A black eye for UCA UPDATE | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

A black eye for UCA UPDATE

Posted By on Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:54 AM

The Democrat-Gazette's underappreciated and hard-working Conway bureau reporter, Debra Hale-Shelton, had a fine story in this morning's paper.

Shenanigans concerning a stepped-up financial bonus for Lu Hardin, UCA's president.

It seems that the UCA Board of Trustees voted to speed up a $300,000 longevity bonus plan -- originally payable over five years -- to payable in less than three years. They just never bothered to tell anyone. No wonder. The big payout had some political downsides in a year when the UCA faculty isn't getting additional dough.

Here's where old-fashioned, value-free reporting has drawbacks. It would have been nice -- and it must have been tempting to the reporter -- to insert a number of "wink, winks"; "arch eyebrow here" or an interjection like "Right!"

As when trustee Rush Harding said the failure to vote on the matter in public was an oversight. As when it was said failure to include the action in minutes was innocent. As when Lu Hardin said he meant to mislead no one when he answered reporters' earlier questions about a pay raise in the negative. (See, he didn't get a pay raise, he got a "bonus." Wink. Wink. Nudge. Arch eyebrow.)

It's real simple. If a Board vote is required to pay Hardin this money, it should have been on the Board's agenda and a specific vote on the matter should have been taken in public session. It matters not if the bonus is drawn from private money (presumably a separate but related UCA nonprofit -- the story didn't say.) If the Board has control over expenditure of the money, it is effectively public money. If it is paid through UCA offices, even if only the cutting of the check and any deductions, it is public money.


UPDATE: This story is going to get worse before it gets better. Turns out a variety of reporters asked Hardin about this bonus for several weeks before he finally came clean this week. One of them was John Brummett. Unless I miss my guess, we'll hear more from him on the subject tomorrow.

Hardin clearly was disingenuous -- with good reason. He got a massive pay bump the same day the board raised tuition and froze faculty pay.

This sounds like:

1) A violation of the FOI law -- action taken in private that was not ratified in public.

2) An illegal exaction of taxpayer money. Hardin was paid $180,000 illegally if the action wasn't legally ratified in a public meeting. They can hold an open vote now, but they can't retroactively clean up an improper payment. Gene Sayre, where are you? 

Many questions remain about the source of the money; who has authority for spending that money, if the source is the UCA Foundation, and what role publicly paid employees played in the handling of the money.

Also, who was responsible for stirring the rumor that Lu Hardin might be in line to head the UA System and thus might need an incentive to stick around. Surely it wouldn't have been Hardin himself.



Comments (33)

Showing 1-33 of 33

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-33 of 33

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Legislative pay commission sets meeting

    The Independent Citizens Commission that sets pay for state officials, including the legislature, will meet Sept. 11. Will they give lawmakers more money?
    • Aug 17, 2018
  • State close to hiring marijuana permit consultant UPDATE

    40/29 reports that the state is close to hiring a consultant to help evaluate 203 applications for the 32 permits to be awarded to dispense medical marijuana.
    • Aug 16, 2018
  • The saga of Rusty Cranford

    Don't miss David Ramsey's telling of the Rusty Cranford story and the Arkansas public corruption scandal in which he's a central figure. It is far from over, but this also gives you some personal insight to a man in the middle of the action.
    • Aug 16, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • ADEQ denies C&H Hog Farm permit

    The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has denied a new permit for the C&H Hog Farms' concentrated animal feeding operation near Mount Judea (Newton County). This is a big and somewhat surprising victory for critics who have viewed C&H's large-scale pig farm and the pig waste it generates as an existential threat to the Buffalo National River.
    • Jan 10, 2018
  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017

Most Viewed

  • Satanic Temple arrives supported by Arkansas Christians; Rapert vows to defend 'will of the people'

    The Satanic Temple is bringing its 8.5-foot Baphomet statue to the Capitol from 1 to 3 p.m. today to rally for religious pluralism and stand as an objection to the state's endorsement of religion through placement of the 10 Commandments monument backed by Sen. Jason Rapert. Rapert is perturbed.
  • Satan vs. the supremacists

    So it goes. The Satanic Temple unveils its statue for a rally in support of the First Amendment protection against state establishment of religion. Meanwhile, a tiny group of white supremacists appeared in opposition, lending comfort to Bro. Jason Rapert's Biblical slab on the back side of the Capitol.

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation