legislature is still #1- in backwardness. And we wonder why the world is in such a mess?
Posted by: Sound Policy
|
April 1, 2009 06:28 PM
"The Arkansas legislature is still #1- in backwardness. And we wonder why the world is in such a mess?"
This only explains why Arkansas is such a mess.
Posted by: livelightly
|
April 1, 2009 07:09 PM
Click on the link for what the bills were really about.
Correction - there was a roll call on HB 1851.
Eddy Moore with the Citizens' First Congress will be on KARN, tomorrow at 8:10 am to discuss HB1903. Check it out!
Posted by: zaoy
|
April 1, 2009 07:31 PM
I understand that the Gov has a secret plan to put a halt to all of this ugly global warming. He is proposing that we put regulators on every Arkansan that measures the number of exhales that a person does per day. Anything over a certain number of exhales will be taxed. Since exhales by human beings represent a very significant amount of carbon dioxide emissions then should give us quite a bit of tax revenue. Isn't the Gov really 'creative'?
Posted by: Irishman
|
April 1, 2009 08:54 PM
We now have our own game of ..............THE BIGGEST LOSER...........
starring--The Ark Legislature.
Posted by: eLwood
|
April 1, 2009 09:14 PM
Personally, I don't have a problem with carbon dioxide. Some of my best exhales have been in CO2. It has no odor and really makes things green. I think you need to get more in touch with your CO2 side. Don't you? I think that 'carbon units' need to embrace that part of their being.
Posted by: Irishman
|
April 1, 2009 09:21 PM
Irishman --
I am SO with you regarding CO2. I've felt this way all my life, so your affirmation here is great.
I can breathe easier, knowing I'm not alone.
Now, there's this whole mishigas raging on this other blog about whether Michaei Flatley's "Lord of the Dance" touring companies or Planet Earth's collective intestinal bovine methane gases pose the greater threat to the planet's Ecosphere.
I'm leaning toward the cow fart model, though I'm open to incoming data from NASA.
You?
Posted by: NormaBates
|
April 1, 2009 09:52 PM
Irishman, these bills weren't about CO2 and climate change. They were about insulating attics, installing efficient HVAC systems, and creating jobs for solar panel installers. Constructing a new power plant creates about 1.2 jobs. Energy efficiency creates about 8. The bills were about job creation, not CO2. Oh, and to attract more money from $20B that the federal government allocated for energy efficiency. Eighteen other states already have similar bills, including Texas. My money is on Arkansas being the 49th state to adopt these bills.
Posted by: zaoy
|
April 1, 2009 09:52 PM
Are some people really going to believe C02 output from human's compares to the volume of C02 output from vehicle emissions? I'm not sure what they are more ignorant of - biology or chemistry.
Posted by: Ron Rizzardi
|
April 1, 2009 10:02 PM