Sewer impact | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Sewer impact

Posted By on Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 1:03 PM

Clayton Johnson, president of the Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods, delivered a message to the Little Rock Board of Directors yesterday that's worth reading. It's about thinking of impact fees -- not just citywide, large sewer rate increases -- to help pay for new sewage treatment plants to serve areas yet to be developed in Little Rock. (The city board has delayed a vote on the latest rate increase.)

His statement is on the jump.

LETTER TO CITY BOARD

The proposed sewer rate increase on tonight’s agenda has been discussed publicly for months and in some arenas for years.  The Coalition realizes the need to maintain the system of wastewater collection and treatment.  We also realize that the federal court has mandated many improvements to our city’s sewer system to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and protect the public’s health.  Therefore, the Coalition is in agreement with you that these improvements are needed.

However, what is not being discussed tonight is the forward-looking planning that must begin with the construction of the new treatment plant in the Little Maumelle basin.  This treatment plant is to be built in phases and the first 25 percent, a four million-gallon/day facility, is part of tonight’s rate increase.  This phase, and the three following phases will bring high quality sewer service to tens of thousands of acres in western Pulaski County.  Yet, on the other hand, by giving sewer treatment service to the Little Maumelle Basin, your decision tonight lays the foundation for decades of new development. It will, in fact, make possible the building of another city, in western Pulaski County, equal to the population Little Rock today.

The question that the Coalition pleads be put on your agenda is how future sewer service is to be financed by development in the long term.  Tonight you are choosing to make every ratepayer in Little Rock share equally in the cost of a treatment plant that only serves about 25,000 existing homes.  Tens of thousands more homes and other development will emerge over future decades and will be served by this treatment plant in western Pulaski County.  Will sewer users in east, central and southwest Little Rock be continually asked to pay higher sewer rates as the treatment plant is expanded?

Thus, it has become clear to the Coalition that now is the time to seriously study and implement impact fees for the partial financing of sewer treatment in the Little Maumelle Basin.  Only half of this first phase will serve existing sewer customers.  The treatment
plant’s other half, costing millions, will serve yet-to-be-identified users.  Especially in the case of a public utility, such as sewage treatment where the service is easily measurable and each customer’s use determined, the cost of present and future service needs should be financed by users whenever and wherever possible.

We are, therefore, asking that your 2007 budget should include a feasibility study by engineers and accountants to stimulate adoption of an impact fee schedule for sewer treatment in the Little Maumelle Basin.  This approach is clearly feasible based on the
practice of other Arkansas cities; it is both a financially sound and fiscally responsible method to finance such infrastructure needs and is also fair to the other sewer users in Little Rock.

Therefore, the coalition is requesting tonight that you please include an amount in your 2007 budget to fairly apply sewer charges in Little Rock by ordering the expert development of an impact fee structure for sewer treatment in the Little Maumelle Basin?

Clayton Johnson

Coalition President

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016
  • Hospitality, restaurant groups oppose bathroom bill

    Add the restaurant and hospitality association to those opposed to Sen. Linda Collins-Smith's bill to keep transgender people out of public restrooms that match their gender identity.
    • Mar 16, 2017
  • Kenneth Starr: A comment from Betsey Wright

    Betsey Wright, former President Bill Clinton's chief of staff when he was Arkansas governor, responds bitterly to a New York Times article today quoting Whitewater Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's warm words about Clinton. She can't forget the lives Starr ruined in Arkansas.
    • May 24, 2016

Most Shared

  • Conflicts of interest in the legislatures

    The Center for Public Integrity and the Associated Press collaborated for a project aimed at highlighting state legislators whose lawmaking might be affected by private business interests.
  • Industrial hemp pilot program coming soon to Arkansas

    One of the booths at this week's Ark-La-Tex Medical Cannabis Expo was hosted by the Arkansas Hemp Association, a trade group founded to promote and expand non-intoxicating industrial hemp as an agricultural crop in the state. AHA Vice President Jeremy Fisher said the first licenses to grow experimental plots of hemp in the state should be issued by the Arkansas State Plant Board next spring.
  • Cats and dogs

    I've always been leery of people who dislike animals. To my wife and me, a house without dog hair in the corners and a cat perched on the windowsill is as barren as a highway rest stop. We're down to three dogs and two cats, the smallest menagerie we've had for years.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation