Halter gets an OK | Arkansas Blog

Friday, August 15, 2008

Halter gets an OK

Posted By on Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:15 PM

The state Ethics Commission today issued an advisory opinion about state official involvement in ballot initiatives. They may spend, but must report, expenditures of more than $500 in public money on "direct advocacy" -- a yes or no vote -- on ballot measures.

But general office overhead doesn't count.

Thus, an employe of Lt. Gov. Bill Halter can join him in traveling the state to talk about the proposed lottery without violating any ethics law and also not be required to file financial disclosure unless there's an expenditure of more than $500 on direct advocacy.

Sounds right ot me.



Statement on Ethics Commission Opinion

LITTLE ROCK (Aug. 15, 2008) - The Lieutenant Governor's Office is pleased with an advisory opinion unanimously approved today by the Arkansas Ethics Commission about what conditions or circumstances trigger a report under the Disclosure Act for Public Initiatives, Referenda, and Measures Referred to Voters.

"The Ethics Commission's formal opinion confirms what we have believed all along concerning our actions related to the scholarship lottery amendment," said Michael Cook, Chief of Staff to Lieutenant Governor Bill Halter.  "We have been methodically cautious in abiding by all relevant rules, regulations and laws, and have consistently sought guidance from the Ethics Commission regarding our work for this $100-million-a-year public policy initiative.  We asked for this written opinion for even further clarification and we appreciate the commission's response.  We believe it will be helpful for other state employees who engage in public policy work for their respective offices.

 "We are not required to file reports with the Ethics Commission unless we expressly advocate passage as defined by this opinion."

The opinion states that the "trigger" for reporting is when a public servant expends public funds in excess of $500 for the purpose of "expressly advocating" for or against a ballot question.  The opinion further states that "express advocacy which is subject to Arkansas' campaign finance laws requires explicit words urging action (i.e. "vote for" "vote against") in order to be constitutionally regulated by the State."

"Communication which falls short of urging action is unregulated political speech and not subject to the Disclosure Act," the opinion states.

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas: Land of .......

    Welcome to Arkansas: Land of cowardly politicians, discriminatory laws, inhumane turkey drops and lots and lots of Trump voters.
    • Oct 8, 2016
  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation