Coming: Social Security number debate | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Coming: Social Security number debate

Posted By on Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:20 PM

The Quorum Court last night discussed a complaint from a citizen who's discovered that some -- though by no means all -- real estate records added to the Internet by the Pulaski clerk's office sometimes contain Social Security numbers, typically on the older documents, but not always then.

Contrary to the complainant's belief, this is not illegal. Clerk Pat O'Brien is taking the proper stance in moving to put as much of the PUBLIC RECORD on-line as he can. Court rules in Arkansas have, for years, required attorneys not to include Social Security numbers in court pleadings, but real estate documents (deeds, mortgages, etc.) do not fall under that rule. And it appears that the numbers stopped appearing on real estate documents years ago. So the question: Do you take all real estate records off-line because some might have Social Security numbers? (I've owned five houses in Little Rock over the years since 1976. The records that are still on-line for me contain no S.S. numbers, just by way of example.)

O'Brien doesn't want to remove the records in toto and I think he's right. He says he will white out and replace records with S.S. numbers for those who ask. And he's purchased software that will automatically delete the numbers when paper files are digitized for on-line storage. It will take some time to cleanse past records already on-line. That seems like a sensible approach to me. The hunt for numbers is something akin to a needle-in-a-haystack search. Of course, thanks to the complaint, which will be the subject of news articles this week, a lot more people will know about the potential for finding numbers there. But ease of access to public records weighs in favor of O'Brien's approach.

This issue has arisen elsewhere. Here's an older Washington Post article on the subject, from January.


Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • ADEQ denies C&H Hog Farm permit

    The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has denied a new permit for the C&H Hog Farms' concentrated animal feeding operation near Mount Judea (Newton County). This is a big and somewhat surprising victory for critics who have viewed C&H's large-scale pig farm and the pig waste it generates as an existential threat to the Buffalo National River.
    • Jan 10, 2018
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation