Prying on the Prairie | Arkansas Blog

Friday, July 21, 2006

Prying on the Prairie

Posted By on Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 3:46 PM

The Grand Prairie irrigation boondoggle is finally getting some closer inspection from legislators. A citizen blogger files this report.

The Legislative Council voted today to require an independent review of the current cost estimate for this project.  As you know, Soil and Water has been using a 1995 estimate in describing this as a $319 million project.  Also, it admitted today that it doesn't know how much the project will actually cost and thus the amount that farmers eventually are charged for this water could increase beyond the $26 per acre foot that the first group of contracts was based on.  About 20 percent of the farmers have contracts for $26 per acre foot and there seemed to be a consensus that this price will probably be low.  If it is, either the remaining 80 percent will be forced to pay more for the water (How much no one knows) or the taxpayers will pay the difference. 

The state match is financed with general obligation bonds and if the farmers don't pay, the taxpayers are on the hook.  Percy Malone made a good point that Soil and Water usually won't finance a project unless you have a sufficient number of customers agreeing to participate to assure repayment.  Here, they don't have but 20 percent signed up, yet they have committed a large amount of state money to this project.  In the meantime, they don't have enough bonding authority for other water and sewer projects because they've committed so much to irrigation projects.
There was some discussion about other alternatives to this big ditch and dam approach (get International Paper out of the Sparta, add more on-farm conservation, buy farm land to take it out of production thus reducing demand for water etc.).  All of these could potentially reduce withdrawal rates from the aquifers to a safe yield level.  Someone said that the project as proposed would cost around $2,000 per acre to build.  For that kind of money, you could just buy the land and set it aside for recreation.

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • The two cities of Little Rock: East/west, black/white

    The Little Rock City Board illustrated this week a community divided over public schools, another blow to the Little Rock School District and another illustration of the need for ward elections to the board.
    • Mar 23, 2017
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation