WM3 slam of Jonesboro judge | Arkansas Blog

Friday, September 12, 2008

WM3 slam of Jonesboro judge

Posted By on Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:23 PM

Advocates for the West Memphis Three have distributed a statement slamming Circuit Judge David Burnett of Jonesboro for refusing to hold a hearing on new DNA evidence in the murder cases agains the three and denying a new trial for Damien Echols, who has been sentenced to die. He has two more petitions under consideration. I guess the WM3 supporters figure he's not going to get any better.


Following a ruling Wednesday that no new evidence would be heard in the case of the West Memphis Three, supporters of the three men maintain vehement opposition to what they call the "mockery" being made of the Arkansas legal system in this case.
"Judge [David] Burnett¢s order yesterday denying Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin a new trial was more than just another injustice in the long and tragic history of this case; it blatantly disregarded the statute that our Legislature enacted in 2001 to ensure that citizens are not executed or imprisoned when new scientific evidence demonstrates that they are innocent," said Lorri Davis, wife of Damien Echols.
According to Arkansas Take Action, a non-profit organization formed to seek justice for three men convicted of the triple homicide of three young boys in 1993, the 2001 statute requires a judge to weigh all evidence regarding guilt or innocence. The statute expressly orders that a judge will consider new items of evidence not presented at the original trial to determine whether a defendant would now be acquitted by a jury of peers. If Burnett had allowed it, the court would have heard a multitude of evidence, including the following:
1.  that none of the collected DNA matched any of the defendants, but DNA evidence points to another suspect, Terry Hobbs (stepfather of one of the victims);
2.  that witnesses placed Echols at his residence on the phone several miles away;
3.  that the wounds the prosecution claimed were inflicted in a satanic ritual by a survival knife found near Baldwin¢s house were shown by forensic pathologists to be the result of post-mortem animal predation;
4.  that the state¢s Satanic expert was a fraud, having obtained his Ph.D. through a now-defunct mail-order college, and later having written a book claiming that two girls were abducted by aliens but recalled nothing of the encounter until he, Dale Griffis, was able to extract the information through hypnosis; and,
5.  that a key prosecution witness, Anthony Hollingsworth, who testified to seeing Echols near the crime scene, had explicit motive to lie to prosecutors. Not only was he on probation for sexually assaulting his sister at the time of his testimony, but recent child rape charges against him were dismissed by one of the prosecutors in the case.
In addition to all this, ATA co-chair Capi Peck said, "the notion that Echols¢ and Baldwin¢s guilt was determined by facts presented from the witness stand at trial is preposterous in light of what has been revealed as jury misconduct."  A sworn affidavit from a Little Rock attorney, hired on an unrelated matter in 1994 by original Echols-Baldwin trial jury foreman Kent Arnold, outlines the misconduct in explicit detail.
According to the affidavit, still under seal, Arnold admitted that he had:
1.  misled the court about his opinions in order to secure his selection as a jury member;
2.  prejudged the defendants¢ guilt;
3.  used a statement from Jessie Misskelley from a separate trial in the case to sway the jury to return a guilty verdict. (This despite the fact that he told the Little Rock lawyer the prosecution had not proved its case and that the Misskelley statement was all they would have to go on). 
Misskelley's statement was inadmissible in the Echols-Baldwin trial, as Misskelley had recanted and refused to testify against the other two men.  The jury's consideration of it, from what had been gleaned from news sources, and the prosecution's "slip" in referring to it during arguments was a clear violation of the defendants' sixth amendment rights
"By refusing to hear the evidence not presented at the first trial, Judge Burnett has evaded, but cannot suppress, a simple truth," Davis said. "Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin would surely be acquitted of these charges if they were tried today."


From the ArkTimes store


Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Two more get prison for feeding program fraud

    Two more people got prison sentences today for defrauding the state-run program that uses federal money to provide meals to poor children.
    • Aug 18, 2017
  • Friday's open line

    Here's today's video. And it is the open line.
    • Aug 18, 2017
  • Steve Bannon leaving White House

    The odious Steve Bannon, right-wing nationalist, is departing his White House job as strategist for Donald Trump.  Alas, Trump is still there.
    • Aug 18, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Super Bowl line

    Over to you.
    • Feb 7, 2016
  • Charter school accountability: Non-existent in Arkansas

    A state audit finds charter school spending violated state law, but the state Education Department says it has no responsibility for ensuring proper management of charter schools. Say what?
    • Mar 5, 2016
  • Policy group urges opposition to new charter seats in Little Rock

    The Arkansas Public Policy Panel is urging supporters of the Little Rock School District to tell state Board of Education members they oppose applications to be heard this week to dramatically expand the number of charter school seats in the Little Rock School District.
    • Mar 9, 2016

Most Shared

  • Take yourself there: Mavis Staples coming to LR for Central High performance

    Gospel and R&B singer and civil rights activist Mavis Staples, who has been inspiring fans with gospel-inflected freedom songs like "I'll Take You There" and "March Up Freedom's Highway" and the poignant "Oh What a Feeling" will come to Little Rock for the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the desegregation of Central High.
  • Klan's president

    Everything that Donald Trump does — make that everything that he says — is calculated to thrill his lustiest disciples. But he is discovering that what was brilliant for a politician is a miscalculation for a president, because it deepens the chasm between him and most Americans.
  • On Charlottesville

    Watching the Charlottesville spectacle from halfway across the country, I confess that my first instinct was to raillery. Vanilla ISIS, somebody called this mob of would-be Nazis. A parade of love-deprived nerds marching bravely out of their parents' basements carrying tiki torches from Home Depot.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: What's your Big Idea for Arkansas?

    • Do you need an urgent loan to start up business, debt loan? buy a car…

    • on August 19, 2017
  • Re: Friday's open line

    • Cato, you could see where Glibbus was going immediately in prelude to his "dramatic" one-liner…

    • on August 18, 2017
  • Re: Friday's open line

    • Keith Olbermann highlights a column written by Art Buchwald in 1973 of what Republicans should…

    • on August 18, 2017



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation