Son of the P.R. fund | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Son of the P.R. fund

Posted By on Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 2:30 PM

When voters approved Amendment 70 to increase elected officials' pay, the amendment made it clear that extra payments would not be allowed and the campaign for the amendment made it clear that it would be end of public relations funds and other subterfuges to increase pay for elected officials without technically increasing their pay.

Well, the political class is restless. A bill floating around this session was amended this week, which indicates it is still very much alive. HB 2435 by Rep. Bruce Maloch originally set up a multi-part housing allowance for constitutional offices and judges on statewide courts. Now the bill has been amended to remove judges and to provide a single housing allowance, up to $12,000, for constitutional officers. Maloch says this is necessary to make the offices attractive to people statewide. Funny, last time I looked, most of the constitutional officers were from outside Little Rock -- Searcy, Jonesboro, Newport, etc.

Maloch's reasoning is that since the IRS doesn't deem a housing allowance income if it doesn't exceed the housing expense, extending a housing allowance wouldn't be considered income to Arkansas office holders. From a federal tax standpoint, perhaps. But it would break ranks violently with voters on the Constitutional amendment approved by voters. And, after housing allowances, why not meal allowances. And food allowances. And utility allowances. And gasoline allowances. Etc. Any average citizen knows well that extra money -- particularly untaxed extra money -- is additional income.

This argument doesn't fly with me, though it likely will fly high with legislators, ever hopeful of moving to higher office and ever hopeful of passing their own schemes for enhancing income. It might be time for a little legal action, in fact, on the ever fatter expense allowances that legislators are drawing. I've got a kewpie doll for anyone who thinks every legislator can justify all the money he or she draws with receipts for actual expenses.

From Amendment 70: "No officials of the executive department shall be reimbursed by the state of Arkansas for any expenses except those reasonably connected to their official duties and only if such documented expense is actually incurred and from the regular budget appropriated for the officials' office."

 

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Kenneth Starr: A comment from Betsey Wright

    Betsey Wright, former President Bill Clinton's chief of staff when he was Arkansas governor, responds bitterly to a New York Times article today quoting Whitewater Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's warm words about Clinton. She can't forget the lives Starr ruined in Arkansas.
    • May 24, 2016
  • Sabin's subterfuge in the race for mayor has roots in rigged city government

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports that an ethics complaint has been filed saying that the exploratory committee Rep. Warwick Sabin created to prepare for a run for Little Rock mayor was a subterfuge to avoid the city ordinance that doesn't allow campaign fundraising to begin until five months before the November 2018 election.Of course it is.
    • Aug 10, 2017
  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation