Arkansas Times

Arkansas Blog

« Take this job... | Main | Rove's work for Tim Griffin »

Candidate Baker emerges?

State Sen. Gilbert Baker has issued a murky statement today relative to U.S. Sen. Blanche Lincoln and health care. It reads like one of those overboiled DOG editorials, with the subliminal message that Lincoln is determined to force Soviet-style medical care down the throats of a happy populace perfectly happy with U.S. health care.

Clearer Baker translation: "No credible Republican opponent has emerged to challenge Lincoln. Our polling numbers show a credible challenger could make a race against her. If I can spin this health care thing right, I just might be that candidate."

NEWS RELEASE FROM STATE SEN. GILBERT BAKER

Caution Ahead: Healthcare Reform
 
Conway – “For the last several weeks I have watched the debate surrounding comprehensive healthcare reform.   It is amazing the number of calls I have received and conversations I have had regarding this critical issue.  As an on-looker, I have found myself cheering for Congressman Mike Ross as he has attempted to slow down this government train and control costs.  He and I may not always agree, but his conservative approach should be commended. 
 
“I’ve stood aside and listened to Senator Lincoln state many times, “we must do something.”  I agree; but we must be careful not to do the wrong thing and jeopardize the necessary medical care for patients.  There is now a need for all Arkansans to speak out and make sure these reforms do not weaken our current healthcare system. 
 
“Arkansans are tired of government bailouts and government intervention.  We are told it is America’s obligation to fix this “broken” system.  This is true, but there is a great disconnect between the talks taking place in Washington D.C. and what my constituents are saying to me on the streets of Conway, Arkansas. 
 
“We can all agree that there are improvements that need to be made to our healthcare system in access, affordability, and delivery of care.  However, the approach to solving this problem may be where we disagree. 
 
“It will be a mistake to allow a government takeover of our healthcare system that currently satisfies more than 200 million Americans.  More specifically, a recent bi-partisan survey of Arkansans shows that 86% of people are satisfied with the quality of healthcare their family receives.  
 
“By allowing the federal government to be the central provider in this system, we can only expect to see quality decline.  I cannot imagine the same federal government that responded to Hurricane Katrina controlling healthcare for all Americans.
 
“The bottom line is that Arkansans do not want additional government bureaucracy to make it more expensive and harder to receive medical care.  We are opposed to a federal government provider healthcare system, and I have serious concerns about Senator Lincoln’s “cooperative” system.  I believe this is nothing more than a backdoor approach for government-run healthcare, paid for by more borrowed federal dollars.  
 
“The solutions to healthcare reform must be driven by competition, transparency, and empowering consumers without raising taxes.   Healthcare consumers must know what they are getting in terms of value and cost.  Overall, consumers and competition should drive our healthcare system. 
 
“Healthcare reform is critical, but my fear is taking a “just do something” approach will lead to government-run healthcare resulting in decreased quality and access to those who need it most.” 

Comments

My state senator is so disgusting. See why we have to take an anti-acid and vote for Blanc?

Gil, can I call you Gil? You can call me Sound or SP. I have a few questions after reading your press release:

1) Of the 86% of people you say a recent bi-partisan poll says are satisfied with their health care, you do understand a large percentage of them are covered by government run health care plans- the military, elderly (Medicare), federal employees, low income (Medicaid), children (SCHIP), etc., right? Since you are opposed to government run healthcare, I assume you in favor of privatizing healthcare for the military, elderly, federal employees, low income, children, etc.? Please answer yes or no.

2) You say: "By allowing the federal government to be the central provider in this system, we can only expect to see quality decline." Re question #1 above- do you believe health care to the military, elderly, federal employees, low income, children, etc. is of lower quality than that provided by the private sector? Please answer yes or no and document your answer.

3) You say: "I cannot imagine the same federal government that responded to Hurricane Katrina controlling healthcare for all Americans." Now that's a statement every American would agree with. But maybe you have forgotten that the previous federal administration, you remember W and Brownie, are members of your team. W ran on a platform of making sure government would not and could not work, and they succeeded re Hurricane Katrina beyond their wildest dreams. The results of Republican inaction were scandalous. Are you saying that W should have been impeached re his malfeasance in office regarding Katrina? Please answer yes or no.

4) Finally, you say: "The bottom line is that Arkansans do not want additional government bureaucracy to make it more expensive and harder to receive medical care." That is clearly not the brightest thing you have ever said in a press release. Gil, the point of health care reform is to ensue health care is available to everyone (not just the lucky ones like you and me), remains affordable for all (a rapidly diminishing circumstance) and provides high quality so maybe, just maybe, America won't be something like 38th in lifespan among developed countries. Question- do you accept campaign contributions from health insurance companies with a vested interest in making as much money as possible despite the consequences for the American people?

Gil, I'm holding my breath until you respond.

Gawd. I might have to choose between Gil and Miz Blanche? Put a stiff shot of booze in my Mylanta, Alligatorgar.

You know what is so pathetic? Is how stupid these Dog's and the such think we are. They keep telling us we don't want a Government run health program, but they better not mess with our Medicare! They don't know, we already know, that we have had Government run health for years. Think about it people!!!

The worse thing WE can do BAKER! Is not DO NOTHING AT ALL!!!!!

Reminds me of Krugman the other night on John Stewart. Stewart skewered him on public health care, seizing on Krugman's assertion that military health care was one of the best systems in the country. Stewart pointed out that it was a system operated by the government. Krugman agreed, but said it was more expensive that way, but Vets and war monger, eh, heroes deserved that level of care. More than the average Joe whose rights they defend anyway.

Krugman squirmed.


Gil has to slug his way out of a what? A threesome so far:

Car dealer-Jew baiter,
Christian Identity Colonel

Was there another one?

I have been watching this circus called the Great 2010 Arkansas Senate Hunt for the last few weeks. Seems like the Republicans continue to be in a different era of Arkansas history. Then this guy Trevor Drown shows up as an independent and things really take off. He is running rings around the other eight or so and doing his own thing. I looked at his website he has some promise. Sadly, he is kind of unaware of the way things work. It is not the 10,000 signatures he has to worry about. It is the Arkansas National Guard. I retired out of there and I saw nepotism and favoritism of the first order. We have a Democratic US Senator and a Governor. The Governor appoints the Adjucent General to run the Guard. So it is a political appointment. If and when Drown is percevied as a seious threat, a few words will be made in the right ears and he will be deployed thus ending his entire efforts. Some will argue that won't happen and it is not right. But the reality is the senior leadership of the Guard know which way their bread is buttered and they will come up with every way they can to make sure he is not a threat.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Campaign climate
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Paul Barton

A paper published by a think tank last month warned that Sen. Blanche Lincoln's ascendancy to the Agriculture Committee chairmanship was a bad omen for passage of climate-change legislation in 2010 due to her close ties to agricultural producers and processors seen as major contributors of greenhouse gases. /more/

Nurturing fiction
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Last Wednesday, a column by Cathy Frye appeared in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette under the headline "Mothers in Haiti Face Living Nightmare." But Frye has never been to Haiti. /more/


Return of Count Ed
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Dracula can't stop biting necks and Ed Bethune can't stop debasing Arkansas politics. Persistence is but one of the traits they share. /more/

Home / Blogs / This Week / Entertainment / Ark. News Headlines / Multimedia / Classifieds / Subscribe / Contact