Arkansas Times

Arkansas Blog

« Unemployment rising | Main | Government health care »

Big guns leveled at Pryor, Lincoln

Surprise. The Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce does not want debate to open on health care legislation in the Senate. It wants it killed dead, now. It is rallying troops to pressure Sens. Pryor and Lincoln to filibuster what is traditionally a routine procedure to open debate.

Pryor has already indicated he'd allow debate. Lincoln has been holding out, but Sen. Ben Nelson provides the template for an aye vote to open debate:

This weekend, I will vote for the motion to proceed to bring that debate onto the Senate floor," Nelson says. "The Senate should start trying to fix a health care system that costs too much and delivers too little for Nebraskans."

"In my first reading," Nelson said, "I support parts of the bill and oppose others I will work to fix. If that's not possible, I will oppose the second cloture motion--needing 60 votes--to end debate, and oppose the final bill."

On the jump is the chamber's e-mail to its people (you can use the same instructions to send a different message to the senators):

Dear Friends and Family,
 
Rarely, if ever, have I bothered my friends and family with "work" information. However, due to the serious nature of what is going on in Washington, I am compelled to write today and encourage you to contact Arkansas's U.S. Senators (Lincoln and Pryor) and urge them to vote against a "cloture" vote on health care reform tomorrow night.
 
I am forwarding a special newsletter that I just prepared and will send to the 1200+ member businesses of the Arkansas State Chamber/AIA and will hopefully be forwarded by the local chambers across the state to their members potentially reaching over 30,000 people.
 
Please review this information and if you agree, contact Senators Lincoln and Pryor today.
 
Thanks,
Kenny Hall
 
Congressional Update
Friday, November 20, 2009
 
 
U.S. SENATE TO CONSIDER HEALTH CARE REFORM SATURDAY NIGHT
***URGE SENATORS LINCOLN & PRYOR TO VOTE AGAINST CLOTURE***
Tomorrow night the United States Senate will take a vote on one of the most significant pieces of legislation in decades. The vote is a procedural vote called “cloture”, which would move the U.S. Senate closer to a final vote on health care legislation.
 
Immediately below is the entire text of a letter that the State Chamber/AIA faxed to Senators Lincoln and Pryor this morning. As you can see, we are asking the Senators to vote AGAINST cloture tomorrow night and we ask you to help by making similar pleas to both Senators.
 
You may send your comments by fax or email. Your comments can be as simple as a handwritten statement like, “please vote AGAINST cloture on health care reform” or as complex as you wish to write. Here is the contact information for each Senator:
 
Senator Blanche Lincoln
Fax:  202-228-1371
Web site (for email contact) http://lincoln.senate.gov
 
Senator Mark Pryor
Fax:  202-228-0908
Web site (for email contact) http://pryor.senate.gov
 
Following the letter below is a report from the National Association of Manufacturers that discusses the process and analyzes the potential votes on this major legislative issue. As you can see, our Senator’s votes are pivotal, which means your input will have an impact on the outcome of this vote.
   
 
STATE CHAMBER/AIA LETTER TO SENATORS LINCOLN AND PRYOR
 
Dear Senators Lincoln and Pryor:
 
On behalf of our nearly 1,200 member businesses across the state we are writing again today to urge you to vote against cloture and the current bills regarding health care reform—the Senate Finance Committee bill, the Senate HELP Committee bill and the recently passed H.R. 3962.
 
We agree that America needs some reform of its health care system, but all of the current Congressional proposals are, in our opinion, too much, too soon, too costly and all are loaded with potentially adverse unintended consequences. We believe better reform can be accomplished by taking incremental, manageable steps as opposed to wholesale, difficult to measure changes.
 
Reducing the cost of health care must be a priority and this can be done without the major sea changes in the current proposals. Many companies, such as Safeway, Whole Foods, Theda Care and others, are currently getting good results. Their costs are not out of control. On the contrary, they are achieving reductions in costs and increased satisfaction levels with their employees. There are many innovative programs like theirs that Congress should nurture and encourage.
 
All of the current Congressional proposals are simply too costly to employers—especially small businesses—to state governments, and to taxpayers. Our businesses are hurting and cannot afford more sudden and dramatic cost increases. The bills’ cost increases and political payoffs to unions and other special interests will kill more jobs at a time when our country must create jobs.
 
