Pressly murder trial continues UPDATED

TRIAL CONTINUES: Curtis Vance enters courthouse today.
The capital murder trial of Curtis Vance for the 2008 slaying of KATV anchor Anne Pressly continued this morning with testimony from Little Rock police detective J.C. White about a three-hour session with Vance after he was arrested Nov. 26.
The session wasn't recorded, but White testified to his recollection of the session, in which Vance gave a series of three evolving statements. The detective said Vance provided details that corresponded to evidence in the case.
Vance initially said he had nothing to do with the crime.
Then, in a second statement, he said he went to Pressly's home, but she wasn't there. He said he pried open a back door and stole a laptop. After being told his DNA had been found at the scene, he said that Pressly was there. He said he saw her lying naked in the bed with her dogs, but denied assaulting her.
In a third statement, Vance went further. He said he took a weapon, a wood-handled tool, into the house. He said he took a yellow purse and laptop outside to his car, then went back inside the house to take a credit card. He said he saw Pressly naked on the bed and took his penis out. The dogs began barking. That, he told the detective, awoke Pressly. She was startled and began fighting with him. He fought back. He said he feared she'd seen him. Vance later told White he'd thrown the tool into the Arkansas River as he drove to his brother's house in North Little Rock.
Vance said he left the house, drove to I-630 and then on to I-30, where he stopped at a Shell service station at Ninth Street, using Pressly's credit card to buy fuel. He said he backed up to leave the station because he didn't want to drive by a police car nearby. This was a detail that squared, the detective said, with a security camera video taken at the station.
Defense lawyer Katherine Streett asked why White didn't record the interview. White said he doesn't record statements initially because he doesn't want to have to start and stop tapes. He said Vance had also asked not to have the statement recorded.
Streett asked about inconsistencies in the statements, for example Vance saying he'd pried open the back door. No signs of forced entry were found. Also, Pressly, described as naked, was found with a T-shirt on. Vance also told White about throwing a purse in a neighbor's yard, but no purse was found, or anything else taken from the house.
Streett's questioning was aimed at showing that Vance could have known details about Pressly's house, car and injuries because of media reporting.
White said certain details were never mentioned to the press, including the missing laptop that Vance mentioned. But White acknowledged that police had provided some key details to Vance himself during the questioining, including the discovery of DNA evidence. It's a technique to let suspects know police know more than suspects might believe. He said, however, that Vance's description of a shed in the backyard of the house, the color of Pressly's car and the laptop were details not publicly known.
Later this morning, the jury will hear a tape-recorded statement Vance gave to police Dec. 10 after asking to meet with police while in the county jail.
UPDATE:
Before a break for lunch about
He said the three of them used socks from a pack of dirty clothes in his car as gloves. In this account, Vance took a stolen computer to his car, then encountered the two accomplices leaving the house saying, “we gotta go, we gotta go.” He learned later, he claimed, that one of the two had hit Pressly in the face with an iron pipe.
Detectives then asked how Vance's semen was found at the crime scene. He explained it came from using the sock for cleanup after he’d had oral sex some time previously with a prostitute.
During this statement, Vance claimed he was hit by an arresting officer in November. He also made a statement offering an alibi for the rape charge he faces in Marianna. He claimed the school teacher had been paying him to have sex and complained after he stopped. (She has said she couldn't identify her attacker.)
Police said one of the men identified as an accomplice by Vance was questioned by police, though not charged in the case. Defense lawyers brought out that a DNA sample taken from him wasn’t tested by the state Crime Lab.
A videotaped statement from Vance is expected after the lunch break. In it, Vance will exonerate his supposed accomplices.





Comments
Who is the scariest looking dude in this picture?
Posted by: Doc
|
November 9, 2009 11:45 AM
Now why would a suspect be questioned for 3 hours without a tape recorder running?
Those pigs were trying to confuse Vance and set him up for a contradiction.
I think we have another case of framing a guilty man. And were I on the jury, these pigs would learn the ill effects of such lawlessness.
Posted by: 70%er
|
November 9, 2009 12:25 PM
Did they show the gas station tape to the jury? Was the police car in the tape?
Posted by: OnlyinArkansas
|
November 9, 2009 01:09 PM
I wonder if thers any way humanly and legally possible for those 3 PDs, who dont have much experience as I recall, to get the judge to rule the gas station tape inadmissible?
Posted by: tina
|
November 9, 2009 01:21 PM
If they have solid DNA evidence, I guess Vance did the crime, however, when the assault was first reported, the brutality of the crime sounded like it was "personal" by a someone who knew her.
Posted by: HenryS
|
November 9, 2009 01:23 PM
Has the prosecution tried to admit the gas station tape?
Posted by: OnlyinArkansas
|
November 9, 2009 01:25 PM
70%er - anybody who calls a police person a "pig" sounds like someone who has run afoul of the law themselves.
Posted by: coda70
|
November 9, 2009 01:38 PM
coda - When I moved here, a friend said, "Be careful, they don't understand sarcasm down there."
Posted by: Doc
|
November 9, 2009 01:46 PM
"Pressly's semen"?
I won't address the other errors I saw, just "Pressly's semen."
Posted by: Crash Davis
|
November 9, 2009 01:55 PM
coda, how do you mean 'afoul'? Speeding ticket or jail time? Yes to the first, no to the second.
In the 90s I was an ardent supporter of the local police dept, since sometime this decade that support has turned to revulsion. It probably has much to do with the repeated Taser torture sessions I continually read about and the obvious lawbreaking by the law keepers.
No, I used pigs not because of some personal anger or sense of wrongdoing, but because more and more of our 'law keepers' are acting like the law they are sworn to uphold is their own personal property to do with as they see fit.
Posted by: 70%er
|
November 9, 2009 02:09 PM
Thanks, Crash, for the catch.
Posted by: maxb
|
November 9, 2009 02:30 PM
The testimony was that no DNA was found in the semen.
Posted by: OnlyinArkansas
|
November 9, 2009 04:05 PM
"The testimony was that no DNA was found in the semen."
This DNA stuff can get confusing and I often wonder how that affects a jury.
The way I understand it is there was no DNA detected by "nornal" procedures. The Y-STR DNA test can and did detect smaller amounts of DNA. However, this test is not as specific for that person so it could be from any male in Vance's lineage.
I think.
Posted by: GPR
|
November 9, 2009 05:33 PM
Psssst. Everybody on this blog knows that George W. did it. He was mysteriously "out of town" the night she was killed. Pass it on.
Posted by: Casimer Pulaski
|
November 9, 2009 05:54 PM
"And were I on the jury, these pigs would learn the ill effects of such lawlessness."
On behalf of the rest of Arkansas, let me say "Thank God you are not on the jury." I could wish that someone you love were Vance's next victim, but that would sink me to your level, and I don't want to go there. I haven't forgotten your expressed wish that Tim Russert suffered as he died.
Posted by: FromThePines
|
November 9, 2009 09:11 PM