Subsidizing retailers | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, June 4, 2006

Subsidizing retailers

Posted By on Sun, Jun 4, 2006 at 8:03 AM

The Jonesboro Sun editorial page today has a good review of a study out of UALR last week on retail sales in Arkansas. It said that six counties account for half the retail sales in the state, with Pulaski County well in the lead (please note NWA chauvinists, that Pulaski has far more than the combined sales in Washington and Benton counties). Garland, Sebastian and Craighead are the other biggies.

The Sun is happy about Craighead, naturally, and hopeful that Bruce Burrow's new taxpayer-subsidized mall will increase the county's clout still more. Undoubtedly it will and the tax revenue will be god good for Jonesboro. But .... that money is not new money. It's retail spending siphoned off from somewhere else, to the detriment of the areas that lose it. That's not illegal. It's capitalism at work. But there is no reason that state taxpayers should subsidize it. There's no reason Eudora should pay for the transfer of underwear purchases from Turrell to Bruce Burrow's mall.

We couldn't believe it when a lawyer popped up at the UALR session to say that what this state needs is more incentives to build retail shopping centers. The incentive is the market. Let it work. Why should state taxpayers help Bruce Burrow pull customers in North Little Rock away from next-door Sherwood? The gain in NLR revenue will be but a veil for the loss somewhere else. There is a finite market for underwear. You don't create more by shifting where it is sold.

(We don't know about you, but we buy socks on the Internet. Now there is a subsidy -- digital shopping is tax-free in many cases -- that also deserves some attention.)

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Latest Obamacare repeal proposal even worse for women

    The Graham-Cassidy bill to undo the Affordable Care Act will be devastating in Arkansas — an overall reduction in Medicaid spending by billions and  a pathway to gutting of premium protection for people already sick are certain to dramatically reduce access to health coverage. But wait. There's more bad news.
    • Sep 19, 2017
  • Trump rejects findings on net benefit of immigration

    The Trump administration has rejected a study that concludes immigrants produce more through taxes and labor than they cost the federal government. To do so, it had to jigger with the study.
    • Sep 19, 2017
  • Sierra Club touts benefits of solar power

    The Sierra Club in Arkansas says the state Public Service Commission should not change rules in a way that could discourage people who use solar power for electricity.
    • Sep 18, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • In Little Rock, Marco Rubio sells American exceptionalism

    This is Rubio's axiomatic answer to Donald Trump's insistence that he and he alone will Make America Great Again: America is the greatest, always has been.
    • Feb 22, 2016
  • UPDATE: Hutchinson moves to cover himself on cut to War Memorial Stadium

    Gov. Asa Hutchinson apparently felt the burn from KARK's exclusive Tuesday night on his plans to cut state support of War Memorial Stadium in half beginning July 1, 2018. He has a so-far secret plan to make the stadium self-sustaining. We bet that doesn't include state support.
    • Oct 20, 2016
  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation