Chesapeake: "For The Good of" WHO? (UPDATED)

Those "For the good of Arkansas" ads are really starting to cheese me off. A couple of weeks ago, I received a call from a friend, asking if I'd like to have her beautiful Ameraucana (the "Easter Egg Chicken") hens. It seems that Chesapeake set up camp on the lot next door, cut down all the trees, installed a drill, and much more. The constant noise, she said, was too upsetting for her much-loved birds, and she'd made the decision to let them go to a new home rather than continue to see them stressed out on a daily basis. She was in tears over the decision, but couldn't see any other humane option. She kept her more laid-back Orpington and other hens, who didn't seem as bothered by the 24/7 racket next door.
I was totally unprepared for the scene at my friend's home when I went to pick up the five hens. The first thing that hit me like a punch in the face was the NOISE. Dear God, the noise. I couldn't believe that noise like that could even be LEGAL in a residential neighborhood. It was deafening, and non-stop. We couldn't have a normal conversation, but had to shout at each other the entire time.
Moving around to the back yard, you find the defaced acreage next door. There's no escaping it, actually. Apparently, promises were made on the front end...promises of visual screening, noise-baffling, etc. Those promises were not kept. This picture was taken as I stood next to my friend's tidy, adorable chicken coop.


Up until Chesapeake showed up, this entire area was forested. Those few remaining trees mark the edge of the property line. In other words, the only reason those trees are still standing is that they are actually on my friend's property. Oh, and all those trees that were cut down? Were they at least harvested for building, or, heck, even for firewood? Of course not! They were burned on-site. Way to go, Chesapeake.

I just stared in disbelief at all the destruction, the ugliness. I couldn't believe the noise. I couldn't believe that this is even legal to do. Not the drilling, the deforestation, etc., but the depriving innocent people of the quiet enjoyment of their home--isn't that a right we all have? I mean, I live out in the country, BUT, if I started blasting a stereo a full volume non-stop around the clock, wouldn't the sheriff come out and make me STOP, on behalf of my neighbors? Of course he would--and SHOULD.
The owners of the property where the drilling is taking place are being compensated financially, of course. But what of the poor innocents who own, and live on, the adjoining property? They don't have the right to a minute's peace, or any compensation for the loss of food-producing livestock, or just the simple ability to live a NORMAL life for the duration of Chesapeake's involvement in the area? I truly don't get it, and wish someone would explain to me HOW this is, in any way, right...or even legal. I thought there were protections in place in America against things like this. I really did. What a fool I was.
My friend is a nervous wreck from the constant stress of the noise, and has had to deal with prowlers peering in her windows since Chesapeake's (or whoever they subcontracted to) employees took up residence in mobile homes on the job site. I feel terrible for her, and helpless. I want to DO something more than just provide a peaceful home for her birds...but at least I was able to do that. Five lovely hens came home with me that day, and seem to have adjusted nicely at our place, where it is blissfully quiet...at least until a utility company comes to MY neighborhood.

A SAD UPDATE: Since my visit, the living conditions at my friend's home have worsened exponentially. I'm forwarding the details, along with the name of the contact person from Chesapeake who has been backpedaling on his promises to the residents of this area, to Max, in hopes that he'll know what questions to ask and who to ask them of, and at least maybe shine a light on the REALITY of what happens to your life when Chesapeake moves into your neighborhood.

I'm updating just to add these pictures of what the view from the backyard was like BC (Before Chesapeake).










Comments
This is really unfortunate. Chesapeake has taken far too much advantage of the neighbors in the area--and that is just to start.
I would be extremely unhappy if that scene moved in next door to me. Your poor friend has a right to be upset and Chesapeake needs to start compensating people who are being affected by their actions. Pronto.
Posted by: sleepingmommy
|
August 2, 2008 07:35 PM
Noise shmoise, what they can't drop a few hundred bucks on some noise cancelling headphones? And those trees? It's not like they were doing anything productive, they aren't bringing big bucks to conglomerates. It's not like we need them to breathe or anything, geez.
Seriously, I'm so sorry for your friend. That's just horrible and ugly. And I cannot believe they just burned that wood. If that company put promises in writing, and is breaking them, it's high time to take them to court.
Posted by: Sheryl
|
August 2, 2008 08:23 PM
This is absolutely horrifying. I was born and raised in Arkansas (moved to Tennessee 30 years ago) and this looks like the rape and pillage Weyerhaeuser inflicted all around Garland County years ago. The land still shows scars from that time, and from the look of these photographs, it will take decades for this area to 'recover' as well, if ever. What a crude, primitive, dishonestly short-sighted way to do business. Come on, Arkansas, you're better than this.
Posted by: Babybloomr
|
August 2, 2008 10:08 PM
I don't understand why they need to destroy so much area?
Nice of you to take the chickens. Did you already have a coop? I've been thinking about raising chickens myself. Haven't been around it in so long.. it would be like starting from scratch. (oh, what the heck, pun intended). And I really don't now how long a rooster would live around me...making the noise so early in the mornings.
Thanks for sharing this story. I live north of it all right now, so it's good to hear from folks about it.
Posted by: Eureka Springs, AR
|
August 2, 2008 10:25 PM
Wow.
I think I would end up killing someone if that happened next door to me.
Posted by: Any*Mouse
|
August 2, 2008 11:49 PM
Geez. There's got to be something that can be done about the noise.
My heart goes out to your friends and her neighbors.
Posted by: GeekMommy
|
August 3, 2008 02:35 AM
Several other states already have experienced the onslaught of destuctive gas drilling. One study showed that, over a 20-year period, the cost of the damage to land was greater than the earnings by landowners. Check the Oil and Gas Accountability Project webpage for tons of info, including a model contract to protect landowners on the front end. New Mexico experienced so much damage that the legislature last year enacted a landowner protectin act.
Last I knew, ADEQ had only 15 inspectors statewide for this and many other types of inspections. Ask the Governor how much is in next year's budget to greatly increase the number of inspectors, because it doesn't matter what the regulations say if there is no one to inspect. Arkansas should require an on-site inspection prior to drilling, after drilling is finished, and at random times in between. Right now they just come out if someone complains.
Oh, and if this is happening near you, make a record and take pictures BEFORE drilling starts, if possible, including: check the production and quality of your well water. When people notice water problems and finallly pay to get their water tested, the drillers just say there is no way to prove it.
Posted by: lemthree
|
August 3, 2008 09:31 AM
Sorry to say, I am the unlucky person who's home and property is the one you are looking at that Chesepeake destroyed. The noise, the water canon's going off every hour or two, the sleep deprivation , the huge bright lights on that turn darkness into daylight, the dirt and dust and stink is misery at it's worst. Get it all in writing? Ha--- you are funny, this is big business here and you get NOTHING in writing . What you do get is a lot of head nods and yes sirs and yes ma'ams and everthing you want to hear , then you find out that they lied about everything they can, because you do not own the land they are sitting on and ruining everyone's lives for the next 4 months. Searcys mayor Belinda LaForce is running the programs on the tv obout The Shale and how this is the best thing to happen to Searcy and how much revunue it will generate and all the jobs it will bring -- yata -yata-yata. I would like to personally invite the mayor to come and spend 24 hours cooped up in my home listening and living with all the chaos and the water canons, and generators running at full speed at 3:00 in the morning and the lights that look like an space ship has landed in my back yard, and see how she fairs . Come on Mayor, come spend the afternoon with us on my back deck and have a glass of tea with us and see what your progress is doing to the little person,, I dare you!
Posted by: thomsmom01
|
August 3, 2008 11:36 AM
This is a terrible example of the issues arising with eminent domain. The Colorado legislature is dealing with it here, and there have been bad examples all over the U.S. of misuse of government management of property. Your friend may want to contact her state legislator and see if she can file a complaint. While they may not have many rights because the development is going on next door, they should be able to claim disruption and lack of enjoyment of personal property due to the lack of barriers being erected.
The destruction of the forest is so unfortunate, and I'm sure there could have been a way (probably more expensive) to handle the development without as much destruction.
There may also be an attorney willing to file a complaint on a contingency basis. I'm sure the power company has some pretty deep pockets...
Posted by: Gretchen-LifeStyle Denver
|
August 3, 2008 02:45 PM
Blame Beebe!! He COULD have done something about this, now the horse has escaped for hundreds of folks, not to mention the UNKNOWN consequences for the ground and surface water, roads... He said on AETN several months ago, in response to a Governor's School question: "Our responsible agencies are ensuring that all of our environmental protections are being complied with."
FIRST and foremost, we don't HAVE any "environmental protections" with any teeth/accountability/consequences!! Then there was some grant money or something supposedly available to ANRC/ADEQ/Oil & Gas to hire "best practice" inspectors (at least one for each county). The KEY to this lie was it was supposedly "independent" from the Gov or Ledge control/involvement.
Never happened. My take on that - the agencies "blinked" in the face of drilling industry political pressure.
The history of these "protect the environment" agencies is one of same-old SAME OLD "bidness" rules: Patronage, nepotism, political connections, conferences world-wide and other perks. Upholding their missions? Not so much... In a word, they SUCK! This sad example is the tip of the iceberg and NO ONE in state government who should be accountable actually IS accountable. Just the cost of doing "bidness." Pathetic.
Posted by: Larry
|
August 3, 2008 05:30 PM
To answer Eureka's question--yes, we have in the neighborhood of 75 or so chickens (no FrankenBroilers, just "real" chickens), and a baker's dozen Narragansett turkeys. And heck yeah, you should get some chooks! You don't have to have a rooster at all; in fact, you'll get better egg production without one. There are TONS of good breeders of poultry in your area, plus you're near several hatcheries. Chickens are fun!
Posted by: Belinda
|
August 3, 2008 09:49 PM
Our neighbors did some logging on their land a few years ago, which was bad enough. They didn't clear cut, and stopped at dusk, so it was quiet at night.
THIS, on the other hand, sounds like a nightmare! To suddenly live next to a 24/7 constant barrage of noise and light is the same as torture. You should be compensated so you can either move or put in some sound proofing.
Makes me think of the places in Texas that had the gas flares going all the time near the oil wells. Those residents ended up having to move out, it was no obnoxious.
Posted by: rablib
|
August 4, 2008 08:13 AM
SO obnoxious, not no obnoxious.
Posted by: rablib
|
August 4, 2008 08:14 AM
So much for:
"Chesapeake's operations are built around a commitment to safeguard the environment...We strive to make efficient use of resources to minimize our environmental footprint and to conserve habitat diversity and the plant and animal populations that may be affected by our operations." (From Chesapeake's website)
Since when was cutting down trees and BURNING them "efficient use of resources" and an attempt to "conserve habitat diversity". And what about the human populations affected by their operations?
Ugh! While I know we need domestic sources of energy, what about taking their responsibility to the environment AND the people seriously, too?
Posted by: smtwngrl
|
August 4, 2008 11:18 AM
Right you are--the walk doesn't quite match the talk, does it?
Posted by: Belinda
|
August 4, 2008 03:36 PM
This is just downright disgusting. I feel so badly for your friend and her family. I wish there was something I could do.
THIS is what your energy costs, people. It is NOT free, and NOT without environmental and social consequences. This post effectively communicates all of the OTHER costs associated with our dependence on oil and gas.
Posted by: Pupsicle
|
August 4, 2008 11:46 PM
What can I say that hasn't been said, other than, I love you bloggers, but the fierceness you leave here does nothing, well, it does make Ninjapoodle feel like she's getting in touch with her audience, but it won't help to keep these natural gas companies in check.
You are going to have to contact the governor's office, your state reps, etc. and light a fire under their butts. I don't think the gas boom is all bad, but I think these companies could do with a little more common sense and courtesy rather than doing whatever they want and buying a wheel chair van for the senior center and calling it even Stevens.
If you don't make it an issue for your rep's reelection, etc., it won't be one, especially with whatever perks and donations these companies are making.
TBW
Posted by: TBW
|
August 18, 2008 01:43 PM
Update on oil shale issues: Just FYI, there was a meeting on Thurs. Sept 18 in LR of the AR Game & Fish Comm. Oversight Committee (whose job is to encourage revenue generation for the AGFC) with the oil and gas industries feeding AGFC's heads with visions of sugarplums and all sorts of benefits of drilling on our state lands.
Keep contacting your state legislators and the governor and continue to let them know that true costs of shale drilling are greater than the benefits for all of us - as both public and private citizens.
And thanks again to TBW for posting/blogging about this issue.
Posted by: ARMediaReformer
|
September 18, 2008 04:06 PM