One of the ways meaningful health care reform can be accomplished in a much less costly manner is through incremental changes in the insurance system. Some of the areas where changes could help include; pre-existing condition clauses, guaranteed issue, and 90-180 day eligibility periods in automatic enrollment clauses. We believe more people currently without insurance would obtain insurance if there were subsidies for those who cannot afford it and an individual obligation to be covered. There could also be great savings if tort reform measures were passed that would allow physicians to stop practicing defensive medicine.
 
Health savings accounts coupled with high deductible insurance coverage are just now beginning to produce their promised consumer behavior changes; better individual decisions based on cost awareness and market-based information. This progress will be forfeited under any of the three bills proposed.
 
Finally, we are steadfast in our belief in the American system of free enterprise. The creation of a vibrant marketplace with interstate purchasing options and the formation of association and group purchasing plans will stimulate competition, lower costs and allow more Americans to have health insurance.
 
Senator, your vote is critical in stopping a politically biased rush to judgment on one sixth of our country’s economy. It would be disastrous to pass a bill to address 15% of the population at the expense of the other 85%. Please find a way to help those who need coverage without limiting access and raising costs on those who have health coverage by voting against cloture on all of the currently pending health care bills and against any of the current bills that might come up for a floor vote.
 
Sincerely,
 
Randy Wilbourn, Chairman                       Ray Dillon, Chairman
Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce  Associated Industries of Arkansas
 
Randy Zook                                                  Kenneth R. Hall
President & CEO                                         Executive Vice President
 
 
FROM THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTUERS
Saturday Night Senate Test Vote Could Ride On Three Moderate Democrats.
The AP (11/20) reports the Senate "will hold its first vote on health care legislation on Saturday night and Democrats will need 60 votes to prevail." Majority Leader Harry Reid "announced the schedule on the Senate floor, one day after unveiling a nearly $1 trillion bill to expand health coverage."
       
The CBS Evening News (11/19, lead story, 2:30, Couric) opened with the healthcare story, reporting, "It's down now to two healthcare reform bills, the one the House passed two weeks ago and the one" Reid has finalized. Reid "hasn't locked up the 60 votes he needs to get it through. His bill would extend coverage to 94 percent of Americans, the House bill, 96 percent." ABC World News (11/19, story 3, 2:35, Gibson) said the Senate bill is "one of the most expensive bills ever taken up by Congress. The legislation runs more than 2,000 pages. It would take an estimated 48 hours to read it."
       
The New York Times (11/20, A24, Pear) says the Saturday vote will be "on whether to take up the legislation." Reid "refused to say Thursday whether he had the 60 votes needed to clear that procedural hurdle." The Senate bill "would spend $821 billion over 10 years on Medicaid and subsidies. The House bill would spend 25 percent more: $1.03 trillion over 10 years."
       
The Washington Post (11/20, A1, Montgomery, Murray) says in a front page story Reid "worked Thursday to nail down the votes" needed. Reid is focusing on Sens. Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln, and Ben Nelson, "moderate Democrats who oppose various provisions in the bill and have not declared whether they will support efforts to advance it." Sen. Joseph Lieberman said he "will vote with Democrats on Saturday to begin debate. But Lieberman has said he would vote against final passage if the bill includes any version of a government insurance plan." Politico (11/20, Raju) says Lieberman's "threat to filibuster any health care bill with a public option could kill health reform this year -- and embolden Democratic challengers who'd like to send him packing in 2012."
       
The Washington Times (11/20, Haberkorn) states that "Democratic leaders don't yet have the 60 votes required to start formal floor debate on the health care reform bill." The Times says the three moderates want a chance to review the bill in advance. If they "don't budge, Democratic leaders are also pursuing moderate Republicans, though at least one said the conversations haven't been backed up with any changes to the legislation." Sen. Olympia Snowe said she "won't support the bill because it doesn't do enough to make insurance affordable and protect small businesses."
       
In contrast to the Times, the AP (11/20, Espo) says "there were growing indications Democrats would prevail" on the initial vote, saying none of the three moderates "has announced a plan to defect."
       
NAM Opposes Senate Healthcare Bill As Too Burdensome For Manufacturers. In a press release (11/20), the NAM President John Engler responded to the release of Senate Majority Leader Reid's (D-NV) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Engler said, "Manufacturers entered into the health care debate supportive of the need for health care reform that lowers costs, but that is not the direction Congress is going." The Senate bill "released by Majority Leader Reid and the bill passed by the House of Representatives add massive additional financial burdens to businesses that are already struggling in this recession." The NAM also "opposes an excise tax on health insurance plans as it will add costs to manufacturers and employees." Reform "should focus on reducing costs, improving access and preserving what is working in the current system. When our economy is still struggling deeply and unemployment is at a record high, it is not the right time to put more burdens on America's job creators."
 
 
EMPLOYERS FOR QUALITY HEALTH CARE
To assist our members understand and communicate on this issue, the Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce and the Associated Industries of Arkansas joined a nationwide coalition of State Chambers and similar business organizations named, “Employers for Quality Health Care.” This coalition has established a web site that provides information on the health care reform debate in Washington and a method of communicating with members of Congress if you chose to not do so direct. The coalition web site is:
http://www.employersforqualityhealthcare.org/home/

Comments

I've only been around for 54 years, but in my experience your local chamber of commerce has always been as worthless as tits on a boar hog, the national chamber....worse than that. What most people don't know is that your chamber of commerce is a private business not connected to local or state government, so they do whatever they want and of course it's never in the interest of the working man. It's time to send all chambers of commerce back to the 19th century where they belong. If you've got their costly little plaque on your wall....quit today!


Hopefully, ALL Arkansas Times blog readers will realize that whether or not you support this CoC measure, you pay for it.

Most towns find themselves giving tax monies to their local CoC. Now you see what your local "CONTRIBUTIONS" to your local CoC gets you. How? It's thru that little hole in your pocket called sales tax which I've NEVER witnessed a CoC oppose cause they know they will get their share of it.

This is akin to making the child go fetch the belt with which he will be beaten.

All those bidnesses into which the state has funneled OUR money will be paying for this lobbying effort.

Enjoy your whippin y'all in this Land of Opportunity and at will employment.
.

...what DBI & eL said...

Never in my life did I think I would say this.. But

I agree with the CoC... Kill this bill!

It's a massive tax on mid and low income folks, with mandates to buy junk insurance, It's costly, with lots of paperwork... a burden on business and individuals.

A giant gift to big pharma and big insurance.

It's not about care.

Costs will continue to skyrocket.

Many millions of people will not have care... many millions will still face bankruptcy due to health issues.

We will still be in last place in terms of cost and care.

How can our state and local governments provide money to such a political organization? That should be against the law.

Most people I know on the local level have no idea that some of their local chamber money goes to the state chamber. Much less do they realize how political the State Chamber is and how it represents big corporations and not true small businesses. Most only see their local chamber as an organization to promote economic growth in their communities.

I think the press and others need to do a better job of informing local members what some of their money is going towards. Many local chamer members pay dues that end up opposing legislation that would be in their best interest.

Both the state and US Chamber of Commerce should change their name to Chamber of Corporations.

As a small business owner, I am not a member of my local chamber for this very reason. As long s the local chamber continues to pay money to the state chamber, I will have no choice but stay uninvolved in their organization. I suggest others do the same. If you are a member of your local chamber, ask if they are a member of the state or US chambers. Not all local chambers are and they do not have to be.

I should disclose that several local chambers are clients of mine. Obviously that does not change my opinion though.

Lately with 1) the exposure of its inflated membership claims; 2) correct prediction of its rationalization of membership claims; and 3) playing to the personal interest of its leadership; the CofC is looking more and more like a moderate popgun than serious problem for Blank and Markie-Mark.

Bad mistake by Randy Zook and the AR Chamber...if the local Chambers send this letter out, their membership will drop 50-60% next year. Local Chambers are foolish if they become involved in national political debates.

Yes, it IS painful to think you agree with the chamber, but the bill is a useless piece of shit, except of course, for big biz. It should be killed. Just remember that it is the fault of BOTH corporate parties. It's time for "the people" to take control.

Medicare for all -- support single payer!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Campaign climate
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Paul Barton

A paper published by a think tank last month warned that Sen. Blanche Lincoln's ascendancy to the Agriculture Committee chairmanship was a bad omen for passage of climate-change legislation in 2010 due to her close ties to agricultural producers and processors seen as major contributors of greenhouse gases. /more/

Nurturing fiction
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Last Wednesday, a column by Cathy Frye appeared in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette under the headline "Mothers in Haiti Face Living Nightmare." But Frye has never been to Haiti. /more/


Return of Count Ed
Date: 2/4/2010
By: Arkansas Times Staff

Dracula can't stop biting necks and Ed Bethune can't stop debasing Arkansas politics. Persistence is but one of the traits they share. /more/

Home / Blogs / This Week / Entertainment / Ark. News Headlines / Multimedia / Classifieds / Subscribe / Contact