Maybe the Guy with the Mysterious Scratches and No Alibi Did It | A Chick Called Mick

Friday, March 27, 2009

Maybe the Guy with the Mysterious Scratches and No Alibi Did It

Posted By on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:40 PM

I just finished an online class, so I've been giving my brain a much needed break.  I picked up a stack of mysteries from work, and I've been making my way through those. 

When I want something light, I read "cozy mysteries," which are mysteries that frequently feature some sort of theme (coffee mysteries, Sudoku mysteries, gardening mysteries.  One day we'll talk about the absurd number of hobbies and professions that have been the basis for a mystery series) and usually have titles that are puns on the chosen theme.  In these books, somehow the dead people are almost never the point.  Murder is mostly a puzzle to solve.  I also only read mysteries written by women.  I’ve made a few exceptions, but the last one I read is a pretty good example of why I tend to avoid the male authors.

It was a standup comedy mystery written by a guy who is a professional comedian.  It was a weird mix of cozy mystery and attempts at noir.  There were basically two women in the story, a sexy redhead and a sexier desert goddess.  Both women slept with our hero—a brawling, Irish comic—but other than that, they didn’t DO anything.  One of them actually orchestrated the murders, but she outsourced all the actual work of putting her schemes into action.  *Sigh.*

So, I read books written by women because the chicks are always in the middle of the action. That doesn’t guarantee that I’ll like them, though.  When I found a book called Ninja Soccer Moms, I didn’t have high expectations, but I read a few pages on Google books out of curiosity.  I forced myself to read until our heroine got her shirt caught in a paper shredder, but that right there is a deal breaker.  I’m pretty sure that’s neither funny nor possible.

I like Diane Mott Davidson’s culinary mysteries, so when I finished all of those, I tried another one: Cherry Cheesecake Murder by Joanne Fluke.  In a small Minnesota town, Hannah, has a mother who constantly compares her to her perfect sister and a cat with tons of personality.  Everyone loves Hannah and constantly praises her for being so clever.  Two men are in love with her and fight over her in a nice, Midwestern way.  When they both propose to her, she deliberates before realizing that she’s not ready to get married (even though, she’s *horror* in her 30s) and tells the men she’d like to keep dating them both.  Then, they all meet up at a diner for pancakes.  Seriously.

I figured out who the killer well before the rest of the characters did.  Then, about 50 pages before the answer is revealed, the whole town seems to be struck by some sort of brain disease that makes them unable to spot the obvious. (I can’t remember specifics, typical logic might be this: “Why, he can’t have been seen kissing Mindy.  He’s married to Sarah!”).  So, if the killer’s identity wasn’t obvious before, it becomes clear by how hard everyone is feebly rationalizing that it can’t be that person.  He was always quiet and kept to himself.  He seemed so nice!  That book was so horrible that I can’t believe I read another one in the series.  Shame on me, I guess.

I just finished a dead-end job mystery, where it seems the heroine does a series of menial jobs for cash under the table in south Florida because she’s on the run from her ex-husband.  In this one, she’s a hotel maid.  The writing was a little heavy handed, and I knew when a detail was important because the narrator, Helen, would notice it, think about how it was odd, and then it would be dismissed as probably nothing.  Definitely not a clue!

Bear with me for just a bit of back story.  Helen is dating a perfect, wonderful, loving, faithful man.  Her ex-husband—who sponged off his wife and had affairs for years—has come into town, looking for her.  To distract the ex, Helen’s landlady fixed him up with a rich older lady because, naturally, after meeting once, they will fall in love and get married (which they do, in, like, a week).  When Helen and her new man, Phil, spy on her ex and his new lady friend, Phil recognizes the woman as a known black widow.  He actually says she’s THE black widow as if there’s only ever been one, adding that she’s a notorious serial killer.

Helen doesn’t quite get it.  “Who did she kill?” she asks.  That’s when I started noting the book’s crimes against me as a reader.  Phil tells her the lady kills her spouses, and the chapter ends on that line as though there should be accompanying dun-dun-DUN music playing at that shocking revelation.

Other problems: altering a common phrase such that I read it twice before I recognized it.  Also, this: “she wasn’t going to rub salt into her friend’s bruised heart.”  Did this book have an editor and did that person know mixing metaphors is bad?  In the end, there was one murder that wasn’t committed by the main, evil killer but by a woman who is terribly good and sweet (outside of breaking a guy’s face with a whiskey bottle).  Sure, she killed the man, but he was really mean and evil and wronged her and, of course, blurted out the most horrible thing he could say in order to justify her killing him.  Helen and the nice killer conspire to frame the other, bad guy killer since he’s dead now and did I mention he was really bad and the woman really, really sweet?  Helen justifies letting her friend get away with murder (and $100,000 in cash) by saying the guy she killed was probably a terrible husband who was abusive to his wife, and the whole family was probably better off with him dead.  Yeah.  Meanwhile, her ex-husband married the black widow.  In fairness, she tried to prevent the wedding, but couldn’t and after a brief period of feeling guilty, she decides that this situation, too, will probably work out for the best somehow in the end.  Dude.  I get that these people aren’t real, but I am uncomfortable with the logic at work in all of that.

Why don’t I just quit reading a book when I realize I don’t like it?  I can’t.  I have trouble not finishing books and movies.  I still have a bookmark in Bleak House from where I put it down in 2003 so that I can pick up where I left off one day. I need to believe that I will finish it eventually or else I'd never have allowed myself to read a new book until I'd finished it.  As for just skipping to the end of a bad mystery, forget it.  I'm too curious, and I would always wonder what I'd missed.

The truth is, I also find it cathartic occasionally to read a terrible book.  It makes me so angry, and I get fired up and rant about it to friends and occasionally toss it aside in disgust.  It’s an outlet for emotions I don’t often get to display in polite society.  I can get as mad as I want and yell at characters when they act like idiots.  I can channel everyday frustrations into venting about clumsy phrasing or poor characterizations, and when I finish, I can close the cover and return it.  It’s a little like therapy mixed with anger management, and because I use my local library, it’s completely free.  Generally, I think it’s better to read good books, but every once in a while, nothing beats a really awful read.

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Ashley McKelvy

  • Can I have a Definition please?

    I meant to write this post days ago, but it's been one of those weeks where I just couldn't convince myself to do the things I should.  But I wanted to talk for just a minute about the Scripps-Howard Spelling Bee that was on TV this week.  The first thing I want to say is that I am an abysmal speller (and don't think I didn't get a little help on the spelling of 'abysmal.')*  When I lived in Austin, I applied for some jobs with UT, and they required a spelling test.  I took the test twice and never scored high enough to apply for a secretarial position with the school.  So, I was never a viable spelling bee candidate.  But there's a documentary about students participating in the National Spelling Bee called Spellbound that I am in love with.  I'm actually watching it as I type this.
    • May 31, 2009
  • Grillin' time

    My parents called this morning and wanted to come up for a few hours to spend Memorial Day with me.  It was a nice surprise--although if I'd had a little more notice I would have vacuumed, but dirty carpet is what they get for giving me little advanced warning--because my parents are kind of awesome.Mom mentioned that they'd thought we might cook out, but since it was rainy and I don't own a grill, I didn't give much credence to that idea.  I was surprised, then, when my parents came up to my place carrying bags of groceries and a grill in a box.  A tiny grill.  One might even go so far as to call it cute, but the punishment for undermining the grill might mean one doesn't get to partake in the delicious charbroiled food cooked upon it.  So, I didn't call it cute.I let them in, and since it was close to lunchtime, Dad started prepping the food while Mom and I sat on the couch and got caught up on the latest news.  It took me a while to realize we weren't having hamburgers.  Or hot dogs.  We were having kabobs.Generally speaking, there's nothing wrong with kabobs, it's just that it wasn't what I was expecting.  He got this idea and wanted to try it out, and that's the sometimes weird but often wonderful thing about my dad.  He and my mother live in the small town where I grew up, and I sometimes used to joke that it was a town that almost forcibly resists culture.  But sometimes major trends and fads make it all the way to our little corner of the state, and people like my dad find out about them.  Five years after I tried my first mojito, he heard about the drink and decided he'd like to try one.  He grew his own mint for the mojitos, and the thing you should know is that my father is a much better gardener than he is a bartender.  We had an abundance of mint, and the result was that he became very generous with it in order to prevent waste.  The first time he handed me a glass, I stared at the veritable forest floating amidst the liquid ingredients."Next, time, I don't want a salad at the bottom of my drink," I teased him.When the mint started to overrun the place, he put it in the iced tea as well, and insisted on calling it "mohi-tea."  Because while he is often a really, truly funny man, my father sometimes cannot resist the siren call of a cheesy joke.I like the fact that my father is curious and willing to try new things.  Sure, I wasn't thrilled when he commandeered a bottle of my wine to try his hand at French cooking, and we have actually had an argument about what truly makes a sandwich a panini, but generally I think it's an admirable quality.  It's one that I think I've inherited in small ways--I prefer to sample pop culture more than food, but I can be persuaded to try a new drink now and again.  The kabobs were good, even the slices of grilled pineapple that I pooh-poohed early on turned out to be delicious, and I was glad Dad decided to try something different.  I did have hot dogs for dinner, though.  You know, just to be patriotic and all.
    • May 25, 2009
  • Out With The Old? Not So Fast

    I am off today, and I am sitting at home in what, sadly, might be my favorite pair of jeans.  I say "sadly" because after close to five years of denim-y good times, they need to be retired.  They were a gift from someone who couldn't wear them for some reason, but they fit me perfectly.
    • May 22, 2009
  • More »

Most Shared

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